Model for Individualized Prediction of Breast Cancer Risk After a Benign Breast Biopsy

被引:51
|
作者
Pankratz, V. Shane [1 ]
Degnim, Amy C. [2 ]
Frank, Ryan D. [2 ]
Frost, Marlene H. [2 ]
Visscher, Daniel W. [2 ]
Vierkant, Robert A. [2 ]
Hieken, Tina J. [2 ]
Ghosh, Karthik [2 ]
Tarabishy, Yaman [3 ]
Vachon, Celine M. [2 ]
Radisky, Derek C. [4 ]
Hartmann, Lynn C. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ New Mexico, Hlth Sci Ctr, Albuquerque, NM 87131 USA
[2] Mayo Clin, Rochester, MN USA
[3] Washington Univ, St Louis, MO USA
[4] Mayo Clin, Jacksonville, FL 32224 USA
关键词
MULTIPLE IMPUTATION; DISEASE; WOMEN; VALIDATION;
D O I
10.1200/JCO.2014.55.4865
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose Optimal early detection and prevention for breast cancer depend on accurate identification of women at increased risk. We present a risk prediction model that incorporates histologic features of biopsy tissues from women with benign breast disease (BBD) and compare its performance to the Breast Cancer Risk Assessment Tool (BCRAT). Methods We estimated the age-specific incidence of breast cancer and death from the Mayo BBD cohort and then combined these estimates with a relative risk model derived from 377 patient cases with breast cancer and 734 matched controls sampled from the Mayo BBD cohort to develop the BBD-to-breast cancer (BBD-BC) risk assessment tool. We validated the model using an independent set of 378 patient cases with breast cancer and 728 matched controls from the Mayo BBD cohort and compared the risk predictions from our model with those from the BCRAT. Results The BBD-BC model predicts the probability of breast cancer in women with BBD using tissue-based and other risk factors. The concordance statistic from the BBD-BC model was 0.665 in the model development series and 0.629 in the validation series; these values were higher than those from the BCRAT (0.567 and 0.472, respectively). The BCRAT significantly underpredicted breast cancer risk after benign biopsy (P = .004), whereas the BBD-BC predictions were appropriately calibrated to observed cancers (P = .247). Conclusion We developed a model using both demographic and histologic features to predict breast cancer risk in women with BBD. Our model more accurately classifies a woman's breast cancer risk after a benign biopsy than the BCRAT. (C) 2015 by American Society of Clinical Oncology
引用
收藏
页码:923 / +
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Inflammation markers on benign breast biopsy are associated with risk of invasive breast cancer in African American women
    Asra N. Shaik
    Katrin Kiavash
    Karri Stark
    Julie L. Boerner
    Julie J. Ruterbusch
    Hany Deirawan
    Sudeshna Bandyopadhyay
    Rouba Ali-Fehmi
    Gregory Dyson
    Michele L. Cote
    Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, 2021, 185 : 831 - 839
  • [22] External Validation of the Individualized Prediction of Breast Cancer Survival (IPBS) Model for Estimating Survival after Surgery for Patients with Breast Cancer in Northern Thailand
    Charumporn, Thanapat
    Jarupanich, Nutcha
    Rinthapon, Chanawin
    Meetham, Kantapit
    Pattayakornkul, Napat
    Taerujjirakul, Teerapant
    Tanasombatkul, Krittai
    Ditsatham, Chagkrit
    Chongruksut, Wilaiwan
    Phanphaisarn, Areerak
    Pongnikorn, Donsuk
    Phinyo, Phichayut
    CANCERS, 2022, 14 (23)
  • [23] Attenuation of breast cancer risk in benign breast disease
    Bottrell, Alyssa
    Kapke, Alissa
    Lu, Mei
    Wolman, Sandra
    Worsham, Maria
    CANCER RESEARCH, 2008, 68 (09)
  • [24] Differences in breast cancer risk after benign breast disease by type of screening diagnosis
    Louro, Javier
    Roman, Marta
    Posso, Margarita
    Comerma, Laura
    Vidal, Carmen
    Saladie, Francina
    Alcantara, Rodrigo
    Sanchez, Mar
    Jesus Quintana, M.
    del Riego, Javier
    Ferrer, Joana
    Penalva, Lupe
    Bargallo, Xavier
    Prieto, Miguel
    Sala, Maria
    Castells, Xavier
    BREAST, 2020, 54 : 343 - 348
  • [25] Differences in breast cancer risk after a benign breast disease according to the screening type
    Louro, J.
    Roman, M.
    Posso, M.
    Vidal, C.
    Prieto, M.
    Saladie, F.
    Bare, M.
    Sanchez, M.
    Quintana, M. J.
    Bargallo, X.
    Ferrer, J.
    Penalva, L.
    Sala, M.
    Castells, X.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2020, 138 : S11 - S11
  • [26] PREDICTING THE RISK OF CANCER AT THE TIME OF BREAST BIOPSY - VARIATION IN THE BENIGN TO MALIGNANT RATIO
    SPIVEY, GH
    PERRY, BW
    CLARK, VA
    COULSON, AH
    COULSON, WF
    AMERICAN SURGEON, 1982, 48 (07) : 326 - 332
  • [27] Benign Breast Disease, Mammographic Breast Density, and the Risk of Breast Cancer
    Tice, Jeffrey A.
    OMeara, Ellen S.
    Weaver, Donald L.
    Vachon, Celine
    Ballard-Barbash, Rachel
    Kerlikowske, Karla
    JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2013, 105 (14): : 1043 - 1049
  • [28] UNEXPECTED BREAST-CANCER DETECTION AFTER OUTPATIENT BIOPSY FOR BENIGN LESION
    DIPIETRO, S
    AZZARELLI, A
    MERSON, M
    TUMORI, 1981, 67 (05) : 437 - 441
  • [29] Towards a risk prediction model for breast cancer that utilizes breast tissue risk features
    Pankratz, V. S.
    Degnim, A. C.
    Visscher, D. W.
    Frank, R. D.
    Vierkant, R. A.
    Ghosh, K.
    Aziza, N.
    Vachon, C. M.
    Frost, M.
    Radisky, D. C.
    Hartmann, L. C.
    CANCER RESEARCH, 2012, 72
  • [30] Graphs to estimate an individualized risk of breast cancer
    Benichou, J
    Gail, MH
    Mulvihill, JJ
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1996, 14 (01) : 103 - 110