ON THE EFFICACY OF INFORMATION TRANSFER IN COMPLEX NETWORKS

被引:0
|
作者
Shettigar, Nandan [1 ]
Yang, Chun-Lin [1 ]
Suh, C. Steve [1 ]
机构
[1] Texas A&M Univ, Nonlinear Engn & Control Lab, Dept Mech Engn, Coll Stn, TX 77843 USA
关键词
Complex Networks; Information Transfer; Entropy; Coupling; Synchronization; Asynchronization; Chaos; SYNAPTIC PLASTICITY;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
The adaptability of a complex network determines its ability to maintain stability in a time-dependent environment. These change in macrostate dynamics (time-varying properties in the form of adaptations) are facilitated through a respective change in the microstate configurations of a network. Consequently, these configurations are in terms of the cumulative interactions of the constituents which compose the network ensemble. The nonlinear culmination of these interactions (connections) result in emergent patterns. Therefore, defining the local degree of coupling (strength of connected interactions between constituents) and how these change over time is essential to determine the resultant global time-varying properties of a complex network. Thus, this study proposes the parameters of connectivity (degree of coupling) between constituents in terms of efficacy of information transmission and reception. The underlying logic is that the degree of coupling between two nodes (constituents) can be defined in terms of how much information is transmitted by a donor and how well this is received by the recipient. These parameters control the microstate configurations of a complex network from which macrostate dynamics emerges that govern the adaptability of the network. As global network dynamical properties are nonstationary, the individual (local) constituents and their couplings must also exhibit dynamic, nonstationary behaviors to maintain stability. These local factors result in highly nonlinear behaviors which produce an amalgamation of overall (global) synchronous and asynchronous emergent patterns based on a desired objective and physical system constraints. Furthermore, the intrinsically time-variant nature of the individual constituents and their connections have a particular degree of variance in the time and frequency domains. This characteristic of the degree of coupling controls and allows for change in the magnitude of information transfer between nodes (constituents) in the network. Thus, the adaptability of the degree of coupling and is the foundational basis that allows the global collective properties of a network system to have a high degree of adaptability and robustness to time-varying environments (external disruptions that can compromise system stability). Additionally, emergent behaviors result from the constructive (or destructive) interactions of local dynamics which can increase (or decrease) the influence of individual behaviors amidst the scales of a complex network. This produces a mix of global asynchronous and synchronous organization across spatial and temporal scales that correspond to stable ensemble behaviors. These spatiotemporal scales may exhibit statistical self-similarity. The specific type of emergent scales of behavior is regulated by the degree of coupling between constituents. Therefore, effectively regulating the degree of coupling between constituents is a fundamental basis in regulating a complex network's capability to adapt to disturbances coming from within as well as without. General parameters defining the degree of coupling are the efficacy of information transmission and the efficacy of information reception. In this study, synaptic plasticity (the modulation of the degree of coupling between neurons) in the human brain is used as an example to enumerate how the parameters controlling the degree of coupling between nodes (the efficacy of information transmission and reception) can be defined, modeled and universally implemented to further a comprehensive understanding of the nonlinear and potential chaotic nature of complex networks in general.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Information processing in complex networks: Graph entropy and information functionals
    Dehmer, Matthias
    APPLIED MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTATION, 2008, 201 (1-2) : 82 - 94
  • [32] Information Fragmentation, Encryption and Information Flow in Complex Biological Networks
    Bohm, Clifford
    Kirkpatrick, Douglas
    Cao, Victoria
    Adami, Christoph
    ENTROPY, 2022, 24 (05)
  • [33] Optimal complex networks spontaneously emerge when information transfer is maximized at least expense: A design perspective
    Katare, S
    West, DH
    COMPLEXITY, 2006, 11 (04) : 26 - 35
  • [34] Probing and shaping the information transfer of noise-perturbed complex networks via Markov Chain analysis
    Ramli, Muhamad Azfar
    Monterola, Christopher Pineda
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL SCIENCE, 2014, 5 (06) : 851 - 860
  • [35] Deep neural networks classifying transfer efficiency in complex networks
    Melnikov, Alexey A.
    Fedichkin, Leonid E.
    Lee, Ray-Kuang
    Alodjants, Alexander
    2020 OPTO-ELECTRONICS AND COMMUNICATIONS CONFERENCE (OECC 2020), 2020,
  • [36] INFORMATION NETWORKS - DEFINITIONS AND MESSAGE TRANSFER MODELS
    NANCE, RE
    BHAT, UN
    KORFHAGE, RR
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE, 1972, 23 (04): : 237 - &
  • [37] Time optimal information transfer in spintronics networks
    Langbein, Frank C.
    Schirmer, Sophie
    Jonckheere, Edmond
    2015 54TH IEEE CONFERENCE ON DECISION AND CONTROL (CDC), 2015, : 6454 - 6459
  • [38] Knowledge Transfer among Heterogeneous Information Networks
    Xiang, Evan Wei
    Liu, Nathan N.
    Pan, Sinno Jialin
    Yang, Qiang
    2009 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON DATA MINING WORKSHOPS (ICDMW 2009), 2009, : 429 - 434
  • [39] Noise enhances information transfer in hierarchical networks
    Agnieszka Czaplicka
    Janusz A. Holyst
    Peter M. A. Sloot
    Scientific Reports, 3
  • [40] Modeling and Study of Information Transfer in Complex Network
    Deng, Chunhui
    Deng, Huifang
    Fu, Zhipeng
    2018 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SENSING, DIAGNOSTICS, PROGNOSTICS, AND CONTROL (SDPC), 2018, : 668 - 675