Composite Task Selection with Heterogeneous Crowdsourcing

被引:0
|
作者
Zhang, Jianhui [1 ]
Li, Zhi [1 ]
Lin, Xiaojun [2 ]
Jiang, Feilong [1 ]
机构
[1] Hangzhou Dianzi Univ, Coll Comp Sci & Technol, Hangzhou 310018, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
[2] Purdue Univ, Sch Elect & Comp Engn, W Lafayette, IN 47907 USA
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Composite Task; Crowdsourcing; Mobile Crowdsensing; Game Theory;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TP3 [计算技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
A common feature among many crowdsourcing applications is to decompose the huge or complex tasks into some small sub-ones, which require some users with different skills to implement. The kind of tasks are composite and called Composite Tasks (CTs), which are said to be completed and return reward only after all of their sub-tasks are finished successfully. Meanwhile, users may have various capabilities to implement diverse sub-tasks (STs) with corresponding cost so users are heterogeneous. In this paper, we study the problem of how users choose the STs to maximize their payoff (reward minus cost) when there are multiple such CTs. This payoff maximization problem with multiple CTs and heterogenous users turns out to be NP-completed. We then propose a Local Composite Task Selection (LCTS) algorithm to help the users choose their subtask strategies. Its convergence and complexity are analyzed theoretically. For comparison, we design a centralized Composite Task Selection (CTS) algorithm and a Low Cost and Random sub-task selection (LCR) algorithm as benchmarks. Numerical results suggest that the LCTS algorithm achieves a similar payoff and task completion ratio to the CTS when the number of users is large. The performance of LCTS is highly over LCR on both of the payoff and the task completion ratio. The results also illustrate the quick convergence of the LCTS algorithm.
引用
下载
收藏
页码:379 / 387
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The Dimensions of Crowdsourcing Task Design
    Catallo, Ilio
    Martinenghi, Davide
    WEB ENGINEERING (ICWE 2017), 2017, 10360 : 394 - 402
  • [22] Secure Task Recommendation in Crowdsourcing
    Shu, Jiangang
    Jia, Xiaohua
    2016 IEEE GLOBAL COMMUNICATIONS CONFERENCE (GLOBECOM), 2016,
  • [23] Efficient Task Decomposition in Crowdsourcing
    Jiang, Huan
    Matsubara, Shigeo
    PRIMA 2014: PRINCIPLES AND PRACTICE OF MULTI-AGENT SYSTEMS, 2014, 8861 : 65 - 73
  • [24] The Impact of Task Abandonment in Crowdsourcing
    Han, Lei
    Roitero, Kevin
    Gadiraju, Ujwal
    Sarasua, Cristina
    Checco, Alessandro
    Maddalena, Eddy
    Demartini, Gianluca
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON KNOWLEDGE AND DATA ENGINEERING, 2021, 33 (05) : 2266 - 2279
  • [25] Cross-Task Crowdsourcing
    Mo, Kaixiang
    Zhong, Erheng
    Yang, Qiang
    19TH ACM SIGKDD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON KNOWLEDGE DISCOVERY AND DATA MINING (KDD'13), 2013, : 677 - 685
  • [26] DOCUMENT AND TASK SELECTION FROM COMPOSITE MENU.
    Anon
    IBM technical disclosure bulletin, 1985, 27 (10 B): : 6239 - 6240
  • [27] Perceived Task Similarities for Task Recommendation in Crowdsourcing Systems
    Schnitzer, Steffen
    Neitzel, Svenja
    Schmidt, Sebastian
    Rensing, Christoph
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 25TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON WORLD WIDE WEB (WWW'16 COMPANION), 2016, : 585 - 590
  • [28] Auxiliary-task Based Deep Reinforcement Learning for Participant Selection Problem in Mobile Crowdsourcing
    Shen, Wei
    He, Xiaonan
    Zhang, Chuheng
    Ni, Qiang
    Dou, Wanchun
    Wang, Yan
    CIKM '20: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 29TH ACM INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INFORMATION & KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT, 2020, : 1355 - 1364
  • [29] Understanding Vendor Selection in Crowdsourcing Marketplace: A Matter of Vendor-Task Fit and Swift Trust
    Guo, Wenbo
    Straub, Detmar
    Zhang, Pengzhu
    Han, Xiao
    AMCIS 2014 PROCEEDINGS, 2014,
  • [30] A Task Recommendation Model in Mobile Crowdsourcing
    Ji, Yinglei
    Mu, Chunxiao
    Qiu, Xiuqin
    Chen, Yibao
    WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS & MOBILE COMPUTING, 2022, 2022