The role and limits of analogical argument: A reply to Aronovitch

被引：2

|

作者：

Lessnoff, M

机构：

来源：

POLITICAL STUDIES | 1997年 / 45卷 / 01期

关键词：

D O I：

10.1111/1467-9248.00072

中图分类号：

D0 [政治学、政治理论];

学科分类号：

0302 ; 030201 ;

摘要：

引用

收藏

页码：93 / 96

页数：4

相关论文

共 50 条

[41] How to think about analogical inferences: A reply to Norton
Genta, Benjamin S.
[J]. STUDIES IN HISTORY AND PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE, 2020, 82 : 17 - 24
[42] The role of goal knowledge in analogical mapping
Cayol, S
[J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2000, 35 (3-4) : 376 - 376
[43] ON THE LIMITS OF THE LIMITS OF ADVOCACY RESEARCH - REPLY
GERBNER, G
GROSS, L
MORGAN, M
SIGNORIELLI, N
[J]. PUBLIC OPINION QUARTERLY, 1981, 45 (01) : 116 - 118
[44] The limits of the just-too-different argument
Francen, Ragnar
Moberger, Victor
[J]. RATIO, 2024, 37 (01) : 64 - 75
[45] THE LOGIC AND LIMITS OF THE FREE WILL ARGUMENT: AN ESCHATOLOGICAL RECONSIDERATION
Lundberg, Matthew D.
[J]. MODERN THEOLOGY, 2016, 32 (02) : 170 - 186
[46] THE ONTOLOGICAL ARGUMENT DEFENDED + A REPLY TO OBJECTIONS
MAKIN, S
[J]. PHILOSOPHY, 1992, 67 (260) : 247 - 255
[47] An improved reply to the argument from categorization
Earl, Dennis
[J]. JOURNAL OF MIND AND BEHAVIOR, 2007, 28 (3-4): : 279 - 288
[48] DISTRIBUTION V PRODUCTION ARGUMENT - REPLY
WONG, J
[J]. FOOD POLICY, 1981, 6 (02) : 130 - 130
[49] Reply to Huemer on the consequence argument - Discussion
Beebee, H
[J]. PHILOSOPHICAL REVIEW, 2003, 111 (02): : 235 - 241
[50] The Coase mechanism and the iteration argument: Reply
Schlicht, E
[J]. KYKLOS, 1997, 50 (04) : 581 - 585

← 1 2 3 4 5 →