Outcomes from assisted reproductive technology

被引:55
|
作者
Van Voorhis, B [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Iowa, Roy J & Lucille A Carver Coll Med, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Iowa City, IA 52242 USA
来源
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY | 2006年 / 107卷 / 01期
关键词
D O I
10.1097/01.AOG.0000194207.06554.5b
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
The use of assisted reproductive technology (ART) for treating the infertile couple is increasing in the United States. The purpose of this paper is to review the short-term outcomes after ART. Pregnancy rates after ART have shown nearly continuous improvement in the years since its inception. A number of factors affect the pregnancy rate, with the most important being a woman's age. Certain clinical diagnoses are associated with a poorer outcome from ART, including the presence of hydrosalpinges, uterine leiomyomata that distort the endometrial cavity, and decreased ovarian reserve. Multiple gestations are the major complication after ART. New laboratory techniques, including extended embryo culture, may allow the transfer of fewer embryos to maintain pregnancy rates while reducing the risk of multiple gestations. Although much of the morbidity in children born after ART is the result of multiples, recent analysis suggests that even singletons are at higher risk for perinatal morbidity, including preterm delivery and small for gestational age infants. In vitro fertilization may be associated with a slight increased risk for birth defects. The major short-term complication of ART in women is the development of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome. This syndrome is difficult to predict; but new treatments are being developed that may limit its frequency. Because of its high pregnancy rate, couples are moving to ART more quickly in the management of their infertility. All outcomes of ART, including pregnancy rates and adverse complications, need to be compared with standard non-ART therapy when deciding the appropriate course of treatment for a given couple.
引用
下载
收藏
页码:183 / 200
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] ASSISTED REPRODUCTIVE TECHNOLOGY TREATMENT OUTCOMES IN WOMEN WITH LIVER DISEASE
    Lee, Jessica D.
    Hanley, William J.
    Lee, Joseph A.
    Mukherjee, Tanmoy
    Kushner, Tatyana
    GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2022, 162 (07) : S1147 - S1148
  • [32] Assisted Reproductive Technology Treatment Outcomes in Women With Liver Disease
    Lee, Jessica D.
    Gounko, Dmitry
    Lee, Joseph A.
    Mukherjee, Tanmoy
    Kushner, Tatyana
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2023, 118 (12): : 2184 - 2190
  • [33] TRANSPARENCY OF PUBLIC REPORTING OF CLINICAL OUTCOMES IN ASSISTED REPRODUCTIVE TECHNOLOGY
    Kushnir, V. A.
    Vidali, A.
    Barad, D. H.
    Gleicher, N.
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2013, 100 (03) : S146 - S146
  • [34] Racial and ethnic disparities in assisted reproductive technology access and outcomes
    Quinn, Molly
    Fujimoto, Victor
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2016, 105 (05) : 1119 - 1123
  • [35] Assisted reproductive technology outcomes and management considerations for people with epilepsy
    Lemley, Regan J.
    Voinescu, Paula Emanuela
    CURRENT OPINION IN ENDOCRINOLOGY DIABETES AND OBESITY, 2023, 30 (06) : 280 - 284
  • [36] Impacts of assisted reproductive technology on perinatal outcomes and offspring health
    Jin Hong
    Sun Yi-Juan
    Shu Yi-Min
    生殖与发育医学(英文), 2023, 07 (01)
  • [37] The Relationship of Assisted Reproductive Technology on Perinatal Outcomes in Triplet Gestations
    Shah, Jaimin S.
    Roman, Tania
    Viteri, Oscar A.
    Haidar, Ziad A.
    Ontiveros, Alejandra
    Sibai, Baha M.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PERINATOLOGY, 2018, 35 (14) : 1388 - 1393
  • [38] Public reporting of assisted reproductive technology cycle outcomes is not simple
    Doody, Kevin J.
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2016, 105 (04) : 893 - 894
  • [39] Profiling assisted reproductive technology: outcomes and quality of infertility management
    Steinberg, EP
    Holtz, PM
    Sullivan, EM
    Villar, CP
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 1998, 69 (04) : 617 - 623
  • [40] Re: Varicocelectomy before Assisted Reproductive Technology: Are Outcomes Improved?
    Niederberger, Craig
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2018, 199 (06): : 1381 - 1382