Facilitating action planning within audit and feedback interventions: a mixed-methods process evaluation of an action implementation toolbox in intensive care

被引:10
|
作者
Gude, Wouter T. [1 ]
Roos-Blom, Marie-Jose [1 ,3 ]
van der Veer, Sabine N. [4 ]
Dongelmans, Dave A. [2 ]
de Jonge, Evert [5 ]
Peek, Niels [4 ,6 ]
de Keizer, Nicolette F. [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Amsterdam, Amsterdam Publ Hlth Res Inst, Amsterdam UMC, Dept Med Informat, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Univ Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Dept Intens Care Med, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[3] Natl Intens Care Evaluat NICE Fdn, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[4] Univ Manchester, Manchester Acad Hlth Sci Ctr, Fac Biol Med & Hlth, Ctr Hlth Informat,Div Informat Imaging & Data Sci, Manchester, Lancs, England
[5] Leiden Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Intens Care Med, Leiden, Netherlands
[6] Univ Manchester, Manchester Acad Hlth Sci Ctr, NIHR Greater Manchester Primary Care Patient Safe, Manchester, Lancs, England
关键词
Intensive care; Medical audit; Feedback; Quality improvement; Quality indicators; IMPROVE; QUALITY; MANAGEMENT; BEHAVIOR; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1186/s13012-019-0937-8
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Audit and feedback (A&F) is more effective if it facilitates action planning, but little is known about how best to do this. We developed an electronic A&F intervention with an action implementation toolbox to improve pain management in intensive care units (ICUs); the toolbox contained suggested actions for improvement. A head-to-head randomised trial demonstrated that the toolbox moderately increased the intervention's effectiveness when compared with A&F only. Objective: To understand the mechanisms through which A&F with action implementation toolbox facilitates action planning by ICUs to increase A&F effectiveness. Methods: We extracted all individual actions from action plans developed by ICUs that received A&F with (n = 10) and without (n = 11) toolbox for 6 months and classified them using Clinical Performance Feedback Intervention Theory. We held semi-structured interviews with participants during the trial. We compared the number and type of planned and completed actions between study groups and explored barriers and facilitators to effective action planning. Results: ICUs with toolbox planned more actions directly aimed at improving practice (p = 0.037) and targeted a wider range of practice determinants compared to ICUs without toolbox. ICUs with toolbox also completed more actions during the study period, but not significantly (p = 0.142). ICUs without toolbox reported more difficulties in identifying what actions they could take. Regardless of the toolbox, all ICUs still experienced barriers relating to the feedback (low controllability, accuracy) and organisational context (competing priorities, resources, cost). Conclusions: The toolbox helped health professionals to broaden their mindset about actions they could take to change clinical practice. Without the toolbox, professionals tended to focus more on feedback verification and exploring solutions without developing intentions for actual change. All feedback recipients experienced organisational barriers that inhibited eventual completion of actions.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Facilitating action planning within audit and feedback interventions: a mixed-methods process evaluation of an action implementation toolbox in intensive care
    Wouter T. Gude
    Marie-José Roos-Blom
    Sabine N. van der Veer
    Dave A. Dongelmans
    Evert de Jonge
    Niels Peek
    Nicolette F. de Keizer
    [J]. Implementation Science, 14
  • [2] A Mixed-Methods Approach to Climate Action Planning
    Quinlivan, Lauren
    Dunphy, Niall
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF QUALITATIVE METHODS, 2023, 22
  • [3] Electronic audit and feedback intervention with action implementation toolbox to improve pain management in intensive care: protocol for a laboratory experiment and cluster randomised trial
    Wouter T. Gude
    Marie-José Roos-Blom
    Sabine N. van der Veer
    Evert de Jonge
    Niels Peek
    Dave A. Dongelmans
    Nicolette F. de Keizer
    [J]. Implementation Science, 12
  • [4] Electronic audit and feedback intervention with action implementation toolbox to improve pain management in intensive care: protocol for a laboratory experiment and cluster randomised trial
    Gude, Wouter T.
    Roos-Blom, Marie-Jose
    van der Veer, Sabine N.
    de Jonge, Evert
    Peek, Niels
    Dongelmans, Dave A.
    de Keizer, Nicolette F.
    [J]. IMPLEMENTATION SCIENCE, 2017, 12
  • [5] Implementation of the mental health Gap Action Programme (mhGAP) within the Fijian Healthcare System: a mixed-methods evaluation
    Charlson, Fiona
    Chang, Odille
    Kubuabola, Ilisapeci
    Schess, Jaclyn
    Latu, Catherine
    Hunter, Ernest
    Tukana, Isimeli
    Qaloewai, Sefanaia
    Shidhaye, Rahul
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MENTAL HEALTH SYSTEMS, 2019, 13 (1)
  • [6] Implementation of the mental health Gap Action Programme (mhGAP) within the Fijian Healthcare System: a mixed-methods evaluation
    Fiona Charlson
    Odille Chang
    Ilisapeci Kubuabola
    Jaclyn Schess
    Catherine Latu
    Ernest Hunter
    Isimeli Tukana
    Sefanaia Qaloewai
    Rahul Shidhaye
    [J]. International Journal of Mental Health Systems, 13
  • [7] A Mixed-Methods Comparison of Interventions to Increase Advance Care Planning
    Tietbohl, Caroline K.
    Ritger, Carly
    Jordan, Sarah
    Shanbhag, Prajakta
    Sudore, Rebecca L.
    Lum, Hillary D.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN BOARD OF FAMILY MEDICINE, 2024, 37 (02) : 215 - 227
  • [8] Development and implementation of primary nursing in the intensive care unit: evaluation in mixed-methods design
    Krueger, Lars
    Wefer, Franziska
    Mannebach, Thomas
    Zwiener, Christoph
    Beyer, Denis
    Ramos y Soto, Andre
    Lohmeier, Sarah
    Teigeler, Jonathan
    Wittemeier, Christine
    Rinsche, Nicole
    Siegling, Christian
    Mertins, Esther
    Schramm, Rene
    Langer, Gero
    [J]. PFLEGE, 2024, 37 (05): : 275 - 283
  • [9] Implementation of the VA Intensive Dysphagia Treatment Program: A Mixed-Methods Evaluation
    Yee, Joanne
    Pulia, Michael
    Knobloch, Mary Jo
    Martinez, Rachael
    Daggett, Sarah
    Smith, Bridget
    Musson, Nan
    Rogus-Pulia, Nicole
    [J]. HEALTH SERVICES INSIGHTS, 2022, 15
  • [10] Evaluation of the Implementation Process of a Family Systems Nursing Approach in Home Health Care: A Mixed-Methods Study
    Pusa, Susanna
    Isaksson, Ulf
    Sundin, Karin
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FAMILY NURSING, 2021, 27 (03) : 235 - 249