All-Arthroscopic Suprapectoral Versus Open Subpectoral Tenodesis of the Long Head of the Biceps Brachii Without the Use of Interference Screws

被引:50
|
作者
Green, Jamison M. [1 ]
Getelman, Mark H. [1 ]
Snyder, Stephen J. [1 ]
Burns, Joseph P. [1 ]
机构
[1] Southern Calif Orthoped Inst, Van Nuys, CA USA
关键词
FIXATION; TENDON; TENDINOPATHY; MANAGEMENT; TENOTOMY; LESIONS;
D O I
10.1016/j.arthro.2016.07.007
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Purpose: To compare patient-reported outcomes and healing rates after open subpectoral and all-arthroscopic suprapectoral biceps tenodesis without the use of interference screws in patients with more than 2 years of follow-up. Methods: Patients with at least 2 years of follow-up who underwent open subpectoral biceps tenodesis or all-arthroscopic suprapectoral biceps tenodesis without concomitant rotator cuff repair, labral repair, or Mumford procedure were considered for enrollment in the study. They were evaluated for visual analog scale (VAS), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, and satisfaction with function and biceps contour. Ultrasonography was performed to evaluate the integrity of the tenodesis site and measure biceps muscle diameters on each arm. Results: Forty-nine patients were eligible for our study and of these, 38 were able to participate. Twenty-three patients had open subpectoral biceps tenodesis and 15 received all-arthroscopic suprapectoral biceps tenodesis. The average follow-up time was 4.5 years (range 2-9.1 years). There were no significant differences in anterior shoulder pain VAS, ASES scores, or satisfaction rates. The average anterior shoulder VAS was 0.7 +/- 1.1 for the open group and 0.9 +/- 1.8 for the arthroscopic group (P = .74). The mean ASES score for the open group was 90.6 +/- 11.4 and 91.4 +/- 13.9 for the arthroscopic group (P = .69). All patients had an intact tenodesis site on ultrasonography and the ratio of operative to nonoperative biceps diameters was 100.2% +/- 12.8% for the open group and 99.1% +/- 10.8% for the arthroscopic group (P = .66). There were no infections and no brachial plexus injuries in either group. Conclusions: Open subpectoral biceps tenodesis and all-arthroscopic suprapectoral biceps tenodesis are both successful surgeries with consistently positive outcomes. Tenodesis can be performed in either location without interference screw fixation with durable, reliable results. Level of Evidence: Level III, retrospective comparative trial.
引用
收藏
页码:19 / 25
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Rotator cuff tear with concomitant long head of biceps tendon (LHBT) degeneration: what is the preferred choice? Open subpectoral versus arthroscopic intraarticular tenodesis
    Mardani-Kivi, Mohsen
    Keyhani, Sohrab
    Ebrahim-Zadeh, Mohammad-Hossein
    Hashemi-Motlagh, Keyvan
    Saheb-Ekhtiari, Khashayar
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDICS AND TRAUMATOLOGY, 2019, 20 (01)
  • [32] Arthroscopic Versus Open Comparison of Long Head of Biceps Tendon Visualization and Pathology in Patients Requiring Tenodesis
    Gilmer, Brian B.
    DeMers, Ariana M.
    Guerrero, Dolores
    Reid, John B., III
    Lubowitz, James H.
    Guttmann, Dan
    ARTHROSCOPY-THE JOURNAL OF ARTHROSCOPIC AND RELATED SURGERY, 2015, 31 (01): : 29 - 34
  • [33] Tenotomy Versus Tenodesis in the Management of Pathologic Lesions of the Tendon of the Long Head of the Biceps Brachii
    Frost, Andrew
    Zafar, Mohammed Saqib
    Maffulli, Nicola
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2009, 37 (04): : 828 - 833
  • [34] Proximal Biceps Tenodesis An Anatomic Study and Comparison of the Accuracy of Arthroscopic and Open Techniques Using Interference Screws
    Kovack, Thomas J.
    Idoine, John D., III
    Jacob, Paul B.
    ORTHOPAEDIC JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2014, 2 (02):
  • [35] Outcomes and Complications After Primary Arthroscopic Suprapectoral Versus Open Subpectoral Biceps Tenodesis for Superior Labral Anterior-Posterior Tears or Biceps Abnormalities: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Deng, Zi Jun
    Yin, Clark
    Cusano, Joseph
    Abdul-Rassoul, Hussein
    Curry, Emily J.
    Novikov, David
    Ma, Richard
    Li, Xinning
    ORTHOPAEDIC JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2020, 8 (08)
  • [36] Arthroscopic Soft Tissue Tenodesis Versus Bony Fixation Anchor Tenodesis of the Long Head of the Biceps Tendon
    Scheibel, Markus
    Schroeder, Ralf-Juergen
    Chen, Jianhai
    Bartschy, Martin
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2011, 39 (05): : 1046 - 1052
  • [37] Technical note: subpectoral tenodesis of the long head of the biceps tendon using a mini-open technique
    Hinz, Maximilian
    Pogorzelski, Jonas
    Imhoff, Andreas B.
    Siebenlist, Sebastian
    ARTHROSKOPIE, 2021, 34 (06) : 467 - 471
  • [38] Biceps tenodesis (long head): arthroscopic keyhole technique versus arthroscopic interference screw: a prospective comparative clinical and radiographic marker study
    Kany J.
    Guinand R.
    Croutzet P.
    Amaravathi R.
    Sekaran P.
    European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology, 2016, 26 (1) : 77 - 84
  • [39] Chronic rupture of the long head of the biceps tendon: comparison of 2-year results following primary versus revision open subpectoral biceps tenodesis
    Simon A. Euler
    Marilee P. Horan
    Michael B. Ellman
    Joshua A. Greenspoon
    Peter J. Millett
    Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, 2016, 136 : 657 - 663
  • [40] Arthroscopic proximal versus open subpectoral biceps tenodesis with arthroscopic repair of small- or medium-sized rotator cuff tears
    Yi, Young
    Lee, Jong-Myoung
    Kwon, Seok Hyun
    Kim, Jeong-Woo
    KNEE SURGERY SPORTS TRAUMATOLOGY ARTHROSCOPY, 2016, 24 (12) : 3772 - 3778