共 50 条
Improvement of appropriate pharmacological prophylaxis in hospitalised cancer patients with a multiscreen e-alert system: a single-centre experience
被引:6
|作者:
Figueroa, R.
[1
]
Alfonso, A.
[1
]
Lopez-Picazo, J.
[2
]
Gil-Bazo, I.
[2
]
Garcia-Mouriz, A.
[3
]
Hermida, J.
[4
,5
]
Paramo, J. A.
[1
,5
]
Lecumberri, R.
[1
,5
]
机构:
[1] Univ Clin Navarra, Hematol Serv, Ave Pio XII 36, Pamplona 31008, Spain
[2] Univ Clin Navarra, Dept Oncol, Pamplona, Spain
[3] Univ Clin Navarra, Informat Serv, Pamplona, Spain
[4] Univ Navarra, Ctr Appl Med Res, Pamplona, Spain
[5] Inst Salud Carlos III, Ctr Invest Biomed Red CIBER CV, Madrid, Spain
来源:
关键词:
Cancer;
Electronic alerts;
Low molecular weight heparin;
Prophylaxis;
Venous thromboembolism;
PREVENT VENOUS THROMBOEMBOLISM;
CLINICAL-PRACTICE;
ELECTRONIC ALERTS;
THROMBOPROPHYLAXIS;
RISK;
D O I:
10.1007/s12094-018-1986-1
中图分类号:
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号:
100214 ;
摘要:
PurposeThromboprophylaxis use among medical inpatients, including cancer patients, is suboptimal. We aimed to evaluate the impact of a novel multiscreen version (v2.0) of an e-alert system for VTE prevention in hospitalised cancer medical patients compared to the original software.MethodsProspective study including 989 consecutive adult cancer patients with high-risk of VTE. Patients were followed-up 30days post-discharge. Two periods were defined, according to the operative software.ResultsE-alert v2.0 was associated with an increase in the use of LMWH prophylaxis (65.5% vs. 72.0%); risk difference (95% CI) 0.064 (0.0043-0.12). Only 16% of patients in whom LMWH prophylaxis was not prescribed lacked a contraindication. No significant differences in the rates of VTE (2.9% vs. 3.2%) and major bleeding (2.7% vs. 4.0%) were observed.ConclusionsE-alert v2.0 further increased the use of appropriate thromboprophylaxis in hospitalised cancer patients, although was not associated with a reduction in VTE incidence.
引用
收藏
页码:805 / 809
页数:5
相关论文