SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS OF DIFFERENT EVAPOTRANSPIRATION METHODS USING A NEW SENSITIVITY COEFFICIENT

被引:0
|
作者
Ambas, V. Th. [1 ]
Baltas, E. [2 ]
机构
[1] Reg Western Macedonia, Dept Soil Water Resources Conservat, Florina 53100, Greece
[2] Aristotle Univ Thessaloniki, Dept Hydraul Soil Sci & Agr Engn, GR-54006 Thessaloniki, Greece
来源
GLOBAL NEST JOURNAL | 2012年 / 14卷 / 03期
关键词
sensitivity coefficient; reference evapotranspiration; evapotranspiration method; meteorological parameters; PENMAN-MONTEITH;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The estimation of evapotranspiration is essential in water resources management. Among a group of methods, the Penman-Monteith has been commonly applied to calculate reference evapotranspiration as this method has been also recommended by the Food and Agriculture Organization of the U.N. (FAO). Other methods widely used are: the FAO 24 Penman, the modified Blaney and Criddle, the FAO 24 Makkink, and the Hargreaves. Sensitivity analysis is required to gain a better understanding of the meteorological systems; particularly to indicate the physical meaning of each meteorological parameter used in the estimation of the reference evapotranspiration. Several dimensionless sensitivity coefficients have been proposed, based on the partial derivative of the dependent variable (reference evapotranspiration) to the independent variables (meteorological variables). In this paper, a new sensitivity coefficient is proposed to drive sensitivity analysis of the evapotranspiration methods. The new sensitivity coefficient uses the partial derivative and the standard deviation of each independent variable. The meteorological variables, whose influence has been examined, are all the necessary meteorological parameters for the calculation of reference evapotranspiration, such as temperature, solar radiation, wind speed and relative humidity for each method. Data from the automatic meteorological station of Aminteo in the Prefecture of Florina, Western Macedonia, were used. The sensitivity coefficients were calculated for each month, year and irrigation period. The comparison of the sensitivity coefficients is performed for the month of water peak demand (July), the irrigation period and the year for each evapotranspiration method. Results show that the influence of the variables to evapotranspiration is not the same for each period, and also the order that the variables influence evapotranspiration is changing. A comparison between the five evapotranspiration methods shows that solar radiation and temperature are the main parameters that affect evapotranspiration, while relative humidity and wind speed are not so important for the calculation of evapotranspiration.
引用
收藏
页码:335 / 343
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] EFFICIENT METHODS FOR SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS
    CLEMSON, B
    SYSTEM DYNAMICS REVIEW, 1995, 11 (01) : 31 - 49
  • [32] Sensitivity of the Evapotranspiration Deficit Index to Its Parameters and Different Temporal Scales
    Wambura, Frank Joseph
    HYDROLOGY, 2021, 8 (01) : 1 - 14
  • [33] SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS OF THE DOPPLER COEFFICIENT IN HETEROGENEOUS LMFBRS
    WHITE, JR
    KONOVALCHICK, J
    MARABLE, JH
    LUCIUS, JL
    TRANSACTIONS OF THE AMERICAN NUCLEAR SOCIETY, 1983, 45 : 769 - 770
  • [34] New Methods of Template Attack Based on Fault Sensitivity Analysis
    Wang Q.
    Wang A.
    Qu G.
    Zhang G.
    IEEE Transactions on Multi-Scale Computing Systems, 2017, 3 (02): : 113 - 123
  • [35] COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT-SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS METHODS IN THE CONTEXT OF DIMENSIONAL MANAGEMENT
    Heling, Bjoern
    Oberleiter, Thomas
    Schleich, Benjamin
    Willner, Kai
    Wartzack, Sandro
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE ASME INTERNATIONAL MECHANICAL ENGINEERING CONGRESS AND EXPOSITION, 2017, VOL 2, 2018,
  • [36] Global sensitivity analysis in wastewater applications: A comprehensive comparison of different methods
    Cosenza, Alida
    Mannina, Giorgio
    Vanrolleghem, Peter A.
    Neumann, Marc B.
    ENVIRONMENTAL MODELLING & SOFTWARE, 2013, 49 : 40 - 52
  • [38] Future trend and sensitivity analysis of evapotranspiration in the Senegal River Basin
    Ndiaye, Papa Malick
    Bodian, Ansoumana
    Diop, Lamine
    Dezetter, Alain
    Guilpart, Etienne
    Deme, Abdoulaye
    Ogilvie, Andrew
    JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY-REGIONAL STUDIES, 2021, 35
  • [39] COMPARISON OF SENSITIVITY COEFFICIENT CALCULATION METHODS IN AUTOMATIC HISTORY MATCHING
    DOGRU, AH
    SEINFELD, JH
    SOCIETY OF PETROLEUM ENGINEERS JOURNAL, 1981, 21 (05): : 551 - 557
  • [40] SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS FOR NONLINEAR-PROGRAMMING USING PENALTY METHODS
    FIACCO, AV
    MATHEMATICAL PROGRAMMING, 1976, 10 (03) : 287 - 311