A comparison of different Gabor feature extraction approaches for mass classification in mammography

被引:40
|
作者
Khan, Salabat [1 ]
Hussain, Muhammad [2 ]
Aboalsamh, Hatim [2 ]
Bebis, George [3 ]
机构
[1] Comsats Inst Informat Technol, Dept Comp Sci, Attock, Pakistan
[2] King Saud Univ, Coll Comp & Informat Sci, Dept Comp Sci, Riyadh 11543, Saudi Arabia
[3] Univ Nevada, Dept Comp Sci & Engn, Reno, NV 89557 USA
关键词
Mass detection; Gabor filter bank; Directional features; Digital mammography; Feature transformation and reduction; SEL weighted SVM; PCA; LDA; FALSE-POSITIVE REDUCTION; STATISTICAL COMPARISONS; TEXTURE FEATURES; BREAST-TISSUE; MICROCALCIFICATIONS; SEGMENTATION; CLASSIFIERS;
D O I
10.1007/s11042-015-3017-3
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
We investigate the performance of six different approaches for directional feature extraction for mass classification problem in digital mammograms. These techniques use a bank of Gabor filters to extract the directional textural features. Directional textural features represent structural properties of masses and normal tissues in mammograms at different orientations and frequencies. Masses and micro-calcifications are two early signs of breast cancer which is a major leading cause of death in women. For the detection of masses, segmentation of mammograms results in regions of interest (ROIs) which not only include masses but suspicious normal tissues as well (which lead to false positives during the discrimination process). The problem is to reduce the false positives by classifying ROIs as masses and normal tissues. In addition, the detected masses are required to be further classified as malignant and benign. The feature extraction approaches are evaluated over the ROIs extracted from MIAS database. Successive Enhancement Learning based weighted Support Vector Machine (SELwSVM) is used to efficiently classify the generated unbalanced datasets. The average accuracy ranges from 68 to 100 % as obtained by different methods used in our paper. Comparisons are carried out based on statistical analysis to make further recommendations.
引用
收藏
页码:33 / 57
页数:25
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Gabor Feature Extraction of Mixed Fingerprint Template
    Sojan, Shancymol
    Kulkarni, R. K.
    2017 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ELECTRICAL, INSTRUMENTATION AND COMMUNICATION ENGINEERING (ICEICE), 2017,
  • [32] Iris Feature Extraction Using Gabor Filter
    Minhas, Saadia
    Javed, Muhammad Younus
    ICET: 2009 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES, PROCEEDINGS, 2009, : 252 - 255
  • [33] Fingerprint feature extraction using Gabor filters
    Lee, CJ
    Wang, SD
    ELECTRONICS LETTERS, 1999, 35 (04) : 288 - 290
  • [34] Simplified Gabor wavelets for efficient feature extraction
    Choi, Wing-Pong
    Tse, Siu-Hong
    Wong, Kwok-Wai
    Lam, Kin-Man
    TENCON 2007 - 2007 IEEE REGION 10 CONFERENCE, VOLS 1-3, 2007, : 861 - 864
  • [35] Automatic breast tumor classification using a level set method and feature extraction in mammography
    Pashoutan, Soheil
    Shokouhi, Shahriar Baradaran
    Pashoutan, Meisam
    2017 24TH NATIONAL AND 2ND INTERNATIONAL IRANIAN CONFERENCE ON BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING (ICBME), 2017, : 240 - 245
  • [36] A COMPARISON OF FEATURE EXTRACTION METHODS FOR SENTINEL-1 IMAGES: GABOR AND WEBER TRANSFORMS
    Stan, Mihaela
    Popescu, Anca
    Stoichescu, Dan Alexandru
    SAR IMAGE ANALYSIS, MODELING, AND TECHNIQUES XV, 2015, 9642
  • [38] Comparison of different approaches to analytical images classification
    Stubbings, TC
    Wolkenstein, MG
    Hutter, H
    JOURNAL OF TRACE AND MICROPROBE TECHNIQUES, 1999, 17 (01): : 1 - 16
  • [39] Feature extraction from mass spectra for classification of pathological states
    Kalousis, A
    Prados, J
    Rexhepaj, E
    Hilario, M
    KNOWLEDGE DISCOVERY IN DATABASES: PKDD 2005, 2005, 3721 : 536 - 543
  • [40] Three-dimensional Gabor feature extraction for hyperspectral imagery classification using a memetic framework
    Zhu, Zexuan
    Jia, Sen
    He, Shan
    Sun, Yiwen
    Ji, Zhen
    Shen, Linlin
    INFORMATION SCIENCES, 2015, 298 : 274 - 287