The comparison of acellular dermal matrix allografts with free gingival grafts in the augmentation of pen-implant attached mucosa: a randomised controlled trial

被引:1
|
作者
Basegmez, Cansu [1 ]
Karabuda, Zihni Cuneyt [2 ]
Demirel, Korkud [3 ]
Yalcin, Serdar [4 ]
机构
[1] Istanbul Univ, Fac Dent, Dept Oral Implantol, TR-34390 Istanbul, Turkey
[2] Istanbul Univ, Dept Oral Implantol, TR-34390 Istanbul, Turkey
[3] Istanbul Univ, Dept Periodontol, TR-34390 Istanbul, Turkey
[4] Istanbul Univ, Dept Oral lmplantol, TR-34390 Istanbul, Turkey
关键词
acellular dermal matrix; free gingival graft; peri-implant keratinised mucosa; KERATINIZED MUCOSA; PARAMETERS; TISSUE;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Purpose: The purpose of this randomised controlled trial is to compare the efficacy of two techniques for enhancing pen-implant keratinised mucosa: acellular dermal matrix allograft versus free gingival grafts. Materials and methods: Thirty-six patients having implant sites with less than 1.5 mm of keratinised mucosa width were randomly assigned to two groups. Thirty-six implants placed in 18 patients received acellular dermal matrix allografts (ADM group), while 36 implants placed in 18 individuals received free gingival grafts (FGG group). Plaque index (PI), gingival index (GI), probing depth (PD) and the width of attached mucosa (WAM) were measured at baseline and at 1, 3 and 6 months following surgery. Results: WAM in the FGG group was significantly greater than the ADM group at 3 (P = 0.026) and 6 months (P < 0.001). In the EGG group, final gain of WAM was greater (1.58 mm in ADM group, 2.57 mm in FGG group) (P < 0.001) and postoperative relapse was smaller (2.68 mm in the ADM group, 1.73 mm in the FGG group) (P < 0.001). PI and GI scores were greater in the ADM group at 6 months (P = 0.016 and P = 0.61, respectively). The FGG group demonstrated a greater PD value at 3 months (P < 0.001), however there was no significant difference between the groups at 6 months (P = 0.317). Conclusions: Although ADM allografts are capable of increasing the width of pen-implant keratinised mucosa, FGGs seem to be more effective. ADM allografts may be the application of choice at implant sites in need of major grafts and in patients where a donor site should be avoided for medical or psychological reasons.
引用
收藏
页码:145 / 152
页数:8
相关论文
共 47 条
  • [21] Comparison of Freeze-Dried and Solvent-Dehydrated Acellular Dermal Matrix for Root Coverage: A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Wang, Hom-Lay
    del Amo, Fernando Suarez-Lopez
    Layher, Mary
    Eber, Robert
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PERIODONTICS & RESTORATIVE DENTISTRY, 2015, 35 (06) : 811 - 817
  • [22] Erratum to: The Multi Centre Canadian Acellular Dermal Matrix Trial (MCCAT): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial in implant-based breast reconstruction
    Toni Zhong
    Claire Temple-Oberle
    Stefan O. P. Hofer
    Brett Beber
    John Semple
    Mitchell Brown
    Sheina Macadam
    Peter Lennox
    Tony Panzarella
    Colleen McCarthy
    Nancy Baxter
    Trials, 17
  • [23] Comparison of Xenogeneic Collagen Matrix vs. Free Gingival Grafts to Increase the Zone of Keratinized Mucosa Around Functioning Implants
    Vellis, Jimmy
    Kutkut, Ahmad
    Al-Sabbagh, Mohanad
    IMPLANT DENTISTRY, 2019, 28 (01) : 20 - 27
  • [24] Randomized, Controlled Clinical Trial to Evaluate a Xenogeneic Collagen Matrix as an Alternative to Free Gingival Grafting for Oral Soft Tissue Augmentation
    McGuire, Michael K.
    Scheyer, E. Todd
    JOURNAL OF PERIODONTOLOGY, 2014, 85 (10) : 1333 - 1341
  • [25] Do repeated changes of abutments have any influence on the stability of pen-implant tissues? Four-month post-loading preliminary results from a multicentre randomised controlled trial
    Luongo, Giuseppe
    Bressan, Eriberto
    Gabriella, Maria
    d'Avenia, Ferdinando
    Neumann, Konrad
    Sbricoli, Luca
    Esposito, Marco
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ORAL IMPLANTOLOGY, 2015, 8 (02) : 129 - 140
  • [26] The Multi Centre Canadian Acellular Dermal Matrix Trial (MCCAT): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial in implant-based breast reconstruction (vol 14, 356, 2013)
    Zhong, Toni
    Temple-Oberle, Claire
    Hofer, Stefan O. P.
    Beber, Brett
    Semple, John
    Brown, Mitchell
    Macadam, Sheina
    Lennox, Peter
    Panzarella, Tony
    McCarthy, Colleen
    Baxter, Nancy
    TRIALS, 2016, 17
  • [27] Efficacy of a collagen matrix for soft tissue augmentation after implant placement compared to connective tissue grafts: A multicenter, noninferiority, randomized controlled trial
    Hammerle, Christoph H. F.
    Jepsen, Karin
    Sailer, Irena
    Strasding, Malin
    Zeltner, Marco
    Cordaro, Luca
    Mirisola di Torresanto, Vincenzo
    Schwarz, Frank
    Zuhr, Otto
    Akakpo, Dodji
    Bonnet, Franck
    Sanz-Martin, Ignacio
    Thoma, Daniel S.
    Strauss, Franz J.
    Sanz, Mariano
    CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2023, 34 (09) : 999 - 1013
  • [28] Efficiency of platelet-rich plasma on acellular dermal matrix application with coronally advanced flap in the treatment of multiple adjacent gingival recessions: A randomized controlled clinical trial
    Cetiner, Deniz
    Kalabay, Pelin Gokalp
    Ozdemir, Burcu
    Cankaya, Zeynep Turgut
    JOURNAL OF DENTAL SCIENCES, 2018, 13 (03) : 198 - 206
  • [29] Comparison between a xenogeneic dermal matrix and connective tissue graft for the treatment of multiple adjacent gingival recessions: a randomized controlled clinical trial
    Meza-Mauricio, Jonathan
    Cortez-Gianezzi, Jonatas
    Duarte, Poliana Mendes
    Tavelli, Lorenzo
    Rasperini, Giulio
    de Faveri, Marcelo
    CLINICAL ORAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2021, 25 (12) : 6919 - 6929
  • [30] Comparison between a xenogeneic dermal matrix and connective tissue graft for the treatment of multiple adjacent gingival recessions: a randomized controlled clinical trial
    Jonathan Meza-Mauricio
    Jônatas Cortez-Gianezzi
    Poliana Mendes Duarte
    Lorenzo Tavelli
    Giulio Rasperini
    Marcelo de Faveri
    Clinical Oral Investigations, 2021, 25 : 6919 - 6929