Assessment of adherence to the CONSORT statement for quality of reports on randomized controlled trial abstracts from four high-impact general medical journals

被引:100
|
作者
Ghimire, Saurav [1 ]
Kyung, Eunjung [1 ]
Kang, Wonku [2 ]
Kim, Eunyoung [1 ]
机构
[1] Chungnam Natl Univ, Dept Clin Pharm, Coll Pharm, Taejon 305764, South Korea
[2] Yeungnam Univ, Coll Pharm, Kyungbuk 712749, South Korea
关键词
Randomized controlled trials; CONSORT for abstracts; Quality of reports; General medical journals; STRUCTURED ABSTRACTS; RECOMMENDATIONS; EXPLANATION; ADOPTION; NEEDS;
D O I
10.1186/1745-6215-13-77
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Background: The extended Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) Statement for Abstracts was developed to improve the quality of reports of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) because readers often base their assessment of a trial solely on the abstract. To date, few data exist regarding whether it has achieved this goal. We evaluated the extent of adherence to the CONSORT for Abstract statement for quality of reports on RCT abstracts by four high-impact general medical journals. Methods: A descriptive analysis of published RCT abstracts in The New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM), The Lancet, The Journal of American Medical Association (JAMA), and the British Medical Journal (BMJ) in the year 2010 was conducted by two reviewers, independently extracting data from a MEDLINE/PubMed search. Results: We identified 271 potential RCT abstracts meeting our inclusion criteria. More than half of the abstracts identified the study as randomized in the title (58.7%; 159/271), reported the specific objective/hypothesis (72.7%; 197/271), described participant eligibility criteria with settings for data collection (60.9%; 165/271), detailed the interventions for both groups (90.8%; 246/271), and clearly defined the primary outcome (94.8%; 257/271). However, the methodological quality domains were inadequately reported: allocation concealment (11.8%; 32/271) and details of blinding (21.0%; 57/271). Reporting the primary outcome results for each group was done in 84.1% (228/271). Almost all of the abstracts reported trial registration (99.3%; 269/271), whereas reports of funding and of harm or side effects from the interventions were found in only 47.6% (129/271) and 42.8% (116/271) of the abstracts, respectively. Conclusions: These findings show inconsistencies and non-adherence to the CONSORT for abstract guidelines, especially in the methodological quality domains. Improvements in the quality of RCT reports can be expected by adhering to existing standards and guidelines as expressed by the CONSORT group.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 48 条
  • [31] Abstracts reporting of HIV/AIDS randomized controlled trials in general medicine and infectious diseases journals: completeness to date and improvement in the quality since CONSORT extension for abstracts
    Jean Joel R. Bigna
    Jean Jacques N. Noubiap
    Serra Lem Asangbeh
    Lewis N. Um
    Paule Sandra D. Sime
    Elvis Temfack
    Mathurin Cyrille Tejiokem
    [J]. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 16
  • [32] Abstracts reporting of HIV/AIDS randomized controlled trials in general medicine and infectious diseases journals: completeness to date and improvement in the quality since CONSORT extension for abstracts
    Bigna, Jean Joel R.
    Noubiap, Jean Jacques N.
    Asangbeh, Serra Lem
    Um, Lewis N.
    Sime, Paule Sandra D.
    Temfack, Elvis
    Tejiokem, Mathurin Cyrille
    [J]. BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY, 2016, 16
  • [33] Statistical robustness of randomized controlled trials in high-impact journals has improved but was low across medical specialties
    Kampman, Jasper M.
    Turgman, Oren
    Weiland, Nicolaas H. Sperna
    Hollmann, Markus W.
    Repping, Sjoerd
    Hermanides, Jeroen
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2022, 150 : 165 - 170
  • [34] A comparison of quality of abstracts of systematic reviews including meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials in high-impact general medicine journals before and after the publication of PRISMA extension for abstracts: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Bigna J.J.R.
    Um L.N.
    Nansseu J.R.N.
    [J]. Systematic Reviews, 5 (1)
  • [35] Methodological Reporting Quality of Randomized Controlled Trials in 3 Leading Diabetes Journals From 2011 to 2013 Following CONSORT Statement A System Review
    Zhai, Xiao
    Wang, Yiran
    Mu, Qingchun
    Chen, Xiao
    Huang, Qin
    Wang, Qijin
    Li, Ming
    [J]. MEDICINE, 2015, 94 (27) : e1083
  • [36] A Systematic Review of Reporting Standards of Pilot Randomized Controlled Trials in High Impact Anesthesiology Journals and their Adherence to CONSORT-pilot extension Guidelines
    Shanthanna, Harsha
    Kaushal, Alka
    Mbuagbaw, Lawrence
    Couban, Rachel
    Thabane, Lehana
    [J]. ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2017, 124 : 265 - 267
  • [37] Underrepresentation of Women as Clinical Trialists in Heart Failure: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials Published in High-impact Medical Journals
    Whitelaw, Sera
    Sullivan, Kristen
    Van Spall, Harriette G.
    [J]. CIRCULATION, 2020, 142
  • [38] Quality assessment of randomized controlled trial abstracts on drug therapy of periodontal disease from the abstracts published in dental Science Citation Indexed journals in the last ten years
    Xie, Lingzhi
    Qin, Wenguang
    Yu, Ting
    Pathak, Janak L.
    Zeng, Sujuan
    Du, Minquan
    [J]. MEDICINA ORAL PATOLOGIA ORAL Y CIRUGIA BUCAL, 2020, 25 (05): : E626 - E633
  • [39] The effects of strengthening and high-impact exercises on bone metabolism and quality of life in postmenopausal women: A randomized controlled trial
    Basat, Hande
    Esmaeilzadeh, Sina
    Eskiyurt, Nurten
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BACK AND MUSCULOSKELETAL REHABILITATION, 2013, 26 (04) : 427 - 435
  • [40] Gains in hip bone mass from high-impact training are maintained: A randomized controlled trial in children
    Fuchs, RK
    Snow, CM
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PEDIATRICS, 2002, 141 (03): : 357 - 362