Dosimetric impact of intrafraction changes in MR-guided high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy for prostate cancer

被引:8
|
作者
Rink, Alexandra [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Borg, Jette [1 ,2 ]
Simeonov, Anna [1 ]
O'Leary, Gerald [4 ,5 ]
Helou, Joelle [1 ,2 ]
Menard, Cynthia [3 ,6 ]
Chung, Peter [1 ,2 ]
Jaffray, David A. [1 ,2 ,3 ,5 ,7 ]
Berlin, Alejandro [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hlth Network, Princess Margaret Canc Ctr, Radiat Med Program, Toronto, ON, Canada
[2] Univ Toronto, Dept Radiat Oncol, Toronto, ON, Canada
[3] TECHNA Inst, Toronto, ON, Canada
[4] Univ Toronto, Dept Anesthesia, Toronto, ON, Canada
[5] Univ Hlth Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
[6] Univ Montreal Hosp Res Ctr CRCHUM, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[7] Univ Toronto, Dept Med Biophys, Toronto, ON, Canada
关键词
MR-guided HDR; Prostate; Intrafraction dosimetry; Treatment verification; Edema; CATHETER MOVEMENT; MONOTHERAPY; FRACTION; VOLUME;
D O I
10.1016/j.brachy.2017.06.001
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
PURPOSE: To assess changes in implant and treatment volumes through the course of a prostate high-dose-rate brachytherapy procedure and their impact on plan quality metrics. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Sixteen MRI-guided high-dose-rate procedures included a post-treatment MR (ptMR) immediately after treatment delivery (135 min between MR scans). Target and organs at risk (OARs) were contoured, and catheters were reconstructed. The delivered treatment plan was applied to the ptMR image set. Volumes and dosimetrie parameters in the ptMR were evaluated and compared with the delivered plan using a paired two-tailed t-test with p < 0.05 considered statistically significant. RESULTS: An average increase of 8.9% in prostate volume was observed for whole-gland treatments, resulting in reduction in coverage for both prostate and planning target volume, reflected in decreased V-100 (mean 3.3% and 4.6%, respectively, p < 0.05), and D-90 (mean 7.1% and 7.6%, respectively, of prescription dose, p < 0.05). There was no significant change in doses to OARs. For partial-gland treatments, there was an increase in planning target volume (9.1%), resulting in reduced coverage and D90 (mean 3.6% and 12.4%, respectively, p < 0.05). A decrease in D-0.5cc, for bladder (3%, p < 0.05) was observed, with no significant changes in dose to other OARs. CONCLUSIONS: Volumetric changes were observed during the time between planning MR and ptMR. Nonetheless, treatment plans for both whole- and partial-gland therapies remained clinically acceptable. These results apply to clinical settings in which patients remain in the same position and under anesthesia during the entire treatment process. (C) 2017 American Brachytherapy Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:59 / 67
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Salvage high-dose-rate brachytherapy for recurrent prostate cancer
    Kaprin, A. D.
    Ivanov, S. A.
    Karyakin, O. B.
    Obuhov, A. A.
    Biryukov, V. A.
    Borysheva, N. B.
    Sanin, D. B.
    Lepilina, O. G.
    Smolkin, A. L.
    Dem'yanovich, A., V
    Minaeva, N. G.
    Mikhaylovskiy, N., V
    [J]. ONKOUROLOGIYA, 2020, 16 (04): : 112 - 119
  • [32] The emerging role of high-dose-rate brachytherapy for prostate cancer
    Morton, GC
    [J]. CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2005, 17 (04) : 219 - 227
  • [33] Salvage high-dose-rate brachytherapy for prostate cancer recurrence
    Wojcieszek, P.
    [J]. RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2018, 127 : S355 - S356
  • [34] A sector-based dosimetric analysis of dose heterogeneity in high-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy
    Mesko, Shane
    Park, Sang-June
    Kishan, Amar U.
    Demanes, D. Jeffrey
    Kamrava, Mitchell
    [J]. BRACHYTHERAPY, 2015, 14 (02) : 173 - 178
  • [35] A dosimetric comparison of high dose rate (HDR) and low dose-rate (LDR) prostate brachytherapy.
    Al-Hebshi, A
    Morton, G
    Sankreacha, R
    [J]. RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2004, 72 : S36 - S36
  • [36] Changes in Tumor Anatomy and Dosimetry during MR-Guided Pulsed Dose Rate Brachytherapy for Cervix Cancer
    Li, A. W.
    Jezioranski, J.
    Xie, J.
    McNiven, A.
    Di Tomasso, A.
    Quintos, J.
    Levin, W.
    Manchul, L.
    Fyles, A.
    Milosevic, M.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2010, 78 (03): : S397 - S397
  • [37] DOSIMETRIC COMPARISON BETWEEN PERMANENT VS. HIGH-DOSE-RATE PROSTATE BRACHYTHERAPY
    Frohlich, G.
    Major, T.
    Agoston, P.
    Lovey, J.
    Polgar, C.
    [J]. RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2009, 92 : S137 - S137
  • [38] Dosimetric impact of intrafraction upper abdominal tumor motion during MR-guided SBRT
    Grimbergen, G.
    Eijkelenkamp, H.
    Heerkens, H.
    Raaymakers, B.
    Intven, M.
    Meijer, G.
    [J]. RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2022, 170 : S413 - S414
  • [39] High dose rate (HDR) brachytherapy for prostate cancer in the early stages
    Bobkov, M.
    [J]. ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2016, 27
  • [40] Results of high dose rate (HDR) brachytherapy boost for prostate cancer
    Kelly, D
    Flynn, J
    Brookover, W
    [J]. RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2004, 71 : S18 - S18