Ecogeographical patterns of body size differ among North American paper wasp species

被引:11
|
作者
Miller, S. E. [1 ]
Sheehan, M. J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Cornell Univ, Dept Neurobiol & Behav, 215 Tower Rd, Ithaca, NY 14853 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Bergmann’ s rule; Temperature size rule; James’ rule; Social wasps; POLISTES-METRICUS HYMENOPTERA; DOMINANCE HIERARCHIES; PHYLOGENETIC SIGNAL; COLDER ENVIRONMENTS; VESPIDAE; TEMPERATURE; GENUS; ASSOCIATIONS; ECTOTHERMS; DOMINULUS;
D O I
10.1007/s00040-020-00796-z
中图分类号
Q96 [昆虫学];
学科分类号
摘要
Species with widespread distributions frequently show clines in body size across broad geographic areas. These clines may be the result of "ecogeographical rules" that describe spatial patterns of phenotypic differences driven by environmental variation. Intraspecific variation in body size, and the mechanisms causing this variation, have been poorly described in social wasps. This study examined ecogeographical patterns of body size for 12 native species and one non-native species of North American paper wasps (genus: Polistes) using body size measurements from > 14,000 pinned museum specimens. Intraspecific body size was correlated with latitude, elevation, and broadscale climate variation. However, the direction of this relationship was idiosyncratic across species, with Bergmann's clines and converse Bergmann's clines equally represented. There was no evidence of a phylogenetic signal in the direction of the cline between body size and the environment. Within species, the worker caste and the reproductive caste showed the same direction of response between body size and latitude, although for most species the reproductive caste was larger than the worker caste. Intraspecific variation in body size appears to be driven by differences in the response among species to similar environmental variables but the mechanisms causing this variation remain unknown.
引用
收藏
页码:109 / 122
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Increases in intraspecific body size variation are common among North American mammals and birds between 1880 and 2020
    Shilu Zheng
    Juntao Hu
    Zhijun Ma
    David Lindenmayer
    Jiajia Liu
    Nature Ecology & Evolution, 2023, 7 : 347 - 354
  • [32] CONTRASTING PATTERNS OF BODY SIZE FOR DAPHNIA SPECIES THAT SEGREGATE BY HABITAT
    LEIBOLD, M
    TESSIER, AJ
    OECOLOGIA, 1991, 86 (03) : 342 - 348
  • [33] BODY SIZE AND PALEOBIOLOGY OF EARLY TERTIARY NORTH-AMERICAN PRIMATES
    GUNNELL, GF
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL ANTHROPOLOGY, 1983, 60 (02) : 202 - 202
  • [34] Spatial Dynamics of Body Size Frequency Distributions for North American Squamates
    Cox, Christian L.
    Boback, Scott M.
    Guyer, Craig
    EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY, 2011, 38 (04) : 453 - 464
  • [35] Spatial Dynamics of Body Size Frequency Distributions for North American Squamates
    Christian L. Cox
    Scott M. Boback
    Craig Guyer
    Evolutionary Biology, 2011, 38 : 453 - 464
  • [36] GENOME SIZE VARIATION IN NORTH-AMERICAN MINNOWS (CYPRINIDAE) .2. VARIATION AMONG 20 SPECIES
    GOLD, JR
    AMEMIYA, CT
    GENOME, 1987, 29 (03) : 481 - 489
  • [37] Brain structure differences between solitary and social wasp species are independent of body size allometry
    O'Donnell, Sean
    Bulova, Susan
    DeLeon, Sara
    Barrett, Meghan
    Fiocca, Katherine
    JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE PHYSIOLOGY A-NEUROETHOLOGY SENSORY NEURAL AND BEHAVIORAL PHYSIOLOGY, 2019, 205 (06): : 911 - 916
  • [38] Brain structure differences between solitary and social wasp species are independent of body size allometry
    Sean O’Donnell
    Susan Bulova
    Sara DeLeon
    Meghan Barrett
    Katherine Fiocca
    Journal of Comparative Physiology A, 2019, 205 : 911 - 916
  • [39] Phylogenetic relationships among North American Alosa species (Clupeidae)
    Bowen, B. R.
    Kreiser, B. R.
    Mickle, P. F.
    Schaefer, J. F.
    Adams, S. B.
    JOURNAL OF FISH BIOLOGY, 2008, 72 (05) : 1188 - 1201
  • [40] Latitudinal variation in testis size in six species of North American songbirds
    Pitcher, TE
    Stutchbury, BJM
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ZOOLOGY-REVUE CANADIENNE DE ZOOLOGIE, 1998, 76 (04): : 618 - 622