SOIL MOISTURE DATA PRODUCT GENERATED FROM NASA SMAP OBSERVATIONS WITH NOAA ANCILLARY DATA

被引:3
|
作者
Zhan, Xiwu [1 ]
Liu, Jicheng [1 ,2 ]
Wen, Jun [3 ]
Zhao, Limin [4 ]
Vargas, Marco [1 ]
Weng, Fuzhong [1 ]
机构
[1] NOAA, NESDIS, Ctr Satellite Applicat & Res, Washington, DC 20230 USA
[2] UMD ESSIC, Cooperate Inst Climate Sci, Riverdale Pk, MA USA
[3] NOAA, NESDIS, Off Satellite Prod Operat, Washington, DC USA
[4] Chinese Acad Sci, Cold & Arid Reg Environm & Engn Res Inst, Beijing, Peoples R China
关键词
satellite soil moisture; SMAP; SMOPS;
D O I
10.1109/IGARSS.2016.7730364
中图分类号
TM [电工技术]; TN [电子技术、通信技术];
学科分类号
0808 ; 0809 ;
摘要
NASA Soil Moisture Active/Passive (SMAP) satellite was launched on January 31 st, 2015 and has been providing level-1B radiometer brightness temperature (L1B-TB) data with an official latency of 12 hours since April 2015. The primary application users of the SMAP radiometer observations include numerical weather prediction operations that require shorter data latency (e. g. less than 6 hours). With slightly simplified algorithms of the L1B-TB data, NASA SMAP project is also providing near real time (NRT) L1B-TB data to NOAA operational users with a latency ranging from 2-6 hours. With this latency NOAA NWP models could use most of those SMAP half-orbit data that arrives within the 6 hour cut-off time limit. Before a radiance data assimilation capability for NOAA NWP models is developed, NOAA NESDIS is retrieving soil moisture from the NRT L1B-TB data through its Soil Moisture Product System (SMOPS) and makes surface soil moisture directly available for assimilation into the NWP models with the shortest possible turn-around time. Unlike using NASA GEOS model surface and soil temperature and multi-year average vegetation index data, SMOPS soil moisture retrieval algorithm uses the surface temperature data from operational Global Forecast System (GFS) and the vegetation index (NDVI) data from the near real time Suomi-NPP VIIRS observations. This paper introduce the structure of SMOPS, the soil moisture retrieval algorithm for SMAP data, and validation of the soil moisture data products against in the situ soil moisture measurements collected from the Soil Climate Analysis Networks of US Department of Agriculture and the Tibetan Soil Moisture Networks of Chinese Academy of Sciences. The soil moisture data retrieved from SMAP NRT TB data through SMOPS are also evaluated against the NASA official SMAP Level 2/3 soil moisture products. Preliminary validation results indicate that the SMAP soil moisture product from the SMAP NRT TB data and NESDIS SMOPS has similar quality to the NASA official products, but has shorter latency which may be critical to NOAA NWP operations.
引用
收藏
页码:5237 / 5240
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Downscaling of SMAP Soil Moisture Using Land Surface Temperature and Vegetation Data
    Fang, Bin
    Lakshmi, Venkataraman
    Bindlish, Rajat
    Jackson, Thomas J.
    [J]. VADOSE ZONE JOURNAL, 2018, 17 (01)
  • [32] Assessing Hydrological Modelling Driven by Different Precipitation Datasets via the SMAP Soil Moisture Product and Gauged Streamflow Data
    Yi, Lu
    Zhang, Wanchang
    Li, Xiangyang
    [J]. REMOTE SENSING, 2018, 10 (12):
  • [33] SMAP SOIL MOISTURE PRODUCT VALIDITY IN HETEROGENEOUS IRRIGATED REGIONS
    Worrall, George
    Judge, Jasmeet
    Barrett, Charles
    [J]. IGARSS 2020 - 2020 IEEE INTERNATIONAL GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING SYMPOSIUM, 2020, : 4719 - 4722
  • [34] Development and assessment of the SMAP enhanced passive soil moisture product
    Chan, S. K.
    Bindlish, R.
    O'Neill, P.
    Jackson, T.
    Njoku, E.
    Dunbar, S.
    Chaubell, J.
    Piepmeier, J.
    Yueh, S.
    Entekhabi, D.
    Colliander, A.
    Chen, F.
    Cosh, M. H.
    Caldwell, T.
    Walker, J.
    Berg, A.
    McNairn, H.
    Thibeault, M.
    Martinez-Fernandez, J.
    Uldall, F.
    Seyfried, M.
    Bosch, D.
    Starks, P.
    Collins, C. Holifield
    Prueger, J.
    van der Velde, R.
    Asanuma, J.
    Palecki, M.
    Small, E. E.
    Zreda, M.
    Calvet, J.
    Crow, W. T.
    Kerr, Y.
    [J]. REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT, 2018, 204 : 931 - 941
  • [35] Soil Moisture Active Passive (SMAP) Data for Ground Monitoring during Earthquakes
    Farahani, Ali
    Ghayoomi, Majid
    Jacobs, Jennifer M.
    [J]. GEO-CONGRESS 2023: GEOTECHNICAL DATA ANALYSIS AND COMPUTATION, 2023, 342 : 409 - 418
  • [36] Estimating Basin-Scale Water Budgets With SMAP Soil Moisture Data
    Koster, Randal D.
    Crow, Wade T.
    Reichle, Rolf H.
    Mahanama, Sarith P.
    [J]. WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 2018, 54 (07) : 4228 - 4244
  • [37] SMAP Soil Moisture Product Assessment over Wales, UK, Using Observations from the WSMN Ground Monitoring Network
    Gupta, Dileep Kumar
    Srivastava, Prashant K.
    Singh, Ankita
    Petropoulos, George P.
    Stathopoulos, Nikolaos
    Prasad, Rajendra
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2021, 13 (11)
  • [38] Utilizing SMAP Soil Moisture Data to Constrain Irrigation in the Community Land Model
    Felfelani, Farshid
    Pokhrel, Yadu
    Guan, Kaiyu
    Lawrence, David M.
    [J]. GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2018, 45 (23) : 12892 - 12902
  • [39] EVALUATION OF SMAP LEVEL 2 SOIL MOISTURE ALGORITHMS USING SMOS DATA
    Bindlish, Rajat
    Jackson, Thomas J.
    Zhao, Tianjie
    Cosh, Michael
    Chan, Steven
    O'Neill, Peggy
    Njoku, Eni
    Colliander, Andreas
    Kerr, Yann
    Shi, J. C.
    [J]. 2011 IEEE INTERNATIONAL GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING SYMPOSIUM (IGARSS), 2011, : 2444 - 2447
  • [40] Assessing Performances of Multivariate Data Assimilation Algorithms with SMOS, SMAP, and GRACE Observations for Improved Soil Moisture and Groundwater Analyses
    Tangdamrongsub, Natthachet
    Dong, Jianzhi
    Shellito, Peter
    [J]. WATER, 2022, 14 (04)