Statistical Analysis of Individual Participant Data Meta-Analyses: A Comparison of Methods and Recommendations for Practice

被引:166
|
作者
Stewart, Gavin B. [1 ]
Altman, Douglas G. [2 ]
Askie, Lisa M. [3 ]
Duley, Lelia [4 ]
Simmonds, Mark C. [1 ]
Stewart, Lesley A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ York, Ctr Reviews & Disseminat, York YO10 5DD, N Yorkshire, England
[2] Univ Oxford, Ctr Stat Med, Oxford, England
[3] Univ Sydney, NHMRC Clin Trials Ctr, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
[4] Univ Nottingham, Nottingham Clin Trials Unit, Nottingham NG7 2RD, England
来源
PLOS ONE | 2012年 / 7卷 / 10期
关键词
PATIENT DATA METAANALYSIS; RANDOMIZED-TRIALS; META-REGRESSION; LEVEL; MODEL; HETEROGENEITY; TIME;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0046042
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Background: Individual participant data (IPD) meta-analyses that obtain "raw'' data from studies rather than summary data typically adopt a "two-stage'' approach to analysis whereby IPD within trials generate summary measures, which are combined using standard meta-analytical methods. Recently, a range of "one-stage'' approaches which combine all individual participant data in a single meta-analysis have been suggested as providing a more powerful and flexible approach. However, they are more complex to implement and require statistical support. This study uses a dataset to compare "two-stage'' and "one-stage'' models of varying complexity, to ascertain whether results obtained from the approaches differ in a clinically meaningful way. Methods and Findings: We included data from 24 randomised controlled trials, evaluating antiplatelet agents, for the prevention of pre-eclampsia in pregnancy. We performed two-stage and one-stage IPD meta-analyses to estimate overall treatment effect and to explore potential treatment interactions whereby particular types of women and their babies might benefit differentially from receiving antiplatelets. Two-stage and one-stage approaches gave similar results, showing a benefit of using anti-platelets (Relative risk 0.90, 95% CI 0.84 to 0.97). Neither approach suggested that any particular type of women benefited more or less from antiplatelets. There were no material differences in results between different types of one-stage model. Conclusions: For these data, two-stage and one-stage approaches to analysis produce similar results. Although one-stage models offer a flexible environment for exploring model structure and are useful where across study patterns relating to types of participant, intervention and outcome mask similar relationships within trials, the additional insights provided by their usage may not outweigh the costs of statistical support for routine application in syntheses of randomised controlled trials. Researchers considering undertaking an IPD meta-analysis should not necessarily be deterred by a perceived need for sophisticated statistical methods when combining information from large randomised trials.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Development and validation of a prediction model for birthweight using individual participant data (IPD) meta-analyses
    Allotey, John
    Archer, Lucider
    Coomar, Dyuti
    Riley, Richard
    Thangaratinam, Shakila
    BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2023, 130 : 17 - 17
  • [32] Individual patient data meta-analyses in cancer
    Clarke, M
    Stewart, L
    Pignon, JP
    Bijnens, L
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 1998, 77 (11) : 2036 - 2044
  • [33] Alcohol intake and gastric cancer: Meta-analyses of published data versus individual participant data pooled analyses (StoP Project)
    Ferro, Ana
    Morais, Samantha
    Rota, Matteo
    Pelucchi, Claudio
    Bertuccio, Paola
    Bonzi, Rossella
    Galeone, Carlotta
    Zhang, Zuo-Feng
    Matsuo, Keitaro
    Ito, Hidemi
    Hu, Jinfu
    Johnson, Kenneth C.
    Yu, Guo-Pei
    Palli, Domenico
    Ferraroni, Monica
    Muscat, Joshua
    Malekzadeh, Reza
    Ye, Weimin
    Song, Huan
    Zaridze, David
    Maximovitch, Dmitry
    Fernandez de Larrea, Nerea
    Kogevinas, Manolis
    Vioque, Jesus
    Navarrete-Munoz, Eva M.
    Pakseresht, Mohammadreza
    Pourfarzi, Farhad
    Wolk, Alicja
    Orsini, Nicola
    Bellavia, Andrea
    Hakansson, Niclas
    Mu, Lina
    Pastorino, Roberta
    Kurtz, Robert C.
    Derakhshan, Mohammad H.
    Lagiou, Areti
    Lagiou, Pagona
    Boffetta, Paolo
    Boccia, Stefania
    Negri, Eva
    La Vecchia, Carlo
    Peleteiro, Barbara
    Lunet, Nuno
    CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2018, 54 : 125 - 132
  • [34] Tobacco smoking and gastric cancer: meta-analyses of published data versus pooled analyses of individual participant data (StoP Project)
    Ferro, Ana
    Morais, Samantha
    Rota, Matteo
    Pelucchi, Claudio
    Bertuccio, Paola
    Bonzi, Rossella
    Galeone, Carlotta
    Zhang, Zuo-Feng
    Matsuo, Keitaro
    Ito, Hidemi
    Hu, Jinfu
    Johnson, Kenneth C.
