Design of Public Projects: Outsource or In-House?

被引:7
|
作者
Griffis, F. H. [1 ]
Choi, Hyunchul [1 ]
机构
[1] NYU, Dept Civil Engn, Polytech Inst, Brooklyn, NY USA
关键词
Management; Cost; Organization;
D O I
10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000110
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
This study analyzes the relative cost in New York state of having the public sector perform design work in-house or to contract out the work to private engineering consulting companies. It is important to note that the percentage of work performed in-house versus that which is contracted out varies among New York state agencies and authorities. Many agencies target a design work load of 25% in-house and 75% contracted out to accomplish their programs and in-house training goals. New York State Department of Transportation (NYSDOT) has reported that it performs 50% or more of its work with in-house forces, although in some regions the in-house design percentage is as high as approximately 80%. Because the authors believe this to be a very high percentage of in-house work when compared with other New York state agencies and authorities, the authors have chosen to focus this cost-effectiveness comparison on transportation projects and the NYSDOT. While a few studies have been conducted in this area, they were based primarily on subjective analysis using extremely limited data, if any. While one may anticipate that the cost of a design engineer would generally be comparable whether he or she is in the public or private sector, this study found that because of the generous benefits package provided by the state of New York, the large amount of paid time off, and, most likely, a lower utilization factor for an in-house design engineer, his or her actual expected cost to the taxpayer exceeds the cost of a private design engineer by approximately 15%. These calculations are based on what the authors consider conservative assumptions; the actual difference considerably exceeds this value in all probability. The total cost to the taxpayer of a career NYSDOT employee is in excess of $6.4 million over his or her lifetime. With the consideration of forecasting pension costs, the career employee cost amounts to approximately $6.5 million. DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000110. (C) 2013 American Society of Civil Engineers.
引用
下载
收藏
页码:2 / 9
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] A longitudinal study on public policy and the health of in-house caregivers in Europe
    Calvo-Perxas, Laia
    Vilalta-Franch, Joan
    Litwin, Howard
    Mira, Pedro
    Garre-Olmo, Josep
    HEALTH POLICY, 2021, 125 (04) : 436 - 441
  • [42] IN-HOUSE USE OF MATERIALS IN PUBLIC-LIBRARIES - RUBIN,R
    MCCLURE, CR
    LIBRARY QUARTERLY, 1988, 58 (02): : 207 - 208
  • [43] RAI - combining European collaborative projects with vital in-house R&D
    Cominetti, M.
    EBU Technical Review, (273): : 21 - 29
  • [44] IN-HOUSE IC DESIGN REDUCES COSTS AND INCREASES CONTROL
    FRIEDMAN, MGW
    EDN MAGAZINE-ELECTRICAL DESIGN NEWS, 1985, 30 (09): : 265 - 269
  • [45] STANDARDIZATION FACILITATED BY DUKES IN-HOUSE CAPABILITY FOR DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION
    MATHEWS, TA
    NUCLEAR ENGINEERING INTERNATIONAL, 1977, 22 (265): : 37 - 39
  • [46] In-house issues
    Anon
    HOW, 2001, 16 (01):
  • [47] IN-HOUSE RELOCATION
    ISZARD, M
    PERSONNEL JOURNAL, 1985, 64 (01) : 6 - 6
  • [48] BUREAU TO IN-HOUSE
    不详
    DATA PROCESSING, 1977, 19 (01): : 16 - 17
  • [49] IN-HOUSE ACCOUNTANT
    NEEDLEMAN, T
    POPULAR COMPUTING, 1985, 5 (01): : 100 - &
  • [50] In-house microbiology
    Brown, PA
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 18TH ANNUAL CONFERENCE ON AVIAN MEDICINE AND SURGERY, 1997, : 29 - 33