Nutrient management behavior on Wisconsin dairy farms

被引:16
|
作者
Powell, J. M.
Jackson-Smith, D. B.
McCrory, D. F.
Saam, H.
Mariola, M.
机构
[1] USDA ARS, US Dairy Forage Res Ctr, Madison, WI 53706 USA
[2] Utah State Univ, Dept Sociol Social Work & Anthropol, Logan, UT 84322 USA
[3] Univ Wisconsin, Dept Soil Sci, Madison, WI 53706 USA
[4] Ohio State Univ, Rural Sociol Program, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
关键词
D O I
10.2134/agronj2006.0116
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Nutrient management plans for livestock operations should account for rates and timing of manure application to cropland, as well as how manure is integrated with other nutrient sources. Little is known, however, about actual nutrient management behavior of farmers, and what changes may be needed for farmers to adhere to nutrient management regulations. Detailed records were kept on fertilizer, manure, and legume N and P applications on 33 representative Wisconsin dairy farms during the period October 2003 through September 2004. Average available N applications ranged from 118 to 200 kg ha(-1) of which 40% was derived from fertilizer, 30% from manure and 30% from previous legume. On a regional basis, the following percentages of corn (Zea mays L.) area fell within available N application categories of 0, 1 to 80, 81 to 160, 161 to 240 and > 240 kg ha(-1), respectively: in the Northeast (NE) region, < 1, 26, 33, 21, and 19% of the total corn area surveyed (504 ha); in the South-Central (SC) region, < 1, 39, 41, 14, and 5% of the corn area (576 ha); and in the Southwest (SW) region, 0, 31, 45, 14, and 10% of the corn area (180 ha). Average available P applications ranged from 16 to 18 kg ha(-1), of which 65% came from manure and 35% from fertilizer. On a regional basis, the following percentages of surveyed cropland area fell within available P application categories of 0, 1 to 24, 25 to 48, 49 to 72 and > 72 kg ha(-1), respectively: in the NE region, 30, 50, 15, 4, and 1% of the cropland area (1340 ha); in the SC region, 23, 54, 17, 5, and 1% of the cropland area (1168 ha); and in the SW region, 41, 48, 8, 1, and 2% of the cropland area (542 ha). Of the total cropland area (ha) across all regions that received manure during winter, 7 to 25% were within regulated surface water buffer zones. In the NE, SC, and SW regions, 100, 83, and 63% of winter-spread cropland area received available P application rates < 24 kg ha(-1), the 1-yr crop P replacement ceiling set by State regulations. Regional differences in nutrient management behavior due to topography, soils and other factors should be used to better target efforts aimed at improving fertilizer-manure-legume management on Wisconsin dairy farms.
引用
收藏
页码:211 / 219
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The relevance of spatial scales in nutrient balances on dairy farms
    van Leeuwen, Maricke M. W. J.
    van Middelaar, Corina E.
    Oenema, Jouke
    van Dam, Jos C.
    Stoorvogel, Jetse J.
    Stoof, Cathelijne R.
    de Boer, Imke J. M.
    [J]. AGRICULTURE ECOSYSTEMS & ENVIRONMENT, 2019, 269 : 125 - 139
  • [32] COVID-19 Awareness and Preparedness of Minnesota and Wisconsin Dairy Farms
    Yung, Mung Ting
    Vazquez, RosaI Chela
    Liebman, Amy
    Brihn, Auguste
    Olson, Anna
    Loken, Delaney
    Contreras-Smith, Ana
    Bender, Jeff
    Kirsch, Jonathan D.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF AGROMEDICINE, 2021, 26 (03) : 352 - 359
  • [33] Differences between expanding and non-expanding Wisconsin dairy farms
    Janowski, J. M.
    Cabrera, V. E.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 2010, 93 : 411 - 411
  • [34] From cold to hot: Climatic effects and productivity in Wisconsin dairy farms
    Qi, L.
    Bravo-Ureta, B. E.
    Cabrera, V. E.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 2015, 98 (12) : 8664 - 8677
  • [35] Factors Affecting Manure Applications as Directed by Nutrient Management Plans at Four Connecticut Dairy Farms
    Tao, Haiying
    Morris, Thomas F.
    Bravo-Ureta, Boris E.
    Meinert, Richard
    [J]. AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 2014, 106 (04) : 1420 - 1426
  • [36] CH4 emissions from cubicle houses on dairy farms with advanced nutrient management
    in 't Veld, JWHH
    Monteny, GJ
    [J]. INTERACTIONS BETWEEN CLIMATE AND ANIMAL PRODUCTION, 2003, (07): : 116 - 116
  • [37] A Partial Budget Analysis for Phosphorus-Based Nutrient Management Plans for Connecticut Dairy Farms
    Tao, Haiying
    Morris, Thomas F.
    Bravo-Ureta, Boris
    Meinert, Richard
    Zanger, Kelly
    Neafsey, Joseph
    [J]. AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 2010, 102 (01) : 231 - 240
  • [38] Actions and outcomes of Wisconsin dairy farms completing milk quality teams
    Rodrigues, ACO
    Ruegg, PL
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 2005, 88 (07) : 2672 - 2680
  • [39] Nutrient cycling on dairy farms in the Netherlands: The role of farm structure, management and trade-offs
    van Loon, Marloes P.
    Hijbeek, Renske
    Vonk, Wytse J.
    Oenema, Jouke
    [J]. RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING, 2024, 211
  • [40] Milking as a management tool on dairy farms
    Guinard-Flament, J.
    Marnet, P. -G.
    Verdier-Metz, I.
    Hurtaud, C.
    Montel, M. -C.
    Stelwagen, K.
    Pomies, D.
    [J]. INRA PRODUCTIONS ANIMALES, 2013, 26 (02): : 193 - 205