Analysis of Polkadot: Architecture, Internals, and Contradictions

被引:20
|
作者
Abbas, Hanaa [1 ]
Caprolu, Maurantonio [1 ]
Di Pietro, Roberto [1 ]
机构
[1] Hamad Bin Khalifa Univ, Qatar Fdn, Coll Sci & Engn, Div Informat & Comp Technol, Doha, Qatar
来源
2022 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON BLOCKCHAIN (BLOCKCHAIN 2022) | 2022年
关键词
blockchain; multi-chain; cryptocurrency; Proof of Stake; Polkadot; decentralization; scalability; DeFi; governance;
D O I
10.1109/Blockchain55522.2022.00019
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Polkadot is a network protocol launched in 2020 with the ambition of unlocking the full potential of blockchain technologies. Its novel multi-chain protocol allows arbitrary data to be transferred across heterogeneous blockchains, enabling the implementation of a wide range of novel use cases. The Polkadot architecture is based on the principles of sharding, which promises to solve scalability and interoperability shortcomings that encumber many existing blockchain-based systems. Lured by these impressive features, investors immediately appreciated the Polkadot project, which is firmly ranked among the top 10 cryptocurrencies by capitalization (around 10 Billions USD). However, Polkadot has not received the same level of attention from academia that other proposals in the crypto domain have received so far, like Bitcoin, Ethereum, and Algorand, to cite a few. Polkadot architecture is described and discussed only in the grey literature, and very little is known about its internals. In this paper, we provide the first systematic study on the Polkadot environment, detailing its protocols, governance, and economic model. Then, we identify several limitations-supported by an empirical analysis of its ledger-that could severely affect the scalability and overall security of the network. Finally, based on our analysis, we provide future directions to inspire researchers to investigate further the Polkadot ecosystem and its pitfalls in terms of performance, security, and network aspects.
引用
收藏
页码:61 / 70
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] MODAL CHARACTERISTIC ANALYSIS OF THE APR1400 NUCLEAR REACTOR INTERNALS FOR SEISMIC ANALYSIS
    Park, Jong-Beom
    Choi, Youngin
    Lee, Sang-Jeong
    Park, No-Cheol
    Park, Kyoung-Su
    Park, Young-Pil
    Park, Chan-Il
    NUCLEAR ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY, 2014, 46 (05) : 689 - 698
  • [32] Compressibility and Added Masses in the Blowdown Analysis of Nuclear Reactor Internals.
    Krieg, Rolf
    Schumann, Ulrich
    Atomkernenergie, Kerntechnik, 1981, 39 (01): : 57 - 63
  • [33] COMPRESSIBILITY AND ADDED MASSES IN THE BLOWDOWN ANALYSIS OF NUCLEAR-REACTOR INTERNALS
    KRIEG, R
    SCHUMANN, U
    ATOMKERNENERGIE-KERNTECHNIK, 1981, 39 (01): : 57 - 63
  • [34] Application of seismic analysis methodology to small modular integral reactor internals
    Choi, Youngin
    Park, Jongbum
    Park, No-Cheol
    Park, Young-Pil
    Park, Kyoung-Su
    Jeong, Kyeong-Hoon
    JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2015, 52 (02) : 228 - 240
  • [35] MODEL EXPERIMENTATION AND ANALYSIS OF FLOW-INDUCED VIBRATIONS OF PWR INTERNALS
    DUBOURG, M
    ASSEDO, R
    CAUQUELI.C
    NUCLEAR ENGINEERING AND DESIGN, 1974, 27 (03) : 315 - 333
  • [36] Numerical Simulation of Effect of Internals on Slugging Fluidization and Analysis of Nonuniformity Index
    Wang, Xiaoling
    Yu, Liang
    Wang, Jun
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL REACTOR ENGINEERING, 2012, 10
  • [37] Numerical simulation of effect of internals on slugging fluidization and analysis of nonuniformity index
    Wang, Xiaoling
    Yu, Liang
    Wang, Jun
    International Journal of Chemical Reactor Engineering, 2012, 10 (01)
  • [38] Attitudes towards genetic testing: Analysis of contradictions
    Jallinoja, P
    Hakonen, A
    Aro, AR
    Niemela, P
    Hietala, M
    Lonnqvist, J
    Peltonen, L
    Aula, P
    SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 1998, 46 (10) : 1367 - 1374
  • [39] HUMANISTIC PSYCHOLOGY AS IDEOLOGY - AN ANALYSIS OF MASLOW CONTRADICTIONS
    SHAW, R
    COLIMORE, K
    JOURNAL OF HUMANISTIC PSYCHOLOGY, 1988, 28 (03) : 51 - 74
  • [40] COUNTERFACTUAL CONTRADICTIONS: INTERPRETIVE ERROR IN THE ANALYSIS OF AEDPA
    Burns, Amy Knight
    STANFORD LAW REVIEW, 2013, 65 (01) : 203 - 239