Surgical Outcomes After Apical Repair for Vault Compared With Uterovaginal Prolapse

被引:7
|
作者
Rogers, Rebecca G. [1 ]
Nolen, Tracy L.
Weidner, Alison C.
Richter, Holly E.
Jelovsek, J. Eric
Shepherd, Jonathan P.
Harvie, Heidi S.
Brubaker, Linda
Menefee, Shawn A.
Myers, Deborah
Hsu, Yvonne
Schaffer, Joseph I.
Wallace, Dennis
Meikle, Susan F.
机构
[1] Univ Texas Austin, Dell Med Sch, Dept Womens Hlth, 1301 W 38th St,Suite 705, Austin, TX 78705 USA
来源
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY | 2018年 / 131卷 / 03期
关键词
PELVIC ORGAN PROLAPSE; VAGINAL PROLAPSE; INCONTINENCE;
D O I
10.1097/AOG.0000000000002492
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE: To retrospectively compare surgical success and complications between vaginal vault prolapse compared with uterovaginal prolapse in women who underwent apical prolapse repair for stage II-IV prolapse. METHODS: Women in one of three Pelvic Floor Disorders Network prolapse surgical trials were included. Absence of bothersome bulge symptoms, no prolapse beyond the hymen, and no subsequent prolapse treatment defined success and was our primary outcome. Secondary outcomes included comparison of quality-oflife measures, anatomic changes, and adverse events. Pelvic organ prolapse quantification (POP-Q) and quality-of-life measures were administered at baseline and 1-2 years postoperatively. Comparisons were controlled for study site, age, body mass index, baseline POP-Q, apical and anterior or posterior repair performed, and prior prolapse repair. Outcomes measured at multiple time points were analyzed using longitudinal models to assess whether differences existed across study follow-up. RESULTS: Four hundred twenty-one women underwent vault prolapse, and 601 underwent uterovaginal prolapse apical repair. The vault prolapse group was older, more likely to be white, and to have prior urinary incontinence or prolapse repair, stage IV prolapse, and more prolapse bother on a validated scale (all P <= 34). The vault prolapse group was more likely to undergo sacrocolpopexy (228/421 [54%] vs 93/601 [15%]); the uterovaginal prolapse group was more likely to undergo vaginal repair (508/601 [85%] vs 193/421 [46%] P<.001). There were no differences in success (odds ratio [OR] 0.76 for vault prolapse vs uterovaginal prolapse, 95% CI 0.51-1.15, P5.20), changes in Pelvic Organ Prolapse Distress Inventory scores (279.4 vs 279.8, P=.89), postoperative POPQ point C measurements (27.0 vs 27.1 cm, P=.41), or serious adverse events (86/421 [20%] vs 90/601 [15%], P=.86) between groups. Among women who underwent a vaginal approach for repair of vault prolapse (n=193) or uterovaginal prolapse (n=508), there were no differences in success rates (OR 0.67, 95% CI 0.43-1.04, P=.09) at 1-2 years postoperatively. CONCLUSION: Surgical success of stage II-IV vault prolapse and uterovaginal prolapse apical repair was similar whether performed vaginally or abdominally at 1-2 years postoperatively.
引用
收藏
页码:475 / 483
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Apical vault repair, the cornerstone or pelvic vault reconstruction
    Ross J.W.
    International Urogynecology Journal, 1997, 8 (3) : 146 - 152
  • [32] Variation in the Quality of Surgical Care for Uterovaginal Prolapse
    Rhoads, Kim F.
    Sokol, Eric R.
    MEDICAL CARE, 2011, 49 (01) : 46 - 51
  • [33] UTEROVAGINAL PROLAPSE: TRADITIONAL RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY OUTCOMES
    Espaillat-Rijo, Luis
    Hegde, Aparna
    Jawed, Asra
    Davila, G. Willy
    NEUROUROLOGY AND URODYNAMICS, 2014, 33 (02) : 173 - 174
  • [34] Surgical Treatment of Vaginal Vault Prolapse: A Historic Summary and Review of Outcomes
    Klauschie, Jennifer L.
    Cornella, Jeffrey L.
    FEMALE PELVIC MEDICINE AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2012, 18 (01): : 10 - 17
  • [35] Laparoscopic repair of vaginal vault prolapse
    Wattiez, A
    Mashiach, R
    Donoso, M
    CURRENT OPINION IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2003, 15 (04) : 315 - 319
  • [36] Transvaginal repair of vault prolapse: A review
    Sze, EHM
    Karram, MM
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1997, 89 (03): : 466 - 475
  • [37] Vaginal vault prolapse: Evaluation and repair
    David A. Ginsberg
    Current Urology Reports, 2003, 4 (5) : 404 - 408
  • [38] INITIAL OUTCOMES OF ELEVATE ANTERIOR® APICAL SYSTEM FOR REPAIR OF ANTERIOR AND APICAL VAGINAL PROLAPSE
    Grigoriev, Victor
    Abramowitz, David
    Candela, Joseph
    NEUROUROLOGY AND URODYNAMICS, 2011, 30 (02) : 272 - 272
  • [39] Surgical Correction of Anterior and Apical Prolapse with Mesh: Indications and Outcomes
    Popov, A.
    Enikeev, M.
    Klyushnikov
    Fedorov, A.
    Tyurina, S.
    Efremova, E.
    Seldzhan, G.
    INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL, 2023, 34 : S53 - S54
  • [40] Design of a 3-Arm Randomized Trial for Posthysterectomy Vault Prolapse Involving Sacral Colpopexy, Transvaginal Mesh, and Native Tissue Apical Repair: The Apical Suspension Repair for Vault Prolapse in a Three-Arm Randomized Trial
    Menefee, Shawn
    Richter, Holly E.
    Myers, Deborah
    Weidner, Alison
    Moalli, Pamela
    Harvie, Heidi
    Rahn, David
    Jeppson, Peter
    Paraiso, Marie
    Thomas, Sonia
    Mazloomdoost, Donna
    FEMALE PELVIC MEDICINE AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2020, 26 (07): : 415 - 424