Perceived bafflers to active commuting to school: reliability and validity of a scale

被引:29
|
作者
Molina-Garcia, Javier [1 ,2 ]
Queralt, Ana [2 ,3 ]
Estevan, Isaac [1 ,2 ]
Alvarez, Octavio [2 ,4 ]
Castillo, Isabel [2 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Valencia, Dept Didact Expres Mus Plast & Corporal, Valencia, Spain
[2] Univ Valencia, AFIPS Res Grp, Valencia, Spain
[3] Univ Valencia, Dept Enfermeria, Valencia, Spain
[4] Univ Valencia, Dept Psicol Social, Valencia, Spain
关键词
Active commuting; Adolescents; Environment; Neighbourhood; PHYSICAL-ACTIVITY; BUILT ENVIRONMENTS; ASSOCIATIONS; WALKABILITY; ADOLESCENTS; CHILDREN; FITNESS; WALKING; COMMUNITIES; INFORMATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.gaceta.2016.05.006
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: To examine the reliability and validity of a scale to measure perceived barriers to active commuting to school among Spanish young people. Method: The validity of the scale was assessed in a sample of 465 adolescents (14-18 years) using a confirmatory factor analysis and studying its association with self-reported active commuting to school. The reliability of the instrument was evaluated in a sub-sample that completed the scale twice separated by a one-week interval. Results: The results showed that the barriers scale had satisfactory fit indices, and two factors were determined. The first included environment- and safety-related items (alpha= 0.72), while the other concerned planning and psychosocial items (alpha = 0.64). Active commuting to school showed significant correlations with the total score of the barriers scale (rho = -0.27; p < 0.001), with the environmental/safety barriers (rho = -0.22; p < 0.001), as well as with the planning/psychosocial barriers (rho = -0.29; p < 0.001). Test-retest ICCs for the barriers ranged from 0.68 to 0.77. Conclusion: The developed scale has acceptable validity and good reliability to assess barriers to active commuting to school among Spanish young people. (C) 2016 SESPAS. Published by Elsevier Espana, S.L.U.
引用
收藏
页码:426 / 431
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Examining the Validity and Reliability of an Abridged Version of the Perceived Affect Utility Scale (PAUSe)
    Chow, Philip I.
    Berenbaum, Howard
    Wang, Chun
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT, 2017, 33 (05) : 365 - 376
  • [42] The Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support (MSPSS): Reliability and Validity of Russian Version
    Pushkarev, G. S.
    Zimet, G. D.
    Kuznetsov, V. A.
    Yaroslavskaya, E. I.
    CLINICAL GERONTOLOGIST, 2020, 43 (03) : 331 - 339
  • [43] Validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the self-perceived food literacy scale
    Selcuk, Kevser Tari
    Cevik, Celalettin
    Baydur, Hakan
    Meseri, Reci
    PROGRESS IN NUTRITION, 2020, 22 (02): : 671 - 677
  • [45] Validity and Reliability of the Hausa Version of Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support Index
    Mohammad, Ashiru Hamza
    Al Sadat, Nabilla
    Yim, Loh Siew
    Chinna, Karuthan
    IRANIAN RED CRESCENT MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2015, 17 (02)
  • [46] Living in school catchment neighborhoods: Perceived built environments and active commuting behaviors of children in China
    Sun, Guibo
    Han, Xili
    Sun, Shaohua
    Oreskovic, Nicolas
    JOURNAL OF TRANSPORT & HEALTH, 2018, 8 : 251 - 261
  • [47] Reliability and validity evidence for the middle school self-efficacy scale
    Fouad, NA
    Smith, PL
    Enochs, L
    MEASUREMENT AND EVALUATION IN COUNSELING AND DEVELOPMENT, 1997, 30 (01) : 17 - 31
  • [48] Reliability and validity of academic motivation scale for sports high school students'
    Haslofca, Fehime
    Korkmaz, Nimet Hasil
    ERPA INTERNATIONAL CONGRESSES ON EDUCATION 2015 (ERPA 2015), 2016, 26
  • [49] THE ADAPTATION OF SCHOOL REFUSAL ASSESSMENT SCALE INTO TURKISH: RELIABILITY AND VALIDITY STUDIES
    Secer, Ismail
    PAKISTAN JOURNAL OF STATISTICS, 2014, 30 (06): : 1197 - 1202
  • [50] A study of validity and reliability of Middle School Self-Efficacy Scale
    Yardimci, Figen
    Basbakkal, Zumrut
    ANADOLU PSIKIYATRI DERGISI-ANATOLIAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2010, 11 (04): : 321 - 326