MRI comparison of quantitative left ventricular structure, function and measurement reproducibility in patient cohorts with a range of clinically distinct cardiac conditions

被引:7
|
作者
Gandy, Stephen J. [1 ,2 ]
Waugh, Shelley A. [1 ,2 ]
Nicholas, R. Stephen [1 ,2 ]
Rajendra, Narasimharaj [3 ]
Martin, Patricia [2 ]
Houston, J. Graeme [2 ]
机构
[1] Ninewells Hosp, Dept Med Phys, NHS Tayside, Dundee DD1 9SY, Scotland
[2] Ninewells Hosp, Dept Clin Radiol, NHS Tayside, Dundee DD1 9SY, Scotland
[3] Univ Dundee, Sch Med, Ninewells Hosp, Dundee DD1 9SY, Scotland
来源
关键词
magnetic resonance imaging; left ventricular ejection fraction; left ventricular mass; repeatability; patient volunteers;
D O I
10.1007/s10554-008-9293-5
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Aim Quantitative MRI assessments of cardiac structure and function are possible and potentially useful for longitudinal clinical monitoring. The aim of this study was to compare the magnitude and repeatability of left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (EF) and mass (LVM) measurements in patients with clinically distinct cardiac conditions. Materials and Methods Patients were recruited into four groups: (i) congestive heart failure (CHF), (ii) left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH), (iii) recent post myocardial infarct (PMI), and (iv) healthy normal volunteers (HNV). LV short-axis images were acquired on a 1.5T MRI scanner and analysed on a satellite workstation. EF and LVM (at ED) values were derived from myocardial segmentations, and intra- observer test-retest coefficients of repeatability (CoR) were determined for each cohort. Results The mean EF for the CHF patients (30.3%) was lower than for the other cohorts (LVH 72.7%, PMI 53.0%, HNV 67.0%; P < 0.0002). As expected, the mean LVM for the CHF patients (143 g) was greater than for the other cohorts (LVH 122 g, PMI 124 g, HNV 107 g), but only significant when compared to the HNV cohort (P = 0.004). The intra-observer CoR values for EF were 1.5% (LVH), 1.6% (HNV), 2.6% (PMI) and 5.5% (CHF), and 4.6 g (HNV), 6.7 g (PMI), 8.3 g (CHF) and 9.8 g (LVH) for LVM. Conclusion The EF, LVM and associated repeatability parameters are variable and dependent upon the clinical condition under investigation. It is important that reproducibility data for EF and LVM are acquired individually and specifically on a per-cohort basis if the parameters are to form reliable endpoints for longitudinal clinical follow-up assessments.
引用
收藏
页码:627 / 632
页数:6
相关论文
共 39 条
  • [1] MRI comparison of quantitative left ventricular structure, function and measurement reproducibility in patient cohorts with a range of clinically distinct cardiac conditions
    Stephen J. Gandy
    Shelley A. Waugh
    R. Stephen Nicholas
    Narasimharaj Rajendra
    Patricia Martin
    J. Graeme Houston
    The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging, 2008, 24 : 627 - 632
  • [2] Comparison of the reproducibility of quantitative cardiac left ventricular assessments in healthy volunteers using different MRI scanners: a multicenter simulation
    Gandy, Stephen J.
    Waugh, Shelley A.
    Nicholas, R. Stephen
    Simpson, Helen J.
    Milne, Wendy
    Houston, J. Graeme
    JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2008, 28 (02) : 359 - 365
  • [3] Quantitative Assessment of Left Ventricular Function and Myocardial Mass: A Comparison of Coronary CT Angiography with Cardiac MRI and Echocardiography
    Kara, Bedia
    Nayman, Alaaddin
    Guler, Ibrahim
    Gul, Enes Elvin
    Koplay, Mustafa
    Paksoy, Yahya
    POLISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2016, 81 : 95 - 102
  • [4] Comparison of techniques for the measurement of left ventricular function following cardiac transplantation
    Bellenger, NG
    Marcus, NJ
    Rajappan, K
    Yacoub, M
    Banner, NR
    Pennell, DJ
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE, 2002, 4 (02) : 255 - 263
  • [5] Cardiac CT for Measurement of Right Ventricular Volume and Function in Comparison with Cardiac MRI: A Meta-Analysis
    Kim, Jin Young
    Suh, Young Joo
    Han, Kyunghwa
    Kim, Young Jin
    Choi, Byoung Wook
    KOREAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2020, 21 (04) : 450 - 461
  • [6] Comparison of Rb-82 PET/CT and Cardiac MRI for Quantification of Left Ventricular Function
    Guldbrandsen, K. F.
    Wiinberg, N.
    Sajadieh, A.
    Host, N. B.
    Talleruphuus, U.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2018, 45 : S92 - S92
  • [7] Quantitative assessment of regional left ventricular function with cardiac MRI: Three-dimensional centersurface method
    Beohar, Nirat
    Flaherty, James D.
    Davidson, Charles J.
    Vidovich, Mladen I.
    Brodsky, Adam
    Lee, Daniel C.
    Wu, Edwin
    Bolson, Edward L.
    Bonow, Robert O.
    Sheehan, Florence H.
    CATHETERIZATION AND CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2007, 69 (05) : 721 - 728
  • [8] Assessment of the accuracy of IQ SPECT for the quantitative assessment of global left ventricular function in gated myocardial perfusion SPECT: Comparison with cardiac MRI
    Pascal, Pierre
    Dercle, Laurent
    Marachet, Marie-Agnes
    Giraudmaillet, Thomas
    Cognet, Thomas
    Mejean, Simon
    Bastie, Delphine
    Berry, Isabelle
    JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2014, 55
  • [9] Assessment of left ventricular volumes with cardiac MRI: comparison between two semiautomated quantitative software packages
    Messalli, G.
    Palumbo, A.
    Maffei, E.
    Martini, C.
    Seitun, S.
    Aldrovandi, A.
    Imbriaco, M.
    Salvatore, M.
    Weustink, A.
    Mollet, N.
    Cademartiri, F.
    RADIOLOGIA MEDICA, 2009, 114 (05): : 718 - 727
  • [10] Coupled deformable models with spatially varying features for quantitative assessment of left ventricular function from cardiac MRI
    Meetz, K
    von Berg, J
    Netsch, T
    Pekar, V
    Lobregt, S
    Truyen, R
    Siers, M
    Niessen, W
    Kaus, MR
    MEDICAL IMAGING 2003: IMAGE PROCESSING, PTS 1-3, 2003, 5032 : 1243 - 1253