Cost-utility model of brivaracetam in the adjunctive treatment of patients with epilepsy in Spain

被引:2
|
作者
Barrachina-Martinez, Isabel [1 ]
Vivas-Consuelo, David [1 ]
Reyes-Santias, Francisco [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Politecn Valencia, INECO, Valencia, Spain
[2] Univ Vigo, Fac Ciencias Empresarias & Turismo, Dept Org Empresas & Mkt, Orense 32004, Spain
关键词
Cost utility; anti-epileptic drugs; adjunctive therapy; markov model; monte Carlo simulation; REFRACTORY EPILEPSY; RETIGABINE; TRIALS; ADULTS; HEALTH; LIFE;
D O I
10.1080/14737167.2021.1838899
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective This study aims to assess the cost utility of Brivaracetam compared with the third-generation anti-epileptic drugs used as standard care. Methods A cost utility analysis of Brivaracetam was carried out with other third-generation comparators. The treatment pathway of a hypothetical cohort over a period of 2 years was simulated using the Markov model. Data for effectiveness and the QALYs of each health status for epilepsy, as well as for the disutilities of adverse events of treatments, were analyzed through a studies review. The cost of the anti-epileptics and the use of medical resources linked to the different health statuses were taken into consideration. A probabilistic sensitivity analysis was performed using a Monte Carlo simulation. Results Brivaracetam was shown to be the dominant alternative, with Incremental Cost Utility Ratio (ICUR) values from -11,318 for Lacosamide to -128,482 for Zonisamide. The probabilistic sensitivity analysis validates these results. The ICUR sensitivity is greater for increases in the price of Brivaracetam than for decreases, and for Eslicarbizapine over the other adjunctives considered in the analysis. Conclusions Treatment with Brivaracetam resulted in cost effective and incremental quality adjusted life years come at an acceptable cost.
引用
收藏
页码:1081 / 1090
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Cost-utility analysis of an implant treatment in dentistry
    Losenicka, Johana
    Gajdos, Ondrej
    Kamensky, Vojtech
    BMC ORAL HEALTH, 2021, 21 (01)
  • [42] The cost-utility of sodium oxybate as narcolepsy treatment
    Bolin, K.
    Berling, P.
    Wasling, P.
    Meinild, H.
    Kjellberg, J.
    Jennum, P.
    ACTA NEUROLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2017, 136 (06): : 715 - 720
  • [43] The treatment of insomnia in the elderly: A cost-utility analysis
    Bell, L
    Tousignant, P
    MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 1998, 18 (04) : 487 - 487
  • [44] Cost-utility analysis of an implant treatment in dentistry
    Johana Losenická
    Ondřej Gajdoš
    Vojtěch Kamenský
    BMC Oral Health, 21
  • [45] Efficacy and tolerability of brivaracetam as adjunctive treatment for adults with refractory partial-onset epilepsy
    van Paesschen, W.
    von Rosenstiel, P.
    EPILEPSIA, 2007, 48 : 56 - 57
  • [46] Cost-utility analysis of rimonabant in the treatment of obesity
    Hampp, Christian
    Hartzema, Abraham G.
    Kauf, Teresa L.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2008, 11 (03) : 389 - 399
  • [47] ASSESSING THE COST-UTILITY OF ETELCALCETIDE: A MARKOV MODEL
    Stollenwerk, B.
    Iannazzo, S.
    Akehurst, R.
    Adena, M.
    Briggs, A.
    Dehmel, B.
    Parfrey, P.
    Belozeroff, V
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2016, 19 (07) : A519 - A519
  • [48] A COST-UTILITY MODEL FOR RENAL TRANSPLANTS IN COLOMBIA
    Rosselli, D.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2009, 12 (07) : A484 - A484
  • [49] COST-UTILITY ANALYSIS OF INGENOL MEBUTATE VERSUS IMIQUIMOD 5% FOR ACTINIC KERATOSIS TREATMENT IN SPAIN
    Ortega-Joaquin, N.
    Elias, I
    de la Cueva, P.
    Del Pozo, L. J.
    Boada, A.
    Moreno, D.
    Aguilar, M.
    Mosquera, E.
    Mirada, A.
    Gibbons, C.
    Oyaguez, I
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2015, 18 (07) : A423 - A423
  • [50] COST-UTILITY ANALYSIS OF INGENOL MEBUTATE VERSUS DICLOFENAC 3% FOR ACTINIC KERATOSIS TREATMENT IN SPAIN
    Elias, I
    Ortega-Joaquin, N.
    Aguilar, M.
    Moreno, D.
    Boada, A.
    Del Pozo, L. J.
    de la Cueva, P.
    Mirada, A.
    Mosquera, E.
    Gibbons, C.
    Oyaguez, I
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2015, 18 (07) : A423 - A424