Cross-species comparisons of the pharmacokinetics of ibudilast

被引:22
|
作者
Sanftner, L. M. [1 ]
Gibbons, J. A. [2 ]
Gross, M. I. [1 ]
Suzuki, B. M. [1 ]
Gaeta, F. C. A. [3 ]
Johnson, K. W. [1 ]
机构
[1] Avigen Inc, Res & Dev, Alameda, CA 94502 USA
[2] Jacqueline Gibbons Consulting, Piedmont, CA USA
[3] Gaeta Consulting, Mountain View, CA USA
关键词
Ibudilast; tolerability; pharmacokinetics; metabolism; animals; PHOSPHODIESTERASE INHIBITOR; DRUG-METABOLISM; RAT; LIVER; HEPATOCYTES; EXPRESSION; INDUCTION; CELLS; GLIA; CYTOCHROME-P-450;
D O I
10.3109/00498250903254340
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
1. To enable clinical development of ibudilast for new indications, its pharmacokinetics were characterized in mice, rats, rabbits, dogs, cynomolgus monkeys, and minipigs. Animal pharmacokinetics were compared with a separate study in healthy volunteers. 2. Following oral dosing, the dose-normalized area under the curve (AUC) (DN-AUC(24h)) in humans is 896 ((ng.h ml(-1))/(mg kg(-1))), and in animals ranges from 0.3 to 87. The variability among species cannot be explained by intrinsic clearance, which in intravenous dosing experiments shows only moderate interspecies variation (13-41 l h(-1) m(-2)). A portal vein rat pharmacokinetics model suggested that differences in first-pass gut clearance may explain some of the interspecies variation in oral bioavailability. Ibudilast shows auto-induction of metabolism in some animals, but not in humans. Plasma protein binding in humans and some animals is greater than or equal to 95%. The primary metabolite 6,7-dihyrdodiol-ibudilast is measurable and has been quantitated in plasma from animals and humans. Finally, biodistribution studies show that ibudilast distributes rapidly, extensively, and reversibly to the central nervous system.
引用
下载
收藏
页码:964 / 977
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Cross-species comparisons
    Sarah Seton-Rogers
    Nature Reviews Cancer, 2006, 6 : 580 - 580
  • [2] Oncogenomics - Cross-species comparisons
    Seton-Rogers, Sarah
    NATURE REVIEWS CANCER, 2006, 6 (08) : 580 - 580
  • [3] Cross-species comparisons of cancer signaling
    Graeber, TG
    Sawyers, CL
    NATURE GENETICS, 2005, 37 (01) : 7 - 8
  • [4] CROSS-SPECIES COMPARISONS OF AGGRESSION - COMMENT
    MAZUR, A
    AMERICAN SOCIOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1975, 40 (05) : 677 - 678
  • [5] CROSS-SPECIES COMPARISONS AND HUMAN HERITAGE
    BEACH, FA
    ARCHIVES OF SEXUAL BEHAVIOR, 1976, 5 (05) : 469 - 485
  • [6] Cross-species comparisons of cancer signaling
    Thomas G Graeber
    Charles L Sawyers
    Nature Genetics, 2005, 37 : 7 - 8
  • [7] Cross-species and interassay comparisons of phytoestrogen action
    Whitten, PL
    Patisaul, HB
    ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH PERSPECTIVES, 2001, 109 : 5 - 20
  • [8] Cross-species comparisons of host genetic associations with the microbiome
    Goodrich, Julia K.
    Davenport, Emily R.
    Waters, Jillian L.
    Clark, Andrew G.
    Ley, Ruth E.
    SCIENCE, 2016, 352 (6285) : 532 - 535
  • [9] Learning same and different relations: cross-species comparisons
    Gentner, Dedre
    Shao, Ruxue
    Simms, Nina
    Hespos, Susan
    CURRENT OPINION IN BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES, 2021, 37 : 84 - 89
  • [10] Disease insights through cross-species phenotype comparisons
    Melissa A. Haendel
    Nicole Vasilevsky
    Matthew Brush
    Harry S. Hochheiser
    Julius Jacobsen
    Anika Oellrich
    Christopher J. Mungall
    Nicole Washington
    Sebastian Köhler
    Suzanna E. Lewis
    Peter N. Robinson
    Damian Smedley
    Mammalian Genome, 2015, 26 : 548 - 555