Sample Size Determination in Group-Sequential Trials Assessing Interim Futility by Intermediate Composite Endpoints

被引:0
|
作者
Nomura, Shogo [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tokyo, Grad Sch Med, Dept Biostat & Bioinformat, Bunkyo Ku, 7-3-1 Hongo, Tokyo 1130033, Japan
来源
关键词
Group-sequential design; Multiple endpoints; Sample size; Survival analysis; PROGRESSION-FREE SURVIVAL; SIZING CLINICAL-TRIALS; TIME; ONCOLOGY;
D O I
10.1080/19466315.2020.1799852
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
In oncology trials, noninferiority concepts (e.g., shortening duration of chemotherapy) have sometimes been evaluated without preliminary knowledge of an experimental treatment being noninferior to the standard treatment, and thus, a prompt consideration for futility stop is vital. Because such concepts are usually examined in a patient population with a good prognosis, it is often the case that the number of events is quite small at earlier interim analyses. In the present study, we numerically assess the power reduction of when an aggressive inefficacy monitoring based on an earlier-available intermediate endpoint is used. We then propose a sample size determination method, and investigate the performance. An actual phase 3 oncology trial is used as a motivating example.
引用
收藏
页码:492 / 503
页数:12
相关论文
共 46 条
  • [11] Modification of sample size in group sequential clinical trials
    Cui, L
    Hung, HMJ
    Wang, SJ
    [J]. BIOMETRICS, 1999, 55 (03) : 853 - 857
  • [12] A comparison of the cost-efficiencies of the sequential, group-sequential, and variable-sample-size-sequential probability ratio tests
    Morgan, PB
    Cressie, N
    [J]. SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF STATISTICS, 1997, 24 (02) : 181 - 200
  • [13] Blinded sample size recalculation in clinical trials with binary composite endpoints
    Sander, Anja
    Rauch, Geraldine
    Kieser, Meinhard
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BIOPHARMACEUTICAL STATISTICS, 2017, 27 (04) : 705 - 715
  • [14] A review and re-interpretation of a group-sequential approach to sample size re-estimation in two-stage trials
    Bowden, J.
    Mander, A.
    [J]. PHARMACEUTICAL STATISTICS, 2014, 13 (03) : 163 - 172
  • [15] SAMPLE-SIZE DETERMINATION FOR GROUP SEQUENTIAL CLINICAL-TRIALS WITH IMMEDIATE RESPONSE
    KIM, KM
    DEMETS, DL
    [J]. STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 1992, 11 (10) : 1391 - 1399
  • [16] Sample size calculation for planning group sequential longitudinal trials
    Liu, AY
    Boyett, JM
    Xiong, XP
    [J]. STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2000, 19 (02) : 221 - 237
  • [17] Evaluating group-sequential non-inferiority clinical trials following interim stopping: The HIV Prevention Trials Network 083 trial
    Hanscom, Brett S.
    Donnell, Deborah J.
    Fleming, Thomas R.
    Hughes, James P.
    McCauley, Marybeth
    Grinsztejn, Beatriz
    Landovitz, Raphael J.
    Emerson, Scott S.
    [J]. CLINICAL TRIALS, 2022, 19 (06) : 605 - 612
  • [18] Methods to minimize power loss at interim futility analyses and final analyses due to violations annual sample size assumptions in oncology clinical trials with survival endpoints.
    Camp, Aaron C.
    Adair, Joseph Walt
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2014, 32 (15)
  • [19] Sample size determination in clinical trials with multiple co-primary binary endpoints
    Sozu, Takashi
    Sugimoto, Tomoyuki
    Hamasaki, Toshimitsu
    [J]. STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2010, 29 (21) : 2169 - 2179
  • [20] Adaptive group-sequential design with population enrichment in phase 3 randomized controlled trials with two binary co-primary endpoints
    Sinha, Arup K.
    Moye, Lemuel, III
    Piller, Linda B.
    Yamal, Jose-Miguel
    Barcenas, Carlos H.
    Lin, Jianchang
    Davis, Barry R.
    [J]. STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2019, 38 (21) : 3985 - 3996