共 50 条
Evaluation of an individual-donation nucleic acid amplification testing algorithm for detecting hepatitis B virus infection in Chinese blood donors
被引:30
|作者:
Gou, Hongna
[1
,2
]
Pan, Yang
[3
]
Ge, Hongwei
[4
]
Zheng, Yourong
[5
]
Wu, Yaling
[6
]
Zeng, Jinfeng
[7
]
Yang, Zhongsi
[8
]
Pan, Tong
[9
]
Cun, Wei
[10
]
Zhou, Guoping
[11
]
Fang, Gen
[12
]
Zhang, Jiahong
[13
]
Zhang, Kuo
[1
]
Zhang, Rui
[1
]
Sun, Yu
[1
]
Xie, Jiehong
[1
]
Li, Jinming
[1
]
Wang, Lunan
[1
]
机构:
[1] Chinese Acad Med Sci, Natl Ctr Clin Labs, Beijing Hosp, Beijing 100730, Peoples R China
[2] Chinese Acad Med Sci, Grad Sch, Peking Union Med Coll, Beijing 100730, Peoples R China
[3] Beijing Ctr Dis Prevent & Control CDC, Inst Infect Dis & Endem Dis Control, Beijing, Peoples R China
[4] Beijing Blood Ctr, Beijing, Peoples R China
[5] Guangzhou Blood Ctr, Guangzhou, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[6] Zhejiang Blood Ctr, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
[7] Shenzhen Blood Ctr, Shenzhen, Peoples R China
[8] Qingdao Blood Ctr, Qingdao, Peoples R China
[9] Tianjin Blood Ctr, Tianjin, Peoples R China
[10] Kunming Blood Ctr, Kunming, Peoples R China
[11] Shanghai Blood Ctr, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[12] Neimenggu Blood Ctr, Neimenggu, Peoples R China
[13] Tongzhou Blood Ctr, Beijing, Peoples R China
来源:
关键词:
OCCULT HBV INFECTION;
TRANSMISSION RISK;
WINDOW PERIOD;
TEST OPTIONS;
EPIDEMIOLOGY;
SENSITIVITY;
COMPONENTS;
ASSAYS;
D O I:
10.1111/trf.13135
中图分类号:
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号:
1002 ;
100201 ;
摘要:
BACKGROUND: This multicenter study was performed to evaluate the efficiency of a multiplex individual-donation nucleic acid amplification technology (ID-NAT) and discriminatory testing algorithm for detecting hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection in Chinese blood donors. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: A total of 1,205,796 hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg)nonreactive donations from 10 blood centers were tested by ID-NATusing the Ultrio assay. Multiplex Ultrio-reactive donations were tested in the discriminatory tests as well as in quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) and in supplemental electrochemiluminescence immunoassays for HBsAg, hepatitis B surface antibody (anti-HBs), hepatitis B e antigen, and antibody to hepatitis B core antigen (anti-HBc). Meanwhile, a control group of 4317 Ultrio-nonreactive donations was tested for anti-HBc and anti-HBs. RESULTS: Of all donations, 2033 (0.17%) were reactive in the multiplex Ultrio assay. Among 1776 further tested samples, 548 (30.9%) were HBV discriminatory assay (dHBV)-reactive, while 1214 (68.4%) were nonreactive. Of 472 Ultrio+ and dHBV+ samples 86.2% were qPCR positive compared to 15.0% in 1046 Ultrio+ and dHBVsamples. The proportion of anti-HBc+ and anti-HBs( potentially infectious) donations was higher in 409 Ultrio+ and dHBV+ than in 1028 Ultrio+ and dHBVsamples (51.3% vs. 31.1%, p < 0.001). The yield rate of Ultrio+, dHBV+, and qPCR+ donations was estimated at 1 in 2500, but at 1 in 1100 when all supplemental tests were taken into account assuming that 44% of detected donations by Ultrio were false reactive. CONCLUSIONS: A quarter of HBsAg-negative Ultrio+ and dHBV-donations in China are likely given by potentially infectious low-viral-load occult carriers. Although this has no implication for blood safety, the testing algorithm needs to be redesigned to more efficiently discriminate between true and false NATreactivity.
引用
收藏
页码:2272 / 2281
页数:10
相关论文