Sample Size Considerations for One-to-One Animal Transmission Studies of the Influenza A Viruses

被引:32
|
作者
Nishiura, Hiroshi [1 ,2 ]
Yen, Hui-Ling [3 ]
Cowling, Benjamin J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hong Kong, Sch Publ Hlth, Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[2] Japan Sci & Technol Agcy, PRESTO, Saitama, Japan
[3] Univ Hong Kong, Li Ka Shing Fac Med, Sch Publ Hlth, Influenza Res Ctr, Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
来源
PLOS ONE | 2013年 / 8卷 / 01期
基金
日本科学技术振兴机构;
关键词
PANDEMIC INFLUENZA; FERRETS; PATHOGENESIS; MODEL; TRIALS; COHORT; HA;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0055358
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Background: Animal transmission studies can provide important insights into host, viral and environmental factors affecting transmission of viruses including influenza A. The basic unit of analysis in typical animal transmission experiments is the presence or absence of transmission from an infectious animal to a susceptible animal. In studies comparing two groups (e.g. two host genetic variants, two virus strains, or two arrangements of animal cages), differences between groups are evaluated by comparing the proportion of pairs with successful transmission in each group. The present study aimed to discuss the significance and power to estimate transmissibility and identify differences in the transmissibility based on one-to- one trials. The analyses are illustrated on transmission studies of influenza A viruses in the ferret model. Methodology/Principal Findings: Employing the stochastic general epidemic model, the basic reproduction number, R-0, is derived from the final state of an epidemic and is related to the probability of successful transmission during each one-to-one trial. In studies to estimate transmissibility, we show that 3 pairs of infectious/susceptible animals cannot demonstrate a significantly higher transmissibility than R-0 = 1, even if infection occurs in all three pairs. In comparisons between two groups, at least 4 pairs of infectious/susceptible animals are required in each group to ensure high power to identify significant differences in transmissibility between the groups. Conclusions: These results inform the appropriate sample sizes for animal transmission experiments, while relating the observed proportion of infected pairs to R-0, an interpretable epidemiological measure of transmissibility. In addition to the hypothesis testing results, the wide confidence intervals of R-0 with small sample sizes also imply that the objective demonstration of difference or similarity should rest on firmly calculated sample size.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] One-to-one versus group setting for conducting computer-assisted TTO studies: findings from pilot studies in England and the Netherlands
    Koonal K. Shah
    Andrew Lloyd
    Mark Oppe
    Nancy J. Devlin
    The European Journal of Health Economics, 2013, 14 : 65 - 73
  • [42] Sample size considerations for clinical research studies in nuclear cardiology
    Cody Chiuzan
    Erin A. West
    Jimmy Duong
    Ken Y. K. Cheung
    Andrew J. Einstein
    Journal of Nuclear Cardiology, 2015, 22 : 1300 - 1313
  • [43] Sample size considerations for studies of intervention efficacy in the occupational setting
    Lazovichi, Deann
    Murray, David M.
    Brosseau, Lisa M.
    Parker, David L.
    Milton, F. Thomas
    Dugan, Siobhan K.
    2002, Oxford University Press (46):
  • [44] Sample size considerations for historical control studies with survival outcomes
    Zhu, Hong
    Zhang, Song
    Ahn, Chul
    JOURNAL OF BIOPHARMACEUTICAL STATISTICS, 2016, 26 (04) : 657 - 671
  • [45] SAMPLE-SIZE CONSIDERATIONS IN DESIGNING STUDIES WITH INTRAORAL MODELS
    STOOKEY, GK
    KATZ, BP
    BEISWANGER, BB
    DUNIPACE, AJ
    JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 1992, 71 : 819 - 821
  • [46] Sample size considerations for clinical research studies in nuclear cardiology
    Chiuzan, Cody
    West, Erin A.
    Duong, Jimmy
    Cheung, Ken Y. K.
    Einstein, Andrew J.
    JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR CARDIOLOGY, 2015, 22 (06) : 1300 - 1313
  • [47] Sample size considerations for studies of intervention efficacy in the occupational setting
    Lazovich, D
    Murray, DM
    Brosseau, LM
    Parker, DL
    Milton, FT
    Dugan, SK
    ANNALS OF OCCUPATIONAL HYGIENE, 2002, 46 (02): : 219 - 227
  • [48] Sample size considerations in observational health care quality studies
    Normand, SLT
    Zou, KH
    STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2002, 21 (03) : 331 - 345
  • [49] Sample size calculation for the one-sample log-rank test
    Schmidt, Rene
    Kwiecien, Robert
    Faldum, Andreas
    Berthold, Frank
    Hero, Barbara
    Ligges, Sandra
    STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2015, 34 (06) : 1031 - 1040
  • [50] Sample size calculation for the one-sample log-rank test
    Wu, Jianrong
    PHARMACEUTICAL STATISTICS, 2015, 14 (01) : 26 - 33