Improved contour detection model with spatial summation properties based on nonclassical receptive field

被引:10
|
作者
Lin, Chuan [1 ,2 ]
Xu, Guili [1 ]
Cao, Yijun [2 ]
Liang, Chenghua [2 ]
Li, Ya [2 ]
机构
[1] Nanjing Univ Aeronaut & Astronaut, Coll Automat Engn, 29 Yudao St, Nanjing 210016, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[2] Guangxi Univ Sci & Technol, Coll Elect & Informat Engn, 268 Donghuan Rd, Liuzhou 545006, Guangxi, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
visual cortex; contour detection; nonclassical receptive field; neural modeling; PRIMARY VISUAL-CORTEX; SURROUND SUPPRESSION; FEEDBACK CONNECTIONS; INHIBITION; V1; RESPONSES; PATTERNS; NEURONS; V2; EXTRACTION;
D O I
10.1117/1.JEI.25.4.043018
中图分类号
TM [电工技术]; TN [电子技术、通信技术];
学科分类号
0808 ; 0809 ;
摘要
The responses of cortical neurons to a stimulus in a classical receptive field (CRF) can be modulated by stimulating the non-CRF (nCRF) of neurons in the primary visual cortex (V1). In the very early stages (at around 40 ms), a neuron in V1 exhibits strong responses to a small set of stimuli. Later, however (after 100 ms), the neurons in V1 become sensitive to the scene's global organization. As per these visual cortical mechanisms, a contour detection model based on the spatial summation properties is proposed. Unlike in previous studies, the responses of the nCRF to the higher visual cortex that results in the inhibition of the neuronal responses in the primary visual cortex by the feedback pathway are considered. In this model, the individual neurons in V1 receive global information from the higher visual cortex to participate in the inhibition process. Computationally, global Gabor energy features are involved, leading to the more coherent physiological characteristics of the nCRF. We conducted an experiment where we compared our model with those proposed by other researchers. Our model explains the role of the mutual inhibition of neurons in V1, together with an approach for object recognition in machine vision. (C) 2016 SPIE and IS&T
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The spatial summation characteristics of three categories of VI neurons differing in non-classical receptive field modulation properties
    Chen, Ke
    Song, Xue-Mei
    Dai, Zheng-Qiang
    Yin, Jiao-Jiao
    Xu, Xing-Zhen
    Li, Chao-Yi
    [J]. VISION RESEARCH, 2014, 96 : 87 - 95
  • [22] Edge Detection Based on Receptive Field
    da Silva, Adivaldo Jose
    de Sousa, Alex Luiz
    [J]. 2017 WORKSHOP OF COMPUTER VISION (WVC), 2017, : 126 - 131
  • [23] Weighted KPCA Degree of Homogeneity Amended Nonclassical Receptive Field Inhibition Model for Salient Contour Extraction in Low-Light-Level Image
    Zhang, Yi
    Han, Jing
    Yue, Jiang
    Bai, Lian-Fa
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON IMAGE PROCESSING, 2014, 23 (06) : 2732 - 2743
  • [24] Improved lesion detection by level-dependent spatial summation
    Collaris, RJ
    Hoeks, APG
    [J]. ACOUSTICAL IMAGING, VOL 22, 1996, 22 : 257 - 262
  • [25] Improved lesion detection by level-dependent spatial summation
    Collaris, RJ
    Hoeks, APG
    [J]. ULTRASONIC IMAGING, 1995, 17 (03) : 197 - 226
  • [26] SPATIAL SUMMATION IN RECEPTIVE FIELD PERIPHERY OF 2 TYPES OF ON-CENTER NEURONS IN CAT RETINA
    WINTERS, RW
    HICKEY, TL
    SKAER, DH
    [J]. VISION RESEARCH, 1973, 13 (08) : 1499 - 1509
  • [27] An Improved GAC Model for Lip Contour Detection
    Feng, Xiaohui
    He, Qianhua
    Wang, Weining
    [J]. ICSP: 2008 9TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SIGNAL PROCESSING, VOLS 1-5, PROCEEDINGS, 2008, : 1216 - 1219
  • [28] A Receptive Field Based Approach For Face Detection
    Fernandes, Bruno J. T.
    Cavalcanti, George D. C.
    Ren, Tsang I.
    [J]. IJCNN: 2009 INTERNATIONAL JOINT CONFERENCE ON NEURAL NETWORKS, VOLS 1- 6, 2009, : 3032 - 3039
  • [29] Neural mechanisms in boundary grouping, illusory contour generation, and spatial tuning of receptive field selectivity
    Neumann, H.
    Moessner, P.
    [J]. PERCEPTION, 1996, 25 : 28 - 28
  • [30] Spatial receptive field properties of rat retinal ganglion cells
    Heine, Walter F.
    Passaglia, Christopher L.
    [J]. VISUAL NEUROSCIENCE, 2011, 28 (05) : 403 - 417