MORPHOLOGICAL VARIATION AS A TOOL FOR MONITORING BIRD POPULATIONS: A REVIEW

被引:23
|
作者
Luis Telleria, Jose [1 ]
de la Hera, Ivan [2 ]
Perez-Tris, Javier [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Complutense Madrid CEI Moncloa, Fac Biol, Dept Zool & Phys Anthropol, Madrid 28040, Spain
[2] Univ Pais Vasco UPV EHU, Dept Zool & Anim Cell Biol, Vitoria 01006, Spain
来源
关键词
allometry; biodiversity monitoring; bird conservation; body condition; intra-specific variation; phenotypic plasticity; BLACKCAPS SYLVIA-ATRICAPILLA; FEATHER GROWTH-RATE; FLUCTUATING ASYMMETRY; BODY-SIZE; FORAGING BEHAVIOR; WING-SHAPE; SEDENTARY BLACKCAPS; MIGRATORY BEHAVIOR; BILL MORPHOLOGY; DEVELOPMENTAL STABILITY;
D O I
10.13157/arla.60.2.2013.191
中图分类号
Q95 [动物学];
学科分类号
071002 ;
摘要
This paper shows how our knowledge of the evolution, ecology and conservation of birds can be improved through the analysis of external morphological traits. After giving a short history of morphological studies of birds, we discuss the pros and cons of such data in exploring within-species variation and describe the main patterns and hypotheses related to the factors affecting bird size and shape. We describe the usefulness of external measurements (including body mass and feather morphology) of live birds for inferring population differentiation or intraspecific variation in body condition. Bird morphology monitoring is conceptually similar to other programs aimed at recording the distribution of species and their habitats. However, it has one additional advantage: the same data used to describe variation can be used to infer the processes underlying observed changes by testing geographical or ecomorphological predictions. Morphological approaches may be implemented in the context of national ringing schemes, in which thousands of birds are measured each year. They may be particularly illustrative in bird species with populations distributed between regions of contrasting ecology, or wherever man-made environmental stressors affect bird populations.
引用
收藏
页码:191 / 224
页数:34
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Morphological variation on isolated populations of Praocis (Praocis) spinolai
    Benitez, Hugo A.
    Pizarro-Araya, Jaime
    Bravi, Raffaella
    Sanzana, Maria-Jose
    Alfaro, Fermin M.
    JOURNAL OF INSECT SCIENCE, 2014, 14
  • [22] RECENT QUANTITATIVE WORK ON BRITISH BIRD POPULATIONS - REVIEW
    TAYLOR, SM
    JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL STATISTICAL SOCIETY SERIES D-THE STATISTICIAN, 1966, 16 (02) : 119 - 170
  • [23] The contribution of ringing to the conservation and management of bird populations: A review
    Baillie, SR
    ARDEA, 2001, 89 (01) : 167 - 184
  • [24] Spatial Sorting Drives Morphological Variation in the Invasive Bird, Acridotheris tristis
    Berthouly-Salazar, Cecile
    van Rensburg, Berndt J.
    Le Roux, Johannes J.
    van Vuuren, Bettine J.
    Hui, Cang
    PLOS ONE, 2012, 7 (05):
  • [25] Complex patterns of morphological diversity across multiple populations of an urban bird species
    Diamant, Eleanor S.
    Yeh, Pamela J.
    EVOLUTION, 2024, : 1325 - 1337
  • [26] Complex patterns of morphological diversity across multiple populations of an urban bird species
    Diamant, Eleanor S.
    Yeh, Pamela J.
    EVOLUTION, 2024, 78 (07) : 1325 - 1337
  • [27] Transaction records as a tool for bird trade monitoring in supporting bird's conservation and sustainable use
    Irham, M.
    Yohanna
    Kurniawan, P. T.
    3RD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON BIOSCIENCES, 2020, 457
  • [28] Recommendations for assessing trends in forest bird populations based on the experience of the Ontario Forest Bird Monitoring Program
    Schalk, G
    Dewar, HJ
    Cadman, MD
    JOURNAL OF FIELD ORNITHOLOGY, 2002, 73 (04) : 340 - 350
  • [29] Morphological and karyotypic variation in three wild populations of Meretrix meretrix
    Deng Yuewen
    Du Xiaodong
    Huang Ronglian
    Wang Qingheng
    CHINESE JOURNAL OF OCEANOLOGY AND LIMNOLOGY, 2008, 26 (01): : 76 - 80
  • [30] THE MORPHOLOGICAL VARIATION OF SOME CRATAEGUS POPULATIONS (ROSACEAE) IN GREECE AND YUGOSLAVIA
    CHRISTENSEN, KI
    NORDIC JOURNAL OF BOTANY, 1984, 4 (05) : 585 - 595