Evolution of salmon lice in response to management strategies: a review

被引:41
|
作者
Coates, Andrew [1 ,2 ]
Phillips, Ben L. [2 ]
Bui, Samantha [3 ]
Oppedal, Frode [3 ]
Robinson, Nick A. [1 ,4 ]
Dempster, Tim [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Melbourne, Sch BioSci, Sustainable Aquaculture Lab Temperate & Trop SALT, Melbourne, Vic 3010, Australia
[2] Univ Melbourne, Sch BioSci, Spatial Ecol & Evolut Lab SPEEL, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[3] Inst Marine Res, Matre Aquaculture Res Stn, Matredal, Norway
[4] Nofima, Breeding & Genet, As, Norway
关键词
Atlantic salmon; Lepeophtheirus salmonis; parasite; resistance; Salmo salar;
D O I
10.1111/raq.12528
中图分类号
S9 [水产、渔业];
学科分类号
0908 ;
摘要
Ectoparasitic salmon lice (Lepeophtheirus salmonis) present a major challenge to Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) aquaculture. The demand for effective louse control has produced diverse management strategies. These strategies essentially impose novel selection pressures on parasite populations, driving the evolution of resistance. Here we assess the potential for salmon lice to adapt to current prevention and control methods. Lice have evolved resistance to at least four of five chemical therapeutants, and use of these chemicals has declined significantly in recent years. The industry has shifted to alternative non-chemical approaches, yet lice may adapt to these as well. Early research suggests that phenotypic variation exists in the louse population upon which non-chemical selection pressures could act and that this variation may have a genetic basis. From the existing evidence, as well as an examination of evolutionary processes in other relevant parasite and pest systems, we conclude that the evolution of non-chemical resistance is an emergent concern that must be considered by the industry. We recommend areas for focused research to better assess this risk. It is also important to determine whether phenotypic shifts in response to non-chemical selection may shift the ecological niche of the parasite, as this may have cascading effects on wild salmon populations. We also recommend further research to identify strategy combinations that have antagonistic selective effects that slow louse evolution and those with synergistic effects that should be avoided. Greater understanding of evolutionary processes can inform aquaculture policies that counteract the rise of resistant parasite populations.
引用
收藏
页码:1397 / 1422
页数:26
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Effects of salmon lice infection and salmon lice protection on fjord migrating Atlantic salmon and brown trout post-smolts
    Rolf Sivertsgård
    Eva B. Thorstad
    Finn Økland
    Bengt Finstad
    Pål Arne Bjørn
    Niels Jepsen
    Trude Nordal
    R. Scott McKinley
    Hydrobiologia, 2007, 582 : 35 - 42
  • [22] Effects of salmon lice infection and salmon lice protection on fjord migrating Atlantic salmon and brown trout post-smolts
    Sivertsgard, Rolf
    Thorstad, Eva B.
    Okland, Finn
    Finstad, Bengt
    Bjorn, Pal Arne
    Jepsen, Niels
    Nordal, Trude
    McKinley, R. Scott
    HYDROBIOLOGIA, 2007, 582 (1) : 35 - 42
  • [23] Reproductive strategies of Atlantic salmon: Ecology and evolution
    Fleming, IA
    REVIEWS IN FISH BIOLOGY AND FISHERIES, 1996, 6 (04) : 379 - 416
  • [24] Analysis and management of resistance to chemotherapeutants in salmon lice, Lepeophtheirus salmonis (Copepoda: Caligidae)
    Denholm, I
    Devine, GJ
    Horsberg, TE
    Sevatdal, S
    Fallang, A
    Nolan, DV
    Powell, R
    PEST MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2002, 58 (06) : 528 - 536
  • [25] Prevention not cure: a review of methods to avoid sea lice infestations in salmon aquaculture
    Barrett, Luke T.
    Oppedal, Frode
    Robinson, Nick
    Dempster, Tim
    REVIEWS IN AQUACULTURE, 2020, 12 (04) : 2527 - 2543
  • [26] A modeling study of the impact of treatment policies on the evolution of resistance in sea lice on salmon farms
    Trombetta, Enrico
    Jakubiak, Sara
    Kutkova, Sara
    Lipschutz, Debby
    O'Hare, Anthony
    Enright, Jessica A.
    PLOS ONE, 2023, 18 (11):
  • [27] Sea trout adapt their migratory behaviour in response to high salmon lice concentrations
    Halttunen, E.
    Gjelland, K-O
    Hamel, S.
    Serra-Llinares, R-M
    Nilsen, R.
    Arechavala-Lopez, P.
    Skarohamar, J.
    Johnsen, I. A.
    Asplin, L.
    Karlsen, O.
    Bjorn, P-A
    Finstad, B.
    JOURNAL OF FISH DISEASES, 2018, 41 (06) : 953 - 967
  • [28] Evolution of virulence under intensive farming: salmon lice increase skin lesions and reduce host growth in salmon farms
    Ugelvik, M. S.
    Skorping, A.
    Moberg, O.
    Mennerat, A.
    JOURNAL OF EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY, 2017, 30 (06) : 1136 - 1142
  • [29] Sea lice removal by cleaner fish in salmon aquaculture: a review of the evidence base
    Overton, Kathy
    Barrett, Luke T.
    Oppedal, Frode
    Kristiansen, Tore S.
    Dempster, Tim
    AQUACULTURE ENVIRONMENT INTERACTIONS, 2020, 12 : 31 - 44
  • [30] The Cost of Lice: Quantifying the Impacts of Parasitic Sea Lice on Farmed Salmon
    Abolofia, Jay
    Wilen, James E.
    Asche, Frank
    MARINE RESOURCE ECONOMICS, 2017, 32 (03) : 329 - 349