Assessment of adherence to the CONSORT statement for quality of reports on randomized controlled trial abstracts from four high-impact general medical journals

被引:100
|
作者
Ghimire, Saurav [1 ]
Kyung, Eunjung [1 ]
Kang, Wonku [2 ]
Kim, Eunyoung [1 ]
机构
[1] Chungnam Natl Univ, Dept Clin Pharm, Coll Pharm, Taejon 305764, South Korea
[2] Yeungnam Univ, Coll Pharm, Kyungbuk 712749, South Korea
关键词
Randomized controlled trials; CONSORT for abstracts; Quality of reports; General medical journals; STRUCTURED ABSTRACTS; RECOMMENDATIONS; EXPLANATION; ADOPTION; NEEDS;
D O I
10.1186/1745-6215-13-77
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Background: The extended Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) Statement for Abstracts was developed to improve the quality of reports of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) because readers often base their assessment of a trial solely on the abstract. To date, few data exist regarding whether it has achieved this goal. We evaluated the extent of adherence to the CONSORT for Abstract statement for quality of reports on RCT abstracts by four high-impact general medical journals. Methods: A descriptive analysis of published RCT abstracts in The New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM), The Lancet, The Journal of American Medical Association (JAMA), and the British Medical Journal (BMJ) in the year 2010 was conducted by two reviewers, independently extracting data from a MEDLINE/PubMed search. Results: We identified 271 potential RCT abstracts meeting our inclusion criteria. More than half of the abstracts identified the study as randomized in the title (58.7%; 159/271), reported the specific objective/hypothesis (72.7%; 197/271), described participant eligibility criteria with settings for data collection (60.9%; 165/271), detailed the interventions for both groups (90.8%; 246/271), and clearly defined the primary outcome (94.8%; 257/271). However, the methodological quality domains were inadequately reported: allocation concealment (11.8%; 32/271) and details of blinding (21.0%; 57/271). Reporting the primary outcome results for each group was done in 84.1% (228/271). Almost all of the abstracts reported trial registration (99.3%; 269/271), whereas reports of funding and of harm or side effects from the interventions were found in only 47.6% (129/271) and 42.8% (116/271) of the abstracts, respectively. Conclusions: These findings show inconsistencies and non-adherence to the CONSORT for abstract guidelines, especially in the methodological quality domains. Improvements in the quality of RCT reports can be expected by adhering to existing standards and guidelines as expressed by the CONSORT group.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 48 条
  • [1] Assessment of adherence to the CONSORT statement for quality of reports on randomized controlled trial abstracts from four high-impact general medical journals
    Saurav Ghimire
    Eunjung Kyung
    Wonku Kang
    Eunyoung Kim
    [J]. Trials, 13
  • [2] Professional medical writing support (PMWS) and the reporting quality of randomized controlled trial (RCT) abstracts among high-impact general medical journals
    Mills, Ira
    Sheard, Catherine
    Hays, Meredith
    Douglas, Kevin
    Winchester, Christopher C.
    Gattrell, William T.
    [J]. CURRENT MEDICAL RESEARCH AND OPINION, 2017, 33 : 18 - 18
  • [3] Reporting quality of randomised controlled trial abstracts among high-impact general medical journals: a review and analysis
    Hays, Meredith
    Andrews, Mary
    Wilson, Ramey
    Callender, David
    O'Malley, Patrick G.
    Douglas, Kevin
    [J]. BMJ OPEN, 2016, 6 (07):
  • [4] Comparison of the Quality of Pediatric Randomized Controlled Trials Published in Both Nursing and Medical Journals: Adherence to the CONSORT Statement
    Devos, Flora
    Ibrahim, Nour
    Foissac, Frantz
    Bouazza, Naim
    Ancel, Pierre-Yves
    Chappuy, Helene
    Elie, Caroline
    Treluyer, Jean-Marc
    [J]. WORLDVIEWS ON EVIDENCE-BASED NURSING, 2018, 15 (06) : 447 - 454
  • [5] An assessment of the compliance of randomized controlled trials published in two high impact journals with the CONSORT statement
    Susvirkar, Akshay
    Gada, Parth
    Figer, Brinal
    Thaker, Saket
    Thatte, Urmila M.
    Gogtay, Nithya J.
    [J]. NATIONAL MEDICAL JOURNAL OF INDIA, 2018, 31 (02): : 79 - 82
  • [6] Quality of Reports on Randomized Controlled Trials Conducted in Japan: Evaluation of Adherence to the CONSORT Statement
    Uetani, Kae
    Nakayama, Takeo
    Ikai, Hiroshi
    Yonemoto, Naohiro
    Moher, David
    [J]. INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2009, 48 (05) : 307 - 313
  • [7] The quality of randomized trial reporting in leading medical journals since the revised CONSORT statement
    Mills, EJ
    Wu, P
    Gagnier, J
    Devereaux, PJ
    [J]. CONTEMPORARY CLINICAL TRIALS, 2005, 26 (04) : 480 - 487
  • [8] Reporting Quality in Abstracts of Randomized Controlled Trials Published in High-Impact Occupational Therapy Journals
    Fernandez-Pires, Paula
    Prieto-Botella, Daniel
    Valera-Gran, Desiree
    Hurtado-Pomares, Miriam
    Espinosa-Sempere, Cristina
    Sanchez-Perez, Alicia
    Juarez-Leal, Iris
    Peral-Gomez, Paula
    Moreno-Campos, Leticia
    Navarrete-Munoz, Eva-Maria
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY, 2022, 76 (04):
  • [9] Reporting quality of randomized controlled trial abstracts published in leading laser medicine journals: an assessment using the CONSORT for abstracts guidelines
    Lu Jin
    Fang Hua
    Qiang Cao
    [J]. Lasers in Medical Science, 2016, 31 : 1583 - 1590
  • [10] Reporting quality of randomized controlled trial abstracts published in leading laser medicine journals: an assessment using the CONSORT for abstracts guidelines
    Jin, Lu
    Hua, Fang
    Cao, Qiang
    [J]. LASERS IN MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2016, 31 (08) : 1583 - 1590