Comparison of native myocardial T1 and T2 mapping at 1.5T and 3T in healthy volunteers Reference values and clinical implications

被引:57
|
作者
Granitz, Marcel [1 ]
Motloch, Lukas J. [2 ]
Granitz, Christina [2 ]
Meissnitzer, Matthias [1 ]
Hitzl, Wolfgang [3 ]
Hergan, Klaus [1 ]
Schlattau, Alexander [1 ]
机构
[1] Paracelsus Med Univ, Dept Radiol, Mullner Hauptstr 48, A-5020 Salzburg, Austria
[2] Paracelsus Med Univ, Dept Internal Med 2, Salzburg, Austria
[3] Paracelsus Med Univ, Res Off Biostat, Salzburg, Austria
关键词
Cardiac; MRI; Normal; Field strength; CARDIOVASCULAR MAGNETIC-RESONANCE; T-1; AGE; VALIDATION; FIBROSIS; DISEASE;
D O I
10.1007/s00508-018-1411-3
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background Myocardial native T1 and T2 mapping are promising techniques for quantitative assessment of diffuse myocardial pathologies; however, due to conflicting data regarding normal values, routine clinical implementation of this method is still challenging. Methods To evaluate this situation during daily clinical practice the characteristics of normal values obtained in 60 healthy volunteers who underwent magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans on 1.5T and 3T scanners were studied. The T1 modified look-locker inversion recovery (MOLLI; 5(3)3; modified for higher heart rates) and T2 navigator gated black-blood prepared gradient-spin-echo (GraSE) sequences were used. Results While age and body mass index did not affect relaxation times, a gender and heart rate dependency was found showing higher T1 and T2 values in females, whereas at higher heart rates a prolongation of T1 and a shortening of T2 relaxation times was found. Particularly prone to artifacts were T2 measurements at 3T and the inferolateral wall. In the individual setting mean relaxation times for T1 were 995.8 +/- 30.9 ms at 1.5T and 1183.8 +/- 37.5 ms at 3T and 55.8 +/- 2.8 ms at 1.5T and 51.6 +/- 3 ms at 3T for T2 indicating a high dependency of reference values on MRI protocol when compared to the literature. Furthermore, as presumed mean T1 and T2 values correlated in the same individual. Conclusions The T1 and T2 relaxation times depend on physiological factors and especially on MRI protocols. Therefore, reference values should be validated individually in every radiological institution before implementing mapping protocols in daily clinical practice. Correlation of mean T1 and T2 values in the same proband at both field strengths indicates intraindividual reproducibility.
引用
收藏
页码:143 / 155
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparison of native myocardial T1 and T2 mapping at 1.5T and 3T in healthy volunteersReference values and clinical implications
    Marcel Granitz
    Lukas J. Motloch
    Christina Granitz
    Matthias Meissnitzer
    Wolfgang Hitzl
    Klaus Hergan
    Alexander Schlattau
    Wiener klinische Wochenschrift, 2019, 131 : 143 - 155
  • [2] COMPARISON OF NATIVE MYOCARDIAL T1 AND T2 MAPPING AT 1.5T AND 3T IN HEALTHY VOLUNTEERS FOLLOWING INSTALLATION OF NEW SCANNERS
    Tsoumani, Zoi
    Nakou, Eleni
    Alpendurada, Francisco
    Pennell, Dudley J.
    Lota, Amrit
    HEART, 2023, 109 (SUPPL_1) : A17 - A18
  • [3] Age-gender reference values of native myocardial T1 at 1.5T and 3T: comparison of MOLLI and shMOLLI
    Darius Dabir
    Toby Rogers
    Tobias Voigt
    Tobias Schaeffter
    Eike Nagel
    Valentina O Puntmann
    Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, 15 (Suppl 1)
  • [4] Reference values for regional and global myocardial T2 mapping with cardiovascular magnetic resonance at 1.5T and 3T
    Alicia M Maceira
    Jose Vicente Monmeneu
    Begoña Igual-Muñoz
    Pilar M Lopez-Lereu
    Pilar M Garcia
    Juan Cosin
    Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, 17 (Suppl 1)
  • [5] T1 at 1.5T and 3T compared with conventional T2*at 1.5T for cardiac siderosis
    Alam, Mohammed H.
    Auger, Dominique
    Smith, Gillian C.
    He, Taigang
    Vassiliou, Vassilis
    Baksi, A. John
    Wage, Rick
    Drivas, Peter
    Feng, Yanqiu
    Firmin, David N.
    Pennell, Dudley J.
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE, 2015, 17
  • [6] T1 at 1.5T and 3T compared with conventional T2* at 1.5T for cardiac siderosis
    Mohammed H. Alam
    Dominique Auger
    Gillian C. Smith
    Taigang He
    Vassilis Vassiliou
    A. John Baksi
    Rick Wage
    Peter Drivas
    Yanqiu Feng
    David N. Firmin
    Dudley J. Pennell
    Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, 17
  • [7] Myocardial T1 and T2 mapping at 3 T: reference values, influencing factors and implications
    von Knobelsdorff-Brenkenhoff, Florian
    Prothmann, Marcel
    Dieringer, Matthias A.
    Wassmuth, Ralf
    Greiser, Andreas
    Schwenke, Carsten
    Niendorf, Thoralf
    Schulz-Menger, Jeanette
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE, 2013, 15
  • [8] Myocardial T1 and T2 mapping at 3 T: reference values, influencing factors and implications
    Florian von Knobelsdorff-Brenkenhoff
    Marcel Prothmann
    Matthias A Dieringer
    Ralf Wassmuth
    Andreas Greiser
    Carsten Schwenke
    Thoralf Niendorf
    Jeanette Schulz-Menger
    Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, 15
  • [9] Myocardial T1 responds to adenosine - normal values of stress T1 reactivity at 1.5T and 3T
    Alexander Liu
    Rohan S Wijesurendra
    Jane M Francis
    Matthew D Robson
    Stefan Neubauer
    Stefan K Piechnik
    Vanessa M Ferreira
    Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, 17 (Suppl 1)
  • [10] Reference values of myocardial native T1 and T2 mapping values in normal Indian population at 1.5 Tesla scanner
    Shaw, Manish
    Ojha, Vineeta
    Ganga, Kartik P.
    Malhi, Amarindar Singh
    Chandrashekhara, S. H.
    Kumar, Sanjeev
    Khan, Maroof Ahmad
    Jagia, Priya
    Sharma, Sanjiv
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR IMAGING, 2022, 38 (11): : 2403 - 2411