DIRECT AND INDIRECT EFFECTS OF A POTENTIAL AQUATIC CONTAMINANT ON GRAZER-ALGAE INTERACTIONS

被引:24
|
作者
Evans-White, Michelle A. [1 ]
Lamberti, Gary A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Notre Dame, Dept Biol Sci, Notre Dame, IN 46556 USA
基金
美国海洋和大气管理局;
关键词
1-Butyl-3-methylimidazolium bromide; Toxicity; Ionic liquid; Primary production; Behavior; IMIDAZOLIUM IONIC LIQUIDS; WATER; TOXICITY; PERIPHYTON; IMPACT; PRODUCTIVITY; COMMUNITIES; HERBICIDES; BEHAVIOR; STREAMS;
D O I
10.1897/07-586.1
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Contaminants have direct, harmful effects across multiple ecological scales, including the individual, the community, and the ecosystem levels. Less, however, is known about how indirect effects of contaminants on consumer physiology or behavior might alter community interactions or ecosystem processes. We examined whether a potential aquatic contaminant, an ionic liquid, can indirectly alter benthic algal biomass and primary production through direct effects on herbivorous snails. Ionic liquids are nonvolatile organic salts being considered as an environmentally friendly potential replacement for volatile organic compounds in industry. In two greenhouse experiments, we factorially crossed four concentrations of 1-N-butyl-3-methylimidazolium bromide (bmimBr; experiment 1: 0 or 10 mg/L; experiment 2: 0, 1, or 100 mg/L) with the presence or absence of the snail Physa acuta in aquatic mesocosms. Experimental results were weighted by their respective control (no bmimBr or P. acuta) and combined for statistical analysis. When both bmimBr and snails were present, chlorophyll a abundance and algal biovolume were higher than would be expected if both factors acted additively. In addition, snail growth rates, relative to those of controls, declined by 41 to 101% at 10 and 100 mg/L of bmimBr. Taken together, these two results suggest that snails were less efficient grazers in the presence of bmimBr, resulting in release of algae from the grazer control. Snails stimulated periphyton primary production in the absence, but not in the presence, of bmimBr, suggesting that bmimBr also can indirectly alter ecosystem function. These findings suggest that sublethal contaminant levels can negatively impact communities and ecosystem processes via complex interactions, and they provide baseline information regarding the potential effects of an emergent industrial chemical on aquatic systems.
引用
收藏
页码:418 / 426
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Direct and indirect transgenerational effects alter plant-herbivore interactions
    Casey P. terHorst
    Jennifer A. Lau
    Evolutionary Ecology, 2012, 26 : 1469 - 1480
  • [32] Direct and indirect toxic effects of cotton-derived cellulose nanofibres on filamentous green algae
    Munk, Michele
    Brandao, Humberto M.
    Nowak, Sophie
    Mouton, Ludovic
    Gern, Juliana C.
    Guimaraes, Alessandro S.
    Yepremian, Claude
    Coute, Alain
    Raposo, Nadia R. B.
    Marconcini, Jose M.
    Brayner, Roberta
    ECOTOXICOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL SAFETY, 2015, 122 : 399 - 405
  • [33] Differential effects of climate and species interactions on range limits at a hybrid zone: potential direct and indirect impacts of climate change
    McQuillan, Michael A.
    Rice, Amber M.
    ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION, 2015, 5 (21): : 5120 - 5137
  • [34] Seagrass response to CO2 contingent on epiphytic algae: indirect effects can overwhelm direct effects
    Owen W. Burnell
    Bayden D. Russell
    Andrew D. Irving
    Sean D. Connell
    Oecologia, 2014, 176 : 871 - 882
  • [35] Seagrass response to CO2 contingent on epiphytic algae: indirect effects can overwhelm direct effects
    Burnell, Owen W.
    Russell, Bayden D.
    Irving, Andrew D.
    Connell, Sean D.
    OECOLOGIA, 2014, 176 (03) : 871 - 882
  • [36] Direct and indirect effects of native plants and herbivores on biotic resistance to alien aquatic plant invasions
    Petruzzella, Antonella
    van Leeuwen, Casper H. A.
    van Donk, Ellen
    Bakker, Elisabeth S.
    JOURNAL OF ECOLOGY, 2020, 108 (04) : 1487 - 1496
  • [37] Prey subsidy or predator cue? Direct and indirect effects of caged predators on aquatic consumers and resources
    Costa, Zacharia J.
    Vonesh, James R.
    OECOLOGIA, 2013, 173 (04) : 1481 - 1490
  • [38] Prey subsidy or predator cue? Direct and indirect effects of caged predators on aquatic consumers and resources
    Zacharia J. Costa
    James R. Vonesh
    Oecologia, 2013, 173 : 1481 - 1490
  • [39] Barnacles, limpets and periwinkles: the effects of direct and indirect interactions on cyprid settlement and success
    Holmes, SP
    Walker, G
    van der Meer, J
    JOURNAL OF SEA RESEARCH, 2005, 53 (03) : 181 - 204
  • [40] Analysis of protein-protein interactions by mutagenesis: direct versus indirect effects
    Otzen, DE
    Fersht, AR
    PROTEIN ENGINEERING, 1999, 12 (01): : 41 - 45