Accounting for loop flexibility during protein-protein docking

被引:73
|
作者
Bastard, K
Prévost, C
Zacharias, M
机构
[1] Inst Biol Physicochim, Lab Biochim Theor, UPR 9080, F-75005 Paris, France
[2] Int Univ Bremen, Sch Sci & Engn, Bremen, Germany
关键词
flexible protein-protein docking; docking minimization; loop flexibility; reduced protein models; mean-field theory;
D O I
10.1002/prot.20770
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Although reliable docking can now be achieved for systems that do not undergo important induced conformational change upon association, the presence of flexible surface loops, which must adapt to the steric and electrostatic properties of a partner, generally presents a major obstacle. We report here the first docking method that allows large loop movements during a systematic exploration of the possible arrangements of the two partners in terms of position and rotation. Our strategy consists in taking into account an ensemble of possible loop conformations by a multi-copy representation within a reduced protein model. The docking process starts from regularly distributed positions and orientations of the ligand around the whole receptor. Each starting configuration is submitted to energy minimization during which the best-fitting loop conformation is selected based on the mean-field theory. Trials were carried out on proteins with significant differences in the main-chain conformation of the binding loop between isolated form and complexed form, which were docked to their partner considered in their bound form. The method is able to predict complexes very close to the crystal complex both in terms of relative position of the two partners and of the geometry of the flexible loop. We also show that introducing loop flexibility on the isolated protein form during systematic docking largely improves the predictions of relative position of the partners in comparison with rigid-body docking.
引用
收藏
页码:956 / 969
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Protein-protein docking with rosettadock.
    Gray, JJ
    Baker, D
    ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2004, 227 : U220 - U221
  • [22] Pushing the Backbone in Protein-Protein Docking
    Kuroda, Daisuke
    Gray, Jeffrey J.
    STRUCTURE, 2016, 24 (10) : 1821 - 1829
  • [23] Progress in protein-protein docking approaches
    Li Chun-Hua
    Ma Xiao-Hui
    Chen Wei-Zu
    Wang Cun-Xin
    PROGRESS IN BIOCHEMISTRY AND BIOPHYSICS, 2006, 33 (07) : 616 - 621
  • [24] Protein-protein docking predictions with RosettaDock
    Gray, JJ
    Baker, D
    BIOPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 2004, 86 (01) : 306A - 306A
  • [25] Protein-Protein Interaction Analysis by Docking
    Fink, Florian
    Ederer, Stephan
    Gronwald, Wolfram
    ALGORITHMS, 2009, 2 (01): : 429 - 436
  • [26] Hydrophobic complementarity in protein-protein docking
    Berchanski, A
    Shapira, B
    Eisenstein, M
    PROTEINS-STRUCTURE FUNCTION AND BIOINFORMATICS, 2004, 56 (01) : 130 - 142
  • [27] Interolog interfaces in protein-protein docking
    Alsop, James D.
    Mitchell, Julie C.
    PROTEINS-STRUCTURE FUNCTION AND BIOINFORMATICS, 2015, 83 (11) : 1940 - 1946
  • [28] Computer Vision for Protein-protein Docking
    Rudden, Lucas S. P.
    Degiacomi, Matteo T.
    Willcocks, Chris G.
    BIOPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 2020, 118 (03) : 305A - 306A
  • [29] Protein-Protein Docking Dealing With the Unknown
    Moreira, Irina S.
    Fernandes, Pedro A.
    Ramos, Maria J.
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL CHEMISTRY, 2010, 31 (02) : 317 - 342
  • [30] Principles of flexible protein-protein docking
    Andrusier, Nelly
    Mashiach, Efrat
    Nussinov, Ruth
    Wolfson, Haim J.
    PROTEINS-STRUCTURE FUNCTION AND BIOINFORMATICS, 2008, 73 (02) : 271 - 289