    Yu, Guo-Pei
    Palli, Domenico
    Ferraroni, Monica
    Muscat, Joshua
    Malekzadeh, Reza
    Ye, Weimin
    Song, Huan
    Zaridze, David
    Maximovitch, Dmitry
    Aragones, Nuria
    Castano-Vinyals, Gemma
    Vioque, Jesus
    Navarrete-Munoz, Eva M.
    Pakseresht, Mohammadreza
    Pourfarzi, Farhad
    Wolk, Alicja
    Orsini, Nicola
    Bellavia, Andrea
    Hakansson, Niclas
    Mu, Lina
    Pastorino, Roberta
    Kurtz, Robert C.
    Derakhshan, Mohammad H.
    Lagiou, Areti
    Lagiou, Pagona
    Boffetta, Paolo
    Boccia, Stefania
    Negri, Eva
    La Vecchia, Carlo
    Peleteiro, Barbara
    Lunet, Nuno
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER PREVENTION, 2018, 27 (03) : 197 - 204
  • [35] The identification and treatment of women with hyperglycaemia in pregnancy: an analysis of individual participant data, systematic reviews, meta-analyses and an economic evaluation
    Farrar, Diane
    Simmonds, Mark
    Griffin, Susan
    Duarte, Ana
    Lawlor, Debbie A.
    Sculpher, Mark
    Fairley, Lesley
    Golder, Su
    Tuffnell, Derek
    Bland, Martin
    Dunne, Fidelma
    Whitelaw, Donald
    Wright, John
    Sheldon, Trevor A.
    HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT, 2016, 20 (86) : 1 - +
  • [36] No consistent evidence of data availability bias existed in recent individual participant data meta-analyses: a meta-epidemiological study
    Tsujimoto, Yasushi
    Fujii, Tomoko
    Onishi, Akira
    Omae, Kenji
    Luo, Yan
    Imai, Hissei
    Takahashi, Sei
    Itaya, Takahiro
    Pinson, Claire
    Nevitt, Sarah J.
    Furukawa, Toshi A.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2020, 118 : 107 - +
  • [37] Prespecification of subgroup analyses and examination of treatment-subgroup interactions in cancer individual participant data meta-analyses are suboptimal
    Gao, Ya
    Liu, Ming
    Shi, Shuzhen
    Niu, Mingming
    Li, Jiang
    Zhang, Junhua
    Song, Fujian
    Tian, Jinhui
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2021, 138 : 156 - 167
  • [38] The Contribution of "Individual Participant Data" Meta-Analyses of Psychotherapies for Depression to the Development of Personalized Treatments: A Systematic Review
    Cuijpers, Pim
    Ciharova, Marketa
    Quero, Soledad
    Miguel, Clara
    Driessen, Ellen
    Harrer, Mathias
    Purgato, Marianna
    Ebert, David
    Karyotaki, Eirini
    JOURNAL OF PERSONALIZED MEDICINE, 2022, 12 (01):
  • [39] Psychosocial factors and cancer incidence (PSY-CA): Protocol for individual participant data meta-analyses
    van Tuijl, Lonneke A.
    Voogd, Adri C.
    de Graeff, Alexander
    Hoogendoorn, Adriaan W.
    Ranchor, Adelita V.
    Pan, Kuan-Yu
    Basten, Maartje
    Lamers, Femke
    Geerlings, Mirjam I.
    Abell, Jessica G.
    Awadalla, Philip
    Bakker, Marije F.
    Beekman, Aartjan T. F.
    Bjerkeset, Ottar
    Boyd, Andy
    Cui, Yunsong
    Galenkamp, Henrike
    Garssen, Bert
    Hellingman, Sean
    Huisman, Martijn
    Huss, Anke
    Keats, Melanie R.
    Kok, Almar A. L.
    Luik, Annemarie I.
    Noisel, Nolwenn
    Onland-Moret, N. Charlotte
    Payette, Yves
    Penninx, Brenda W. J. H.
    Portengen, Lutzen
    Rissanen, Ina
    Roest, Annelieke M.
    Rosmalen, Judith G. M.
    Ruiter, Rikje
    Schoevers, Robert A.
    Soave, David M.
    Spaan, Mandy
    Steptoe, Andrew
    Stronks, Karien
    Sund, Erik R.
    Sweeney, Ellen
    Teyhan, Alison
    Vaartjes, Ilonca
    van der Willik, Kimberly D.
    van Leeuwen, Flora E.
    van Petersen, Rutger
    Verschuren, W. M. Monique
    Visseren, Frank
    Vermeulen, Roel
    Dekker, Joost
    BRAIN AND BEHAVIOR, 2021, 11 (10):
  • [40] Meta-analyses of safety data: a comparison of exact versus asymptotic methods
    Vandermeer, Ben
    Bialy, Liza
    Hooton, Nicola
    Hartling, Lisa
    Klassen, Terry P.
    Johnston, Bradley C.
    Wiebe, Natasha
    STATISTICAL METHODS IN MEDICAL RESEARCH, 2009, 18 (04) : 421 - 432