Bayesian inferences for receiver operating characteristic curves in the absence of a gold standard

被引:65
|
作者
Choi, Young-Ku
Johnson, Wesley O.
Collins, Michael T.
Gardner, Ian A.
机构
[1] Univ Illinois, Inst Hlth Res & Policy, Chicago, IL 60608 USA
[2] Univ Calif Irvine, Dept Stat, Irvine, CA 92697 USA
[3] Univ Wisconsin, Sch Vet Med, Dept Pathobiol Sci, Madison, WI 53705 USA
[4] Univ Calif Davis, Sch Vet Med, Dept Med & Epidemiol, Davis, CA 95616 USA
关键词
diagnostic test; Markov chain Monte Carlo; sensitivity; serology; specificity;
D O I
10.1198/108571106X110883
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Sensitivity and specificity are used to characterize the accuracy of a diagnostic test. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis can be used more generally to plot the sensitivity versus (1-specificity) over all possible cutoff points. We develop an ROC analysis that can be applied to diagnostic tests with and without a gold standard. Moreover, the method can be applied to multiple correlated diagnostic tests that are used on the same individual. Simulation studies were performed to assess the discrimination ability of the no-gold-standard method compared with the situation where a gold standard exists. We used the area under the ROC curve (AUC) to quantify the diagnostic accuracy of tests and the difference between AUCs to compare their accuracies. In particular, we can estimate the prevalence of disease/infection under the no-gold-standard method. The method we proposed works well in the absence of a gold standard for correlated test data. Correlation affected the width of posterior probability intervals for these differences. The proposed method was used to analyze ELISA test scores for Johne's disease in dairy cattle.
引用
收藏
页码:210 / 229
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] A permutation test to compare receiver operating characteristic curves
    Venkatraman, ES
    BIOMETRICS, 2000, 56 (04) : 1134 - 1138
  • [42] Comparison of the binormal and Lehman receiver operating characteristic curves
    Ghebremichael, Musie
    Michael, Haben
    COMMUNICATIONS IN STATISTICS-SIMULATION AND COMPUTATION, 2024, 53 (02) : 772 - 785
  • [43] Part 27 - Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves
    Coleman, David
    Vanatta, Lynn
    AMERICAN LABORATORY, 2007, 39 (16) : 28 - 29
  • [44] Evaluation of Diagnostic Tests: Receiver Operating Characteristic Curves
    Baicus, Cristian
    Hristea, Adriana
    Baicus, Anda
    REVISTA ROMANA DE MEDICINA DE LABORATOR, 2011, 19 (03): : 303 - 306
  • [45] Correcting for confounding in analyzing receiver operating characteristic curves
    Smith, PJ
    Thompson, TJ
    BIOMETRICAL JOURNAL, 1996, 38 (07) : 857 - 863
  • [46] The use of receiver operating characteristic curves in biomedical informatics
    Lasko, TA
    Bhagwat, JG
    Zou, KH
    Ohno-Machado, L
    JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL INFORMATICS, 2005, 38 (05) : 404 - 415
  • [47] Nonparametric confidence intervals for receiver operating characteristic curves
    Hall, P
    Hyndman, RJ
    Fan, YN
    BIOMETRIKA, 2004, 91 (03) : 743 - 750
  • [48] Comparison of receiver operating characteristic curves on the basis of optimal operating points
    Halpern, EJ
    Albert, M
    Krieger, AM
    Metz, CE
    Maidment, AD
    ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 1996, 3 (03) : 245 - 253
  • [49] Bayesian bootstrap inference for the receiver operating characteristic surface
    de Carvalho, Vanda Inacio
    de Carvalho, Miguel
    Branscum, Adam
    STAT, 2018, 7 (01):
  • [50] Bayesian receiver operating characteristic metric for linear classifiers
    Hassan, Syeda Sakira
    Huttunen, Heikki
    Niemi, Jari
    Tohka, Jussi
    PATTERN RECOGNITION LETTERS, 2019, 128 : 52 - 59