Energy Payback Time (EPBT) and Energy Return on Energy Invested (EROI) of Perovskite Tandem Photovoltaic Solar Cells

被引:55
|
作者
Celik, Ilke [1 ]
Philips, Adam B. [2 ]
Song, Zhaoning [2 ]
Yan, Yanfa [2 ]
Ellingson, Randy J. [2 ]
Heben, Michael J. [2 ]
Apul, Defne [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Toledo, Sch Solar & Adv Renewable Energy, Dept Civil Engn, Toledo, OH 43606 USA
[2] Univ Toledo, Sch Solar & Adv Renewable Energy, Wright Ctr Photovolta Innovat & Commercializat, Dept Phys & Astron, Toledo, OH 43606 USA
来源
IEEE JOURNAL OF PHOTOVOLTAICS | 2018年 / 8卷 / 01期
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Energy payback time; energy returned on investment; perovskite top cell; tandem solar cells; LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT; MODERATE INSOLATION; SILICON; SYSTEMS; REGIONS;
D O I
10.1109/JPHOTOV.2017.2768961
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
Two-terminal tandem perovskite (PK) cells are considered a promising option for future photovoltaic (PV) market due to the rapid improvements in their power conversion efficiencies. However, their large-scale adoption requires a better understanding on the energy performance of these PVs. In this paper, the life-cycle energy consumptions of two-terminal tandem solar cells consisting of lead-based PK top cells prepared on bottom cells of copper indium gallium selenide, copper zinc tin selenide, and monocrystalline silicon are evaluated. The energy payback time (EPBT) and the energy return on invested (EROI) are the two use-fulmetrics for examining the energy generation performance of PV systems. EPBTs of the current state-of-the-art devices range from 7 months to 12 months, while the EROI of the cells is in the reverse order as the EPBT and ranged between 5.2 and 9.2. These two energy indicators of tandem devices are expected to improve as the tandem PV technologies mature, with an EBPT as low as similar to 27 day (0.9 month) and the EROI as high as 105 for high-efficiency long-lifetime devices.
引用
收藏
页码:305 / 309
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Ideal EROI (energy return on investment) deepens the understanding of energy systems
    Atlason, Reynir
    Unnthorsson, Runar
    ENERGY, 2014, 67 : 241 - 245
  • [22] Energy Return on Investment (EROI) of Oil Shale
    Cleveland, Cutler J.
    O'Connor, Peter A.
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2011, 3 (11): : 2307 - 2322
  • [23] Estimate of the Societal Energy Return on Investment (EROI)
    Elise Dupont
    Marc Germain
    Hervé Jeanmart
    Biophysical Economics and Sustainability, 2021, 6 (1)
  • [24] New perspectives on the energy return on (energy) investment (EROI) of corn ethanol
    Murphy D.J.
    Hall C.A.S.
    Powers B.
    Environment, Development and Sustainability, 2011, 13 (1) : 179 - 202
  • [25] Energy payback time and carbon footprint of commercial photovoltaic systems
    de Wild-Scholten, M. J.
    SOLAR ENERGY MATERIALS AND SOLAR CELLS, 2013, 119 : 296 - 305
  • [26] Study on Energy Payback Time of Building Integrated Photovoltaic System
    Huang, Dikai
    Yu, Tai
    10TH INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON HEATING, VENTILATION AND AIR CONDITIONING, ISHVAC2017, 2017, 205 : 1087 - 1092
  • [27] Design, Greenhouse Emissions, and Environmental Payback of a Photovoltaic Solar Energy System
    Schultz, Herwin Saito
    Carvalho, Monica
    ENERGIES, 2022, 15 (16)
  • [28] Impact of Global Energy Resources Based on Energy Return on their Investment (EROI) Parameters
    del Castillo-Mussot, Marcelo
    Ugalde-Velez, Pablo
    Antonio Montemayor-Aldrete, Jorge
    de la Lama-Garcia, Alfredo
    Cruz, Fidel
    PERSPECTIVES ON GLOBAL DEVELOPMENT AND TECHNOLOGY, 2016, 15 (1-2) : 290 - 299
  • [29] Modelling energy transition risk: The impact of declining energy return on investment (EROI)
    Jackson, Andrew
    Jackson, Tim
    ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2021, 185
  • [30] Making energy green - A method for quantifying the ecosystem maintenance energy and the green energy return on energy invested
    Daaboul, Jessica
    Moriarty, Patrick
    Palmer, Graham
    Honnery, Damon
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2022, 344