The comparison of acellular dermal matrix allografts with free gingival grafts in the augmentation of pen-implant attached mucosa: a randomised controlled trial

被引:1
|
作者
Basegmez, Cansu [1 ]
Karabuda, Zihni Cuneyt [2 ]
Demirel, Korkud [3 ]
Yalcin, Serdar [4 ]
机构
[1] Istanbul Univ, Fac Dent, Dept Oral Implantol, TR-34390 Istanbul, Turkey
[2] Istanbul Univ, Dept Oral Implantol, TR-34390 Istanbul, Turkey
[3] Istanbul Univ, Dept Periodontol, TR-34390 Istanbul, Turkey
[4] Istanbul Univ, Dept Oral lmplantol, TR-34390 Istanbul, Turkey
关键词
acellular dermal matrix; free gingival graft; peri-implant keratinised mucosa; KERATINIZED MUCOSA; PARAMETERS; TISSUE;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Purpose: The purpose of this randomised controlled trial is to compare the efficacy of two techniques for enhancing pen-implant keratinised mucosa: acellular dermal matrix allograft versus free gingival grafts. Materials and methods: Thirty-six patients having implant sites with less than 1.5 mm of keratinised mucosa width were randomly assigned to two groups. Thirty-six implants placed in 18 patients received acellular dermal matrix allografts (ADM group), while 36 implants placed in 18 individuals received free gingival grafts (FGG group). Plaque index (PI), gingival index (GI), probing depth (PD) and the width of attached mucosa (WAM) were measured at baseline and at 1, 3 and 6 months following surgery. Results: WAM in the FGG group was significantly greater than the ADM group at 3 (P = 0.026) and 6 months (P < 0.001). In the EGG group, final gain of WAM was greater (1.58 mm in ADM group, 2.57 mm in FGG group) (P < 0.001) and postoperative relapse was smaller (2.68 mm in the ADM group, 1.73 mm in the FGG group) (P < 0.001). PI and GI scores were greater in the ADM group at 6 months (P = 0.016 and P = 0.61, respectively). The FGG group demonstrated a greater PD value at 3 months (P < 0.001), however there was no significant difference between the groups at 6 months (P = 0.317). Conclusions: Although ADM allografts are capable of increasing the width of pen-implant keratinised mucosa, FGGs seem to be more effective. ADM allografts may be the application of choice at implant sites in need of major grafts and in patients where a donor site should be avoided for medical or psychological reasons.
引用
收藏
页码:145 / 152
页数:8
相关论文
共 47 条
  • [1] Comparison of free gingival grafts and acellular dermal grafts to increase the width of attached gingiva.
    Firatli, E
    Uygur, C
    Yücekal, B
    Özel, E
    JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 2000, 79 : 487 - 487
  • [2] Alternative pen-implant gingival augmentation with a xenogeneic collagen matrix: A case report
    Schmitt, Christian Martin
    Doering, Hendrik
    Tudor, Christian
    Kiener, Katrin
    Eitner, Stefan
    Schlegel, Karl Andreas
    IMPLANTOLOGIE, 2013, 21 (02): : 191 - 198
  • [3] The comparison of two techniques to increase the amount of peri-implant attached mucosa: free gingival grafts versus vestibuloplasty. One-year results from a randomised controlled trial
    Basegmez, Cansu
    Ersanli, Selim
    Demirel, Korkud
    Bolukbasi, Nilufer
    Yalcin, Serdar
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ORAL IMPLANTOLOGY, 2012, 5 (02) : 139 - 145
  • [4] Free gingival graft and acellular dermal matrix for gingival augmentation: a 15-year clinical study
    Cevallos, Cecilia Amparo Reyes
    de Resende, Daniel Romeu Benchimol
    Damante, Carla Andreotti
    Sant'Ana, Adriana Campos Passanezi
    de Rezende, Maria Lucia Rubo
    Greghi, Sebastiao Luiz Aguiar
    Zangrando, Mariana Schutzer Ragghianti
    CLINICAL ORAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2020, 24 (03) : 1197 - 1203
  • [5] Free gingival graft and acellular dermal matrix for gingival augmentation: a 15-year clinical study
    Cecilia Amparo Reyes Cevallos
    Daniel Romeu Benchimol de Resende
    Carla Andreotti Damante
    Adriana Campos Passanezi Sant’Ana
    Maria Lúcia Rubo de Rezende
    Sebastião Luiz Aguiar Greghi
    Mariana Schutzer Ragghianti Zangrando
    Clinical Oral Investigations, 2020, 24 : 1197 - 1203
  • [6] Clinical evaluation of xenogeneic collagen matrix versus free gingival grafts for keratinized mucosa augmentation around dental implants: A randomized controlled clinical trial
    Huang, Jia-Ping
    Liu, Jia-Mei
    Wu, Yan-Min
    Dai, Anna
    Hu, Hua-Jiao
    He, Fu-Ming
    Chen, Qian-Ming
    Li, Xiao-Jun
    Sun, Ping
    Ding, Pei-Hui
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PERIODONTOLOGY, 2021, 48 (10) : 1293 - 1301
  • [7] Augmentation of Peri-implant Keratinized Mucosa Using a Combination of Free Gingival Graft Strip with Xenogeneic Collagen Matrix or Free Gingival Graft Alone: A Randomized Controlled Study
    Farooqui, Arifa Areej
    Kumar, A. B. Tarun
    Shah, Rucha
    Triveni, G.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL IMPLANTS, 2023, 38 (04) : 709 - 716
  • [8] Fetal bovine acellular dermal matrix for the closure of diabetic foot ulcers: a prospective randomised controlled trial
    Lantis, John C.
    Snyder, Robert
    Reyzelman, Alexander M.
    Van Gils, Carl C.
    Sigal, Felix
    Vayser, Dean
    Caporusso, Joseph M.
    Cazze, Shawn
    Lavery, Lawrence A.
    JOURNAL OF WOUND CARE, 2021, 30 (07) : S18 - S27
  • [9] Clinical and histological evaluation of the use of acellular dermal matrix (ADM) membrane in peri-implant vertical soft tissue augmentation: A controlled clinical trial
    Zang, Jing
    Su, Li
    Luan, Qingxian
    Liu, Guojing
    Li, Shiyi
    Yu, Xiaoqian
    CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2022, 33 (06) : 586 - 597
  • [10] Acellular dermal matrix allograft versus free gingival graft: a histological evaluation and split-mouth randomized clinical trial
    Benchimol de Resende, Daniel Romeu
    Aguiar Greghi, Sebastiao Luiz
    Siqueira, Aline Franco
    Magalhaes Benfatti, Cesar Augusto
    Damante, Carla Andreotti
    Ragghianti Zangrando, Mariana Schutzer
    CLINICAL ORAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2019, 23 (02) : 539 - 550