Anthropometric standardisation and quality control protocols for the construction of new, international, fetal and newborn growth standards: the INTERGROWTH-21st Project

被引:47
|
作者
Ismail, L. Cheikh [1 ,2 ]
Knight, H. E. [1 ,2 ]
Ohuma, E. O. [1 ,2 ]
Hoch, L. [1 ,2 ]
Chumlea, W. C. [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Oxford, Nuffield Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Oxford OX3 9DU, England
[2] Univ Oxford, Oxford Maternal & Perinatal Hlth Inst, Green Templeton Coll, Oxford OX3 9DU, England
[3] Wright State Univ, Lifespan Hlth Res Ctr, Dept Community Hlth, Boonshoft Sch Med, Dayton, OH 45435 USA
[4] Wright State Univ, Dept Pediat, Boonshoft Sch Med, Dayton, OH 45435 USA
基金
比尔及梅琳达.盖茨基金会;
关键词
Anthropometry; fetal growth; INTERGROWTH-21st; newborn measurements; quality control protocols; standardisation;
D O I
10.1111/1471-0528.12127
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
The primary aim of the INTERGROWTH-21(st) Project is to construct new, prescriptive standards describing optimal fetal and preterm postnatal growth. The anthropometric measurements include the head circumference, recumbent length and weight of the infants, and the stature and weight of the parents. In such a large, international, multicentre project, it is critical that all study sites follow standardised protocols to ensure maximal validity of the growth and nutrition indicators used. This paper describes in detail the anthropometric training, standardisation and quality control procedures used to collect data for these new standards. The initial standardisation session was in Nairobi, Kenya, using newborns, which was followed by similar sessions in the eight participating study sites in Brazil, China, India, Italy, Kenya, Oman, UK and USA. The intraobserver and inter-observer technical error of measurement values for head circumference range from 0.3 to 0.4cm, and for recumbent length from 0.3 to 0.5cm. These standardisation protocols implemented at each study site worldwide ensure that the anthropometric data collected are of the highest quality to construct international growth standards.
引用
收藏
页码:48 / 55
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] A Comparison of UK Preterm Anthropometric Charts and INTERGROWTH-21st: Is It Time to Change Growth Charts?
    Bendor-Samuel, Owen Martyn
    Zivanovic, Sanja
    Odd, David
    Roehr, Charles Christoph
    NEONATOLOGY, 2020, 117 (03) : 300 - 307
  • [32] More validation is needed before widespread adoption of INTERGROWTH-21st fetal growth reference standards in France Reply
    Stirnemann, J.
    Salomon, L. J.
    ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2017, 49 (04) : 548 - 548
  • [33] Fetal growth standards: the NICHD fetal growth study approach in context with INTERGROWTH-21st and the World Health Organization Multicentre Growth Reference Study
    Grantz, Katherine L.
    Hediger, Mary L.
    Liu, Danping
    Louis, Germaine M. Buck
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2018, 218 (02) : S641 - +
  • [34] Estimated fetal weight standards of the INTERGROWTH-21st project for the prediction of adverse outcomes: a systematic review with meta-analysis
    Rebelo, Fernanda
    Carrilho, Thais R. B.
    Canuto, Raquel
    Schlussel, Michael M.
    Farias, Dayana R.
    Ohuma, Eric O.
    Kac, Gilberto
    JOURNAL OF MATERNAL-FETAL & NEONATAL MEDICINE, 2023, 36 (02):
  • [35] Postnatal growth standards for preterm infants: the Preterm Postnatal Follow-up Study of the INTERGROWTH-21st Project
    Villar, Jose
    Giuliani, Francesca
    Bhutta, Zulfiqar A.
    Bertino, Enrico
    Ohuma, Eric O.
    Ismail, Leila Cheikh
    Barros, Fernando C.
    Altman, Douglas G.
    Victora, Cesar
    Noble, Julia A.
    Gravett, Michael G.
    Purwar, Manorama
    Pang, Ruyan
    Lambert, Ann
    Papageorghiou, Aris T.
    Ochieng, Roseline
    Jaffer, Yasmin A.
    Kennedy, Stephen H.
    LANCET GLOBAL HEALTH, 2015, 3 (11): : E681 - E691
  • [36] Ethical issues arising from the INTERGROWTH-21st Fetal Growth Longitudinal Study
    Burton, F.
    BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2013, 120 : 77 - 80
  • [37] Gestational weight gain standards based on women enrolled in the Fetal Growth Longitudinal Study of the INTERGROWTH-21st Project: a prospective longitudinal cohort study
    Ismail, Leila Cheikh
    Bishop, Deborah C.
    Pang, Ruyan
    Ohuma, Eric O.
    Kac, Gilberto
    Abrams, Barbara
    Rasmussen, Kathleen
    Barros, Fernando C.
    Hirst, Jane E.
    Lambert, Ann
    Papageorghiou, Aris T.
    Stones, William
    Jaffer, Yasmin A.
    Altman, Douglas G.
    Noble, J. Alison
    Giolito, Maria Rosa
    Gravett, Michael G.
    Purwar, Manorama
    Kennedy, Stephen H.
    Bhutta, Zulfiqar A.
    Villar, Jose
    BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2016, 352
  • [38] INTERGROWTH-21st Gestational Dating and Fetal and Newborn Growth Standards in Peri-Urban Nairobi, Kenya: Quasi-Experimental Implementation Study Protocol
    Millar, Kathryn
    Patel, Suha
    Munson, Meghan
    Vesel, Linda
    Subbiah, Shalini
    Jones, Rachel M.
    Little, Sarah
    Papageorghiou, Aris T.
    Villar, Jose
    Wegner, Mary Nell
    Pearson, Nick
    Muigai, Faith
    Ongeti, Catherine
    Langer, Ana
    JMIR RESEARCH PROTOCOLS, 2018, 7 (06):
  • [39] Implementing the INTERGROWTH-21st fetal growth standards in France: a 'flash study' of the College Francais d'Echographie Foetale (CFEF)
    Stirnemann, J. J.
    Fries, N.
    Bessis, R.
    Fontanges, M.
    Mangione, R.
    Salomon, L. J.
    ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2017, 49 (04) : 487 - 492
  • [40] International Standards for Symphysis-Fundal Height Based on Serial Measurements From the Fetal Growth Longitudinal Study of the INTERGROWTH-21st Project: Prospective Cohort Study in Eight Countries
    Papageorghiou, Aris T.
    Ohuma, Eric O.
    Gravett, Michael G.
    Hirst, Jane
    da Silveira, Mariangela F.
    Lambert, Ann
    Carvalho, Maria
    Jaffer, Yasmin A.
    Altman, Douglas G.
    Noble, Julia A.
    Bertino, Enrico
    Purwar, Manorama
    Pang, Ruyan
    Ismail, Leila Cheikh
    Lambert, Ann
    Bhutta, Zulfiqar A.
    Kennedy, Stephen H.
    Villar, Jose
    OBSTETRICAL & GYNECOLOGICAL SURVEY, 2017, 72 (03) : 141 - 143