Performance of rice straw as mono- and co-feedstock of Ulva spp. for thalassic biogas production

被引:3
|
作者
Marquez, Gian Powell B. [1 ,4 ]
Takeuchi, Hisae [1 ]
Montano, Marco Nemesio E. [3 ]
Hasegawa, Tatsuya [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Nagoya Univ, Inst Mat & Syst Sustainabil, Div Syst Res, Nagoya, Aichi 4648603, Japan
[2] Nagoya Univ, Grad Sch Engn, Dept Aerosp Engn, Nagoya, Aichi 4648603, Japan
[3] Univ Philippines, Inst Marine Sci, Quezon City 1101, Philippines
[4] Ritsumeikan Univ Osaka Ibaraki Campus, Coll Global Liberal Arts, Osaka 5678570, Japan
关键词
Energy; Biofuel; Green chemistry; Waste treatment; Green engineering; Biogas; Marine; Rice straw; Seaweed; Ulva; METHANE PRODUCTION; SACCHARINA-LATISSIMA; BIOMASS; SEAWEED; PRETREATMENT; DEGRADATION; FERMENTATION; HYDROLYSIS; DIGESTION; WASTES;
D O I
10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e05036
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
The seasonal availability of Ulva spp. (U) poses a problem for the continuous operation of thalassic (TH) biogas digesters. Hence, rice straw (RS) was tested as an alternative substrate because of its abundance in Asian countries. The anaerobic monodigestion (AMD) of RS was performed under freshwater (FW) and TH conditions to investigate the TH biogas production performance using terrestrial biomass. Biological hydrolysis (BH-P) and 3% NaOH (NaOH-P) pretreatments were employed to minimize the limitation of biomass hydrolysis in the methane fermentation process. The BH-P [FW = 62.2 +/- 30.9 mLCH(4) g(-1)VS (volatile solids); TH = 75.8 +/- 5.7 mLCH(4) g(-1)VS] of RS led to higher actual methane yield (AMY) than NaOH-P (FW = 15.8 +/- 22.8 mLCH(4) g(-1)VS; TH = 21.4 +/- 4.2 mLCH(4) g(-1)VS) under both conditions (P = 0.008), while AMY of FW BH-P was comparable (P = 0.182) to TH BH-P. Thus, TH and BH-P was applied to the anaerobic co-digestion (ACD) of U and RS of varying mixture ratios. All ACD set-ups resulted in higher AMY (25U:75RS = 107.6 +/- 7.9 mLCH(4) g(-1)VS, 50U:50RS = 130.3 +/- 10.3 mLCH(4) g(-1)VS, 75U:25RS = 121.7 +/- 2.7 mLCH(4) g(-1)VS) compared with 100% RS (75.8 +/- 5.7 mLCH(4) g(-1)VS) or 100% U (94.8 +/- 6.8 mLCH(4) g(-1)VS) alone. While the AMY of 50U:50RS was comparable to 75U:25RS (P = 0.181), it is significantly higher (P = 0.003) than its estimated methane yield (EMY; 85.3 mLCH(4) g(-1)VS), suggesting a synergistic effect on ACD of U and RS under 50:50 ratio. The results show that RS can be used as an alternative mono-feedstock for TH biogas production, and a high AMY can be obtained when RS is used as co-feedstock with U.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Co-densification of rice straw and cow dung in different food-to-microorganism ratios for biogas production
    Singh, Prakash
    Dogra, Pallavi
    Tg, Induchoodan
    Kalamdhad, Ajay S.
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2024, 14 (01):
  • [22] Bio-pretreatment Enhances Biogas Production from Co-digestion of Rice Straw and Pig Manure
    Nam Sy Tran
    Thao Van Huynh
    Ngan Vo Chau Nguyen
    Ingvorsen, Kjeld
    INTERNATIONAL ENERGY JOURNAL, 2021, 21 (04): : 457 - 466
  • [23] Effect of initial pH on anaerobic co-digestion of Salvinia molesta and rice straw for biogas production and kinetics
    Syaichurrozi, Iqbal
    Suhirman, Suhirman
    Hidayat, Topik
    BIOCATALYSIS AND AGRICULTURAL BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2018, 16 : 594 - 603
  • [24] Evaluation of Biogas Performance and Process Stability from Food, Kitchen, and Fruit/Vegetable Waste by Mono-, Co-, and Tridigestion
    Li, Pengcheng
    Liu, Ziyi
    Zhao, Mingxing
    Dai, Xiaohu
    Ruan, Wenquan
    ENERGY & FUELS, 2020, 34 (10) : 12734 - 12742
  • [25] Anaerobic Co-digestion of Rice Straw and Soybean Straw to Increase Biogas Production by Pretreatment with Trichoderma reesei RUT C30
    Deng, Yuanfang
    Dai, Benlin
    Xu, Jiaxing
    Liu, Xiaoyan
    Xu, Jiming
    ENVIRONMENTAL PROGRESS & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY, 2018, 37 (03) : 1050 - 1057
  • [26] Effects of organic loading rates on microbial communities and biogas production from water hyacinth: a case of mono- and co-digestion
    Nkuna, Rosina
    Roopnarain, Ashira
    Adeleke, Rasheed
    JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL TECHNOLOGY AND BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2019, 94 (04) : 1294 - 1304
  • [27] Rice straw anaerobic co-digestion: Comparing various pre-treatment techniques to enhance biogas production
    Mothe, Sagarika
    Jugal, Sukesh Muramreddy
    Rao, P. Venkateswara
    Sridhar, Pilli
    BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY REPORTS, 2024, 25
  • [28] Digestate recirculation through co-digestion with rice straw: Towards high biogas production and efficient waste recycling
    Ai, Ping
    Chen, Mengdi
    Ran, Yi
    Jin, Keda
    Peng, Jingjing
    Abomohra, Abd El-Fatah
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2020, 263
  • [29] Enhanced biogas production potential analysis of rice straw: Biomass characterization, kinetics and anaerobic co-digestion investigations
    Pal, Dan Bahadur
    Tiwari, Amit Kumar
    Mohammad, Akbar
    Prasad, Nirupama
    Srivastava, Neha
    Srivastava, K. R.
    Singh, Rajeev
    Yoon, Taeho
    Syed, Asad
    Bahkali, Ali H.
    Gupta, Vijai Kumar
    BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2022, 358
  • [30] Keratinase Production by Endophytic Penicillium spp. Morsy1 Under Solid-State Fermentation Using Rice Straw
    El-Gendy, Mervat Morsy A.
    APPLIED BIOCHEMISTRY AND BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2010, 162 (03) : 780 - 794