Comparison of three methods of interpolating soil moisture in Oklahoma

被引:17
|
作者
Yuan, Shanshui [1 ]
Quiring, Steven M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Texas A&M Univ, Dept Geog, Climate Sci Lab, 814 O&M Bldg, College Stn, TX 77843 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
soil moisture; interpolation; ROI; sensitivity; regional scale; SOUTHERN GREAT-PLAINS; SGP97 HYDROLOGY EXPERIMENT; UNITED-STATES; VARIABILITY; MODEL; DROUGHT; SPACE; NETWORKS; SCALE; PRECIPITATION;
D O I
10.1002/joc.4754
中图分类号
P4 [大气科学(气象学)];
学科分类号
0706 ; 070601 ;
摘要
Interpolating soil moisture at the regional scale (10(4)-10(7) km(2)) is challenging because in situ observations tend to be sparse, and hydrometeorological conditions and soil characteristics have significant spatial variability. This study is the first to apply the reduced optimal interpolation (ROI) method to soil moisture. The ROI method uses both in situ and variable infiltration capacity (VIC) simulated-soil moisture to generate interpolated soil moisture surfaces in Oklahoma. The ROI method is based on an empirical orthogonal function (EOF) analysis that identifies the leading spatial modes of soil moisture variation based on the model simulation and then applies these EOFs using the temporal variations in the observed soil moisture. The interpolated soil moisture surfaces generated using ROI are compared with Cokriging, which also uses VIC simulations as a secondary input, and the inverse distance weighting (IDW) approach. The accuracy of all three interpolation methods are evaluated using soil moisture measurements from 65 stations. The ROI method is significantly more accurate than IDW and it also outperforms Cokriging. We demonstrate that ROI can be used to accurately depict the spatial patterns of soil moisture at the local and regional level.
引用
收藏
页码:987 / 997
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Comparison Study on Color Filter Array Interpolating Methods
    Li, Xuan
    Song, Zhanjie
    Hou, Zhengxin
    Wang, Chengyou
    ICIEA: 2009 4TH IEEE CONFERENCE ON INDUSTRIAL ELECTRONICS AND APPLICATIONS, VOLS 1-6, 2009, : 2086 - 2090
  • [32] Comparison of three dielectric moisture sensors for measurement of water in saline sandy soil
    Inoue, M.
    Ahmed, B. A. Ould
    Saito, T.
    Irshad, M.
    Uzoma, K. C.
    SOIL USE AND MANAGEMENT, 2008, 24 (02) : 156 - 162
  • [33] Comparison Quality of Interpolation Methods to Estimate Spatial Distribution of Soil Moisture Content
    Tuncay, Tulay
    COMMUNICATIONS IN SOIL SCIENCE AND PLANT ANALYSIS, 2021, 52 (04) : 353 - 374
  • [34] Comparison of spatial interpolation methods for soil moisture and its application for monitoring drought
    Chen, Hui
    Fan, Li
    Wu, Wei
    Liu, Hong-Bin
    ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING AND ASSESSMENT, 2017, 189 (10)
  • [35] Comparison of spatial interpolation methods for soil moisture and its application for monitoring drought
    Hui Chen
    Li Fan
    Wei Wu
    Hong-Bin Liu
    Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 2017, 189
  • [36] Comparison of interpolation methods for soil moisture prediction on China's Loess Plateau
    Xie, Baoni
    Jia, Xiaoxu
    Qin, Zhanfei
    Zhao, Chunlei
    Shao, Ming'an
    VADOSE ZONE JOURNAL, 2020, 19 (01)
  • [37] Retrieving surface soil moisture over a wheat field:: Comparison of different methods
    Pardé, M
    Wigneron, JP
    Chanzy, A
    Waldteufel, P
    Kerr, Y
    Huet, S
    REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT, 2003, 87 (2-3) : 334 - 344
  • [38] Comparison of three kriging methods for making soil remediation decisions
    Buxton, BE
    Wells, DE
    DiLuise, G
    GEOSTATISTICS WOLLONGONG '96, VOLS 1 AND 2, 1997, 8 (1-2): : 984 - 995
  • [39] Comparison of three soil management methods in the Tokaj wine region
    Judit, Goeblyoes
    Gabor, Zanathy
    Adam, Donko
    Tamas, Varga
    Gyoergy, Bisztray
    MITTEILUNGEN KLOSTERNEUBURG, 2011, 61 (04): : 187 - 195
  • [40] METHODS OF MEASURING SOIL MOISTURE TENSION
    RICHARDS, LA
    SOIL SCIENCE, 1949, 68 (01) : 95 - 112