Transrectal prostate biopsy and fiducial marker placement in a standard 1.5T magnetic resonance imaging scanner

被引:59
|
作者
Susil, RC
Menard, C
Krieger, A
Coleman, JA
Camphausen, K
Choyke, P
Fichtinger, G
Whitcomb, LL
Coleman, CN
Atalar, E
机构
[1] Johns Hopkins Univ, Sch Med, Dept Biomed Engn, Baltimore, MD 21205 USA
[2] Johns Hopkins Univ, Sch Med, Dept Radiol, Baltimore, MD 21205 USA
[3] Johns Hopkins Univ, Sch Med, Dept Comp Sci, Baltimore, MD 21205 USA
[4] Johns Hopkins Univ, Sch Med, Dept Mech Engn, Baltimore, MD 21205 USA
[5] NCI, Radiat Oncol Branch, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA
[6] NCI, Urol Oncol Branch, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA
[7] NIH, Dept Radiol, Ctr Clin, DHHS, Bethesda, MD USA
[8] Bilkent Univ, Dept Elect & Elect Engn, Ankara, Turkey
[9] Univ Toronto, Princess Margaret Hosp, Toronto, ON, Canada
来源
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY | 2006年 / 175卷 / 01期
关键词
magnetic resonance imaging; prostate; prostatic neoplasms; biopsy; radiology; interventional;
D O I
10.1016/S0022-5347(05)00065-0
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose: We investigated the accuracy and feasibility of a system that provides transrectal needle access to the prostate concurrent with 1.5 Tesla MRI which previously has not been possible. Materials and Methods: In 5 patients with previously diagnosed prostate cancer, MRI guided intraprostatic placement of gold fiducial markers (4 procedures) and/or prostate biopsy (3 procedures) was performed using local anesthesia. Results: Mean procedure duration was 76 minutes and all patients tolerated the intervention well. Procedure related adverse events included self-limited hematuria and hematochezia following 3 of 8 procedures (all resolved in less than 1 week). Mean needle placement accuracy was 1.9 mm for the fiducial marker placement studies and 1.8 mm for the biopsy procedures. Mean fiducial marker placement accuracy was 4.8 mm and the mean fiducial marker placement accuracy transverse to the needle direction was 2.6 mm. All patients who underwent the procedure were able to complete their course of radiotherapy without delay or complication. Conclusions: While studies of clinical usefulness are warranted, transrectal 1.5 T MRI guided prostate biopsy and fiducial marker placement is feasible using this system, providing new opportunities for image guided diagnostic and therapeutic prostate interventions.
引用
收藏
页码:113 / 120
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] 1.5T magnetic resonance imaging in evaluating fetal head and abdomen malformations: a preliminary study
    Duan, Jun
    Wang, Jin-Cai
    Li, Hui-Xian
    Guo, Ling
    Ma, Li-Ke
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSLATIONAL RESEARCH, 2021, 13 (08): : 9063 - 9069
  • [32] Managing Discordant Findings Between Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Transrectal Magnetic Resonance Imaging-directed Prostate Biopsy-The Key Role of Magnetic Resonance Imaging-directed Transperineal Biopsy
    Bajeot, Anne-Sophie
    Covin, Bertrand
    Meyrignac, Oliver
    Pericart, Sarah
    Aziza, Richard
    Portalez, Daniel
    Graff-Cailleaud, Pierre
    Ploussard, Guillaume
    Roumiguie, Mathieu
    Malavaud, Bernard
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY ONCOLOGY, 2022, 5 (03): : 296 - 303
  • [33] The effects of 1.5T magnetic resonance imaging on early murine in-vitro embryo development
    Chew, S
    Ahmadi, A
    Goh, PS
    Foong, LC
    JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2001, 13 (03) : 417 - 420
  • [34] Missing the Mark: Prostate Cancer Upgrading by Systematic Biopsy over Magnetic Resonance Imaging/Transrectal Ultrasound Fusion Biopsy
    Muthigi, Akhil
    George, Arvin K.
    Sidana, Abhinav
    Kongnyuy, Michael
    Simon, Richard
    Moreno, Vanessa
    Merino, Maria J.
    Choyke, Peter L.
    Turkbey, Baris
    Wood, Bradford J.
    Pinto, Peter A.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2017, 197 (02): : 327 - 333
  • [35] Comparison of systematic transrectal biopsy to transperineal magnetic resonance imaging/ultrasound-fusion biopsy for the diagnosis of prostate cancer
    Borkowetz, Angelika
    Platzek, Ivan
    Toma, Marieta
    Laniado, Michael
    Baretton, Gustavo
    Froehner, Michael
    Koch, Rainer
    Wirth, Manfred
    Zastrow, Stefan
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2015, 116 (06) : 873 - 879
  • [36] Optimal Number of Systematic Biopsy Cores Used in Magnetic Resonance Imaging/Transrectal Ultrasound Fusion Targeted Prostate Biopsy
    Teraoka, Shogo
    Honda, Masashi
    Shimizu, Ryutaro
    Nishikawa, Ryoma
    Kimura, Yusuke
    Yumioka, Tetsuya
    Iwamoto, Hideto
    Morizane, Shuichi
    Hikita, Katsuya
    Takenaka, Atsushi
    YONAGO ACTA MEDICA, 2021, 64 (03) : 260 - 268
  • [37] COST EFFECTIVENESS OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE/ULTRASOUND FUSION PROSTATE BIOPSY VS STANDARD OF CARE (TRANSRECTAL ULTRASOUND (TRUS)-GUIDED BIOPSY)
    Cobb, Kaitlan
    Kilchevsky, Amichai
    DiBianco, John Michael
    Su, Daniel
    Frye, Thomas
    Sabarwal, Vikram
    Turkbey, Baris
    Choyke, Peter
    Wood, Bradford
    Pinto, Peter
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2016, 195 (04): : E702 - E703
  • [38] Comparison of prostate cancer biopsy guided by magnetic resonance imaging, transrectal ultrasound and their combination scheme in biopsy Naive patients
    Wu, W.
    Huang, H.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2017, 24 : 102 - 102
  • [39] PROSTATE HEALTH INDEX FOR PROSTATE CANCER DETECTION IN PATIENT UNDERWENT MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING TRANSRECTAL ULTRASOUND FUSION PROSTATE BIOPSY
    Pan, Po-Hsun
    Lin, Tzu-Ping
    Fan, Yu-Hua
    Wei, Tzu-Chun
    Huang, Yi-Shen
    Lin, Chi-Cheh
    Huang, Eric Y. H.
    Chung, Hsiao-Jen
    Kuo, Junne-Yih
    Wu, Howard H. H.
    Lu, Shing-Hwa
    Chang, Yen-Hwa
    Lin, Alex T. L.
    Huang, William J. S.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2019, 201 (04): : E653 - E654
  • [40] Transperineal versus transrectal multi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging fusion targeted prostate biopsy
    Rabah, Danny
    Al-Taweel, Waleed
    Khan, Farrukh
    Arafa, Mostafa
    Mehmood, Shahbaz
    Mokhtar, Alaa
    Farhat, Karim
    SAUDI MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2021, 42 (06) : 649 - 654