Novel forecasting approaches using combination of machine learning and statistical models for flood susceptibility mapping

被引:255
|
作者
Shafizadeh-Moghadam, Hossein [1 ]
Valavi, Roozbeh [2 ]
Shahabi, Himan [3 ]
Chapi, Kamran [4 ]
Shirzadi, Ataollah [4 ]
机构
[1] Tarbiat Modares Univ, Dept GIS & Remote Sensing, Tehran, Iran
[2] Univ Melbourne, Sch BioSci, Parkville, Vic 3010, Australia
[3] Univ Kurdistan, Fac Nat Resources, Dept Geomorphol, Sanandaj, Iran
[4] Univ Kurdistan, Fac Nat Resources, Dept Rangeland & Watershed Management, Sanandaj, Iran
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Flood susceptibility mapping; Haraz watershed; Ensemble forecasting; Machine learning; Background sampling; ADAPTIVE REGRESSION SPLINES; WEIGHTS-OF-EVIDENCE; SPATIAL PREDICTION; FREQUENCY RATIO; RIVER-BASIN; ENSEMBLE; GIS; AREA; BIVARIATE; SCALE;
D O I
10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.03.089
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
In this research, eight individual machine learning and statistical models are implemented and compared, and based on their results, seven ensemble models for flood susceptibility assessment are introduced. The individual models included artificial neural networks, classification and regression trees, flexible discriminant analysis, generalized linear model, generalized additive model, boosted regression trees, multivariate adaptive regression splines, and maximum entropy, and the ensemble models were Ensemble Model committee averaging (EMca), Ensemble Model confidence interval Inferior (EMcilnf), Ensemble Model confidence interval Superior (EMciSup), Ensemble Model to estimate the coefficient of variation (EMcv), Ensemble Model to estimate the mean (EMmean), Ensemble Model to estimate the median (EMmedian), and Ensemble Model based on weighted mean (EMwmean). The data set covered 201 flood events in the Haraz watershed (Mazandaran province in Iran) and 10,000 randomly selected non-occurrence points. Among the individual models, the Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic (AUROC), which showed the highest value, belonged to boosted regression trees (0.975) and the lowest value was recorded for generalized linear model (0.642). On the other hand, the proposed EMmedian resulted in the highest accuracy (0.976) among all models. In spite of the outstanding performance of some models, nevertheless, variability among the prediction of individual models was considerable. Therefore, to reduce uncertainty, creating more generalizable, more stable, and less sensitive models, ensemble forecasting approaches and in particular the EMmedian is recommended for flood susceptibility assessment. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 11
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Examination of the efficacy of machine learning approaches in the generation of flood susceptibility maps
    Wahba, Mohamed
    Sharaan, Mahmoud
    Elsadek, Wael M.
    Kanae, Shinjiro
    Hassan, H. Shokry
    ENVIRONMENTAL EARTH SCIENCES, 2024, 83 (14)
  • [42] Accessing the Impact of Meteorological Variables on Machine Learning Flood Susceptibility Mapping
    McGrath, Heather
    Gohl, Piper Nora
    REMOTE SENSING, 2022, 14 (07)
  • [43] Integration of hard and soft supervised machine learning for flood susceptibility mapping
    Andaryani, Soghra
    Nourani, Vahid
    Haghighi, Ali Torabi
    Keesstra, Saskia
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2021, 291
  • [44] Flood susceptibility modeling of the Karnali river basin of Nepal using different machine learning approaches
    Duwal, Sunil
    Liu, Dedi
    Pradhan, Prachand Man
    GEOMATICS NATURAL HAZARDS & RISK, 2023, 14 (01)
  • [45] A comparative evaluation of statistical and machine learning approaches for debris flow susceptibility zonation mapping in the Indian Himalayas
    Dash, Rajesh Kumar
    Gupta, Neha
    Falae, Philips Omowumi
    Pati, Rajashree
    Kanungo, Debi Prasanna
    ENVIRONMENT DEVELOPMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY, 2024,
  • [46] Flood, landslides, forest fire, and earthquake susceptibility maps using machine learning techniques and their combination
    Hamid Reza Pourghasemi
    Soheila Pouyan
    Mojgan Bordbar
    Foroogh Golkar
    John J. Clague
    Natural Hazards, 2023, 116 : 3797 - 3816
  • [47] Flood, landslides, forest fire, and earthquake susceptibility maps using machine learning techniques and their combination
    Pourghasemi, Hamid Reza
    Pouyan, Soheila
    Bordbar, Mojgan
    Golkar, Foroogh
    Clague, John J.
    NATURAL HAZARDS, 2023, 116 (03) : 3797 - 3816
  • [48] Landslide susceptibility zonation using statistical and machine learning approaches in Northern Lecco, Italy
    Mehrabi, Mohammad
    NATURAL HAZARDS, 2022, 111 (01) : 901 - 937
  • [49] Flash flood susceptibility mapping based on catchments using an improved Blending machine learning approach
    Yin, Yongqiang
    Zhang, Xiaoxiang
    Guan, Zheng
    Chen, Yuehong
    Liu, Changjun
    Yang, Tao
    HYDROLOGY RESEARCH, 2023, 54 (04): : 557 - 579
  • [50] Landslide susceptibility zonation using statistical and machine learning approaches in Northern Lecco, Italy
    Mohammad Mehrabi
    Natural Hazards, 2022, 111 : 901 - 937