共 50 条
Advanced Imaging Technologies Increase Detection of Dysplasia and Neoplasia in Patients With Barrett's Esophagus: A Meta-analysis and Systematic Review
被引:159
|作者:
Qumseya, Bashar J.
[1
]
Wang, Haibo
[2
]
Badie, Nicole
[3
]
Uzomba, Rosemary N.
[4
]
Parasa, Sravanthi
[5
,6
]
White, Donna L.
[7
,8
,9
]
Wolfsen, Herbert
[1
]
Sharma, Prateek
[5
,6
]
Wallace, Michael B.
[1
]
机构:
[1] Mayo Clin, Div Gastroenterol & Hepatol, Jacksonville, FL 32224 USA
[2] Univ Hong Kong, Dept Surg, Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[3] Joseph M Smith Community Hlth Ctr, Dept Pediat, Allston, MA USA
[4] Brigham & Womens Hosp, Dept Perioperat Med & Pain Management, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[5] Vet Affairs Med Ctr, Div Gastroenterol & Hepatol, Kansas City, MO USA
[6] Univ Kansas, Med Ctr, Kansas City, MO USA
[7] Baylor Coll Med, Sect Hlth Serv Res, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[8] Baylor Coll Med, Sect Gastroenterol & Hepatol, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[9] Michael E DeBakey VA, Houston, TX USA
关键词:
Barrett's Esophagus;
PRISMA;
QUADAS;
Advanced Imaging;
Risk Difference;
Esophageal Adenocarcinoma;
HIGH-GRADE DYSPLASIA;
BLUE-DIRECTED BIOPSIES;
SPECIALIZED INTESTINAL METAPLASIA;
HIGH-RESOLUTION ENDOSCOPY;
METHYLENE-BLUE;
EARLY ADENOCARCINOMA;
STANDARD ENDOSCOPY;
4-QUADRANT BIOPSY;
EARLY CANCER;
ACETIC-ACID;
D O I:
10.1016/j.cgh.2013.06.017
中图分类号:
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号:
摘要:
BACKGROUND & AIMS: US guidelines recommend surveillance of patients with Barrett's esophagus (BE) to detect dysplasia. BE conventionally is monitored via white-light endoscopy (WLE) and a collection of random biopsy specimens. However, this approach does not definitively or consistently detect areas of dysplasia. Advanced imaging technologies can increase the detection of dysplasia and cancer. We investigated whether these imaging technologies can increase the diagnostic yield for the detection of neoplasia in patients with BE, compared with WLE and analysis of random biopsy specimens. METHODS: We performed a systematic review, using Medline and Embase, to identify relevant peer-review studies. Fourteen studies were included in the final analysis, with a total of 843 patients. Our metameter (estimate) of interest was the paired-risk difference (RD), defined as the difference in yield of the detection of dysplasia or cancer using advanced imaging vs WLE. The estimated paired-RD and 95% confidence interval (CI) were obtained using random-effects models. Heterogeneity was assessed by means of the Q statistic and the I-2 statistic. An exploratory meta-regression was performed to look for associations between the metameter and potential confounders or modifiers. RESULTS: Overall, advanced imaging techniques increased the diagnostic yield for detection of dysplasia or cancer by 34% (95% CI, 20%-56%; P < .0001). A subgroup analysis showed that virtual chromoendoscopy significantly increased the diagnostic yield (RD, 0.34; 95% CI, 0.14-0.56; P < .0001). The RD for chromoendoscopy was 0.35 (95% CI, 0.13-0.56; P = .0001). There was no significant difference between virtual chromoendoscopy and chromoendoscopy, based on Student t test analysis (P = .45). CONCLUSIONS: Based on a meta-analysis, advanced imaging techniques such as chromoendoscopy or virtual chromoendoscopy significantly increase the diagnostic yield for identification of dysplasia or cancer in patients with BE.
引用
收藏
页码:1562 / U221
页数:11
相关论文