The Eurasian Economic Union: integration without liberalisation?

被引:12
|
作者
Dragneva, Rilka [1 ]
Hartwell, Christopher A. [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Birmingham, Birmingham Law Sch, Birmingham, W Midlands, England
[2] Bournemouth Univ, Dept Accounting Finance & Econ, Poole, Dorset, England
[3] Kozminski Univ, Dept Int Management, Warsaw, Poland
关键词
Trade liberalisation; Eurasian Union; regional integration; non-tariff barriers; REGIONAL-INTEGRATION; TARIFFS; ACCESSION; BYELARUS; UKRAINE;
D O I
10.1080/14631377.2020.1793586
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The Eurasian Economic Union (EaEU) came into being in 2015 with the ostensible goal of increasing integration among its member states. An implicit assumption behind this goal was to further trade liberalisation, at least within the bloc, as a means to promote additional trade. This paper assesses the development of the EaEU against this promise. Going beyond an analysis of the dynamics of mutual trade, the main focus of this paper is to understand the EaEU's institutional processes, examining if the commitments and framework put in place by the EaEU could actually contribute to trade liberalisation. Focusing on the trade policies at the level of the EaEU and the political economy of protectionism, our assessment is not favourable. In particular, the charge that the EaEU remains a geopolitical rather than economic project rings true, as trade liberalisation has been halting in individual member states and across the bloc as a whole. This reality is further illustrated in the external trade policies of the Union, most prominently in trade agreements concluded with Vietnam, Iran, Singapore and Serbia, and relations with other major trade partners. The paper argues that, in line with often overlooked theoretical predictions, the institutional framework of the EaEU is not robust enough to ensure that integration processes actually deliver on their stated objectives.
引用
下载
收藏
页码:200 / 221
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Consequences of the integration to the Eurasian Economic Union: methodology of statistical evaluation and first results
    Tikhonova, Anna
    Melnikova, Nadezhda
    Lukacs, Eszter
    ECONOMIC ANNALS-XXI, 2018, 170 (3-4): : 4 - 9
  • [32] A Eurasian (or a Soviet) Union? Consequences of further economic integration in the Commonwealth of Independent States
    Hartwell, Christopher A.
    BUSINESS HORIZONS, 2013, 56 (04) : 411 - 420
  • [33] Russia-Belarus integration interaction in the context of the development of the Eurasian Economic Union
    Kozmenko, Vladimir M.
    Toktamysov, Saken Zh
    Shamishev, Erlan D.
    REVISTA DE LA UNIVERSIDAD DEL ZULIA, 2020, 11 (31): : 195 - 222
  • [34] Bureaucratic Authority and Mimesis: The Eurasian Economic Union's Multiple Integration Logics
    Staeger, Ueli
    Bobocea, Cristian
    INTERNATIONAL SPECTATOR, 2018, 53 (03): : 38 - 54
  • [35] The Eurasian Economic Union in Search of Strategic Partners: The Gravity Effects of Integration Blocs
    Garashchuk, Anna
    Rivera, Pablo Podadera
    Isla-Castillo, Fernando
    PANOECONOMICUS, 2023, 70 (01) : 155 - 179
  • [36] INTEGRATION AND DEVELOPMENT OF THE DAIRY REGIONS IN THE EURASIAN ECONOMIC UNION: TRENDS, PROBLEMS AND PROSPECTS
    Raskaliyev, T. H.
    Yesmagulova, N. D.
    Digilina, O. B.
    EKONOMIKA REGIONA-ECONOMY OF REGION, 2019, 15 (02): : 547 - 560
  • [37] COVID-19 as a Test for Regional Integration Resilience in the Eurasian Economic Union
    Nikitina, Yulia
    Arapova, Ekaterina
    PROBLEMS OF POST-COMMUNISM, 2022, 69 (01) : 26 - 35
  • [38] Factors for Increasing the Competitiveness of the Countries of the Eurasian Economic Union and Other Integration Associations
    Mukhamediyev, Bulat
    Ilyassova, Zhansaya
    Kalieva, Assem
    INNOVATION MANAGEMENT AND EDUCATION EXCELLENCE THROUGH VISION 2020, VOLS I -XI, 2018, : 4179 - 4191
  • [39] NEW ECONOMIC DIMENSION OF THE EURASIAN ECONOMIC UNION
    Czerewacz-Filipowicz, Katarzyna
    ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT (ESD), 2016, : 567 - 576