Sensitivity of clinically relevant dosimetric parameters to contouring uncertainty in postimplant dosimetry of low-dose-rate prostate permanent seed brachytherapy

被引:8
|
作者
Mashouf, Shahram [1 ,2 ]
Safigholi, Habib [3 ]
Merino, Tomas [2 ,4 ]
Soliman, Abraam [3 ]
Ravi, Ananth [1 ,2 ]
Morton, Gerard [2 ,4 ]
Song, William Y. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Sunnybrook Odette Canc Ctr, Dept Med Phys, 2075 Bayview Ave, Toronto, ON M4N 3M5, Canada
[2] Univ Toronto, Dept Radiat Oncol, Toronto, ON, Canada
[3] Sunnybrook Hlth Sci Ctr, Sunnybrook Res Inst, Toronto, ON, Canada
[4] Sunnybrook Odette Canc Ctr, Dept Radiat Oncol, Toronto, ON, Canada
关键词
LDR prostate seed brachytherapy; Postimplant dosimetry; Prostate delineation; D-90 and V-100; CT-BASED DOSIMETRY; INTEROBSERVER VARIABILITY; RADIATION-THERAPY; URINARY RETENTION; IMAGE FUSION; IMPLANT; MRI; VOLUMES;
D O I
10.1016/j.brachy.2016.08.013
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
PURPOSE: There is strong evidence relating postimplant dosimetry for low-dose-rate prostate seed brachytherapy to local control rates. The delineation of the prostate on CT images, however, represents a challenge due to the lack of soft-tissue contrast to identify the prostate borders. This study aims at quantifying the sensitivity of prostate V-100 and D-90 to contouring uncertainty as clinically relevant parameters for evaluation of target coverage in postimplant dosimetry. METHODS AND MATERIALS: CT images, postoperative plans, and contours of a cohort of patients (n = 43; low risk = 55.8%, intermediate risk = 39.5%, high risk = 4.7%), who had received prostate seed brachytherapy, were imported into MIM Symphony treatment planning system. The prostate contours in postimplant CT images were expanded or contracted uniformly in extents of +/- 1.00 mm, +/- 2.00 mm, +/- 3.00 mm, +/- 4.00 mm, and +/- 5.00 mm. The values for V-100 and D-90 were extracted from dose-volume histograms for each contour and compared. RESULTS: Significant changes were observed in the values of D-90 and V-100 as well as the number of inacceptable plans for expansion or contraction of only few millimeters. Evaluation of a plan coverage based on D-90 was found to be less sensitive to systematic contouring errors compared with V-100. Number of plans incorrectly identified for lack or adequacy of coverage is lower using D-90 compared with V-100 for the same margin of error. CONCLUSIONS: Evaluation of a plan coverage based on V-100 is too sensitive to systematic contouring errors of prostate. D-90 increases the accuracy of CT-based postimplant quality assurance in identifying plans with insufficient coverage compared with V-100. 2016 American Brachytherapy Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:774 / 779
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Examining the relationship between pre- and postimplant geometry in prostate low-dose-rate brachytherapy and its correlation with dosimetric quality using the similarity concept
    Todor, Dorin A.
    Anscher, Mitchell S.
    Hagan, Michael P.
    [J]. BRACHYTHERAPY, 2014, 13 (05) : 471 - 480
  • [32] Regional Quadrant Dosimetry and Late Genitourinary Toxicity After Low-Dose-Rate Prostate Brachytherapy
    Hamilton, S.
    Keyes, M.
    Moravan, V.
    Spadinger, I.
    Morris, W. J.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2015, 93 (03): : E189 - E190
  • [33] Dosimetric Characteristics for a Low-Dose-Rate Brachytherapy Stent for Esophageal Cancer
    Rivard, Mark J.
    Herskovic, Arnold M.
    Hingston, John H.
    Clerc, Claude
    Favreau, John T.
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2017, 44 (06) : 3125 - 3125
  • [34] Radiation protection and dosimetry issues for patients with prostate cancer after I-125 low-dose-rate brachytherapy permanent implant
    Licciardello, Tiziana
    Feliciani, Giacomo
    Mazzotti, Giorgio
    Mostacci, Domiziano
    Sarnelli, Anna
    Menghi, Enrico
    [J]. BRACHYTHERAPY, 2021, 20 (01) : 272 - 278
  • [35] Dosimetric Predictors of Sexual Function Decline Following Low-Dose-Rate Brachytherapy for Prostate Cancer (PCa)
    Mian, O. Y.
    Robertson, S. P.
    Narang, A.
    Agarwal, S.
    Bae, H. J.
    McNutt, T. R.
    Tran, P. T.
    DeWeese, T. L.
    Song, D.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2015, 93 (03): : S123 - S123
  • [36] Relapse patterns after low-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy
    Lamb, David S.
    Greig, Lynne
    FitzJohn, Trevor
    Russell, Grant L.
    Nacey, John N.
    Iupati, Douglas
    Woods, Lisa
    [J]. BRACHYTHERAPY, 2021, 20 (02) : 291 - 295
  • [37] A novel perineal shield for low-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy
    Weiner, Joseph P.
    Schwartz, David
    Safdieh, Joseph
    Polubarov, Alex
    Telly, Tejas
    Worth, Matthew
    Schreiber, David
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CONTEMPORARY BRACHYTHERAPY, 2015, 7 (03) : 197 - 202
  • [38] Low-dose-rate brachytherapy for low-grade prostate cancer
    Raabe, Nils Kristian
    Normann, Marius
    Lilleby, Wolfgang
    [J]. TIDSSKRIFT FOR DEN NORSKE LAEGEFORENING, 2015, 135 (06) : 548 - 552
  • [39] Low-Dose-Rate Brachytherapy for Prostate Cancer in Low Resource Settings
    Echevarria, M.
    Naghavi, A. O.
    Abuodeh, Y. A.
    Chevere, C. M.
    Yamoah, K.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2016, 96 (02): : E408 - E408
  • [40] Effect of the timing of hydrogel spacer placement on prostate and rectal dosimetry of low-dose-rate brachytherapy implants
    Butler, Wayne M.
    Kurko, Brian S.
    Scholl, Whitney J.
    Merrick, Gregory S.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CONTEMPORARY BRACHYTHERAPY, 2021, 13 (02) : 145 - 151