Intrapartum signal quality with external fetal heart rate monitoring: a two way trial of external Doppler CTG ultrasound and the abdominal fetal electrocardiogram

被引:39
|
作者
Reinhard, Joscha [1 ]
Hayes-Gill, Barrie R. [2 ]
Schiermeier, Sven [3 ]
Hatzmann, Wolfgang [3 ]
Herrmann, Eva [4 ]
Heinrich, Tomas M. [1 ]
Louwen, Frank [1 ]
机构
[1] Goethe Univ Frankfurt, Fac Med, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, D-60590 Frankfurt, Germany
[2] Univ Nottingham, Sch Elect & Elect Engn, Nottingham NG7 2RD, England
[3] Ruhr Univ Bochum, Teaching Hosp, Marien Hosp Witten, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol,Fac Med, D-58452 Witten, Germany
[4] Goethe Univ Frankfurt, Dept Biostat & Math Models, D-60590 Frankfurt, Germany
关键词
Non-invasive fetal electrocardiogram (fECG); Doppler ultrasound cardiotocogram (CTG); Fetal heart rate (FHR); First and second stage of labour; Signal quality; CARDIOTOCOGRAPHY;
D O I
10.1007/s00404-012-2413-4
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
The objective of this study was to assess the fetal heart rate (FHR) signal quality of non-invasive abdominal fetal electrocardiogram (fECG) in comparison to the Doppler ultrasound cardiotocogram (CTG) during the first and second stage of labour. This was a prospective observational study of non-invasive fECG using five abdominally sited electrodes against the traditional Doppler ultrasound CTG probe on 144 patients. Data were analysed for signal quality before and after outlier removal. Abdominal fECG signal quality was significantly better during the first stage of labour in comparison to Doppler CTG (median fECG reliability of 95.7 % vs. median 87.3 % for Doppler, p < 0.001), whereas during second stage of labour, equivalence was demonstrated (p > 0.05). For the first and second stage of labour, fECG showed 106/135 (78.5 %) and 46/98 (46.9 %) women having fetal signal loss below 20 %, respectively. Similarly, Doppler ultrasound demonstrated 104/135 (77.0 %) and 51/98 (52.0 %) women having fetal signal loss below 20 % during first and second stage of labour, respectively. The non-invasive abdominal fECG presents an improved FHR signal quality during the first stage of labour and an equivalent signal quality during the second stage.
引用
收藏
页码:1103 / 1107
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Intrapartum signal quality with external fetal heart rate monitoring: a two way trial of external Doppler CTG ultrasound and the abdominal fetal electrocardiogram
    Joscha Reinhard
    Barrie R. Hayes-Gill
    Sven Schiermeier
    Wolfgang Hatzmann
    Eva Herrmann
    Tomas M. Heinrich
    Frank Louwen
    Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 2012, 286 : 1103 - 1107
  • [2] The quality of intrapartum fetal heart rate monitoring
    Bakker, PCAM
    Colenbrander, GJ
    Verstraeten, AA
    Van Geijn, HP
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2004, 116 (01) : 22 - 27
  • [3] FETAL HEART-RATE MONITORING USING THE ABDOMINAL FETAL ELECTROCARDIOGRAM
    CARTER, MC
    GUNN, P
    BEARD, RW
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 1980, 87 (05): : 396 - 401
  • [4] Intrapartum Heart Rate Ambiguity: A Comparison of Cardiotocogram and Abdominal Fetal Electrocardiogram with Maternal Electrocardiogram
    Reinhard, Joscha
    Hayes-Gill, Barrie R.
    Schiermeier, Sven
    Hatzmann, Hendrike
    Heinrich, Tomas M.
    Louwen, Frank
    GYNECOLOGIC AND OBSTETRIC INVESTIGATION, 2013, 75 (02) : 101 - 108
  • [5] ABDOMINAL ELECTROCARDIOGRAPHY IN INTRAPARTUM FETAL HEART-RATE MONITORING
    KARINIEMI, V
    ROSTI, J
    JOURNAL OF PERINATAL MEDICINE, 1986, 14 (04) : 263 - 266
  • [6] Towards fetal heart rate monitoring at home using the abdominal fetal electrocardiogram
    Crowe, JA
    Hayes-Gill, BR
    James, DK
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 18TH ANNUAL INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF THE IEEE ENGINEERING IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY SOCIETY, VOL 18, PTS 1-5, 1997, 18 : 47 - 48
  • [7] Relative accuracy of computerized intrapartum fetal heart rate pattern recognition by ultrasound and abdominal electrocardiogram detection
    Hayes-Gill, Barrie R.
    Martin, Terence R. P.
    Liu, Chong
    Cohen, Wayne R.
    ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2020, 99 (03) : 413 - 422
  • [8] Standard External Doppler Fetal Heart Tracings versus External Fetal Electrocardiogram in Very Preterm Gestation: A Pilot Study
    Fruhman, Gary
    Gavard, Jeffrey A.
    McCormick, Kristina
    Wilson-Griffin, Judy
    Amon, Erol
    Gross, Gilad A.
    AJP REPORTS, 2016, 6 (04): : E378 - E383
  • [9] Signal ambiguity resulting in unexpected outcome with external fetal heart rate monitoring
    Neilson, Duncan R.
    Freeman, Roger K.
    Mangan, Shelora
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2008, 198 (06) : 717 - 724
  • [10] Evaluation of an external fetal electrocardiogram monitoring system: a randomized controlled trial
    Monson, Martha
    Heuser, Cara
    Einerson, Brett D.
    Esplin, Isaac
    Snow, Greg
    Varner, Michael
    Esplin, M. Sean
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2020, 223 (02)