SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS OF DIFFERENT EVAPOTRANSPIRATION METHODS USING A NEW SENSITIVITY COEFFICIENT

被引:0
|
作者
Ambas, V. Th. [1 ]
Baltas, E. [2 ]
机构
[1] Reg Western Macedonia, Dept Soil Water Resources Conservat, Florina 53100, Greece
[2] Aristotle Univ Thessaloniki, Dept Hydraul Soil Sci & Agr Engn, GR-54006 Thessaloniki, Greece
来源
GLOBAL NEST JOURNAL | 2012年 / 14卷 / 03期
关键词
sensitivity coefficient; reference evapotranspiration; evapotranspiration method; meteorological parameters; PENMAN-MONTEITH;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The estimation of evapotranspiration is essential in water resources management. Among a group of methods, the Penman-Monteith has been commonly applied to calculate reference evapotranspiration as this method has been also recommended by the Food and Agriculture Organization of the U.N. (FAO). Other methods widely used are: the FAO 24 Penman, the modified Blaney and Criddle, the FAO 24 Makkink, and the Hargreaves. Sensitivity analysis is required to gain a better understanding of the meteorological systems; particularly to indicate the physical meaning of each meteorological parameter used in the estimation of the reference evapotranspiration. Several dimensionless sensitivity coefficients have been proposed, based on the partial derivative of the dependent variable (reference evapotranspiration) to the independent variables (meteorological variables). In this paper, a new sensitivity coefficient is proposed to drive sensitivity analysis of the evapotranspiration methods. The new sensitivity coefficient uses the partial derivative and the standard deviation of each independent variable. The meteorological variables, whose influence has been examined, are all the necessary meteorological parameters for the calculation of reference evapotranspiration, such as temperature, solar radiation, wind speed and relative humidity for each method. Data from the automatic meteorological station of Aminteo in the Prefecture of Florina, Western Macedonia, were used. The sensitivity coefficients were calculated for each month, year and irrigation period. The comparison of the sensitivity coefficients is performed for the month of water peak demand (July), the irrigation period and the year for each evapotranspiration method. Results show that the influence of the variables to evapotranspiration is not the same for each period, and also the order that the variables influence evapotranspiration is changing. A comparison between the five evapotranspiration methods shows that solar radiation and temperature are the main parameters that affect evapotranspiration, while relative humidity and wind speed are not so important for the calculation of evapotranspiration.
引用
收藏
页码:335 / 343
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Sensitivity analysis of methods for estimating reference evapotranspiration and sugarcane evapotranspiration
    Silva, Bruce K. N.
    da Silva, Vicente de P. R.
    de Azevedo, Pedro V.
    Farias, Carlos H. de A.
    REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE ENGENHARIA AGRICOLA E AMBIENTAL, 2011, 15 (10): : 1046 - 1053
  • [2] The relative sensitivity of different alignment methods and character codings in sensitivity analysis
    Simmons, Mark P.
    Mueller, Kai F.
    Webb, Colleen T.
    CLADISTICS, 2008, 24 (06) : 1039 - 1050
  • [3] Sensitivity of evapotranspiration to climatic change in different climates
    Tabari, Hossein
    Talaee, P. Hosseinzadeh
    GLOBAL AND PLANETARY CHANGE, 2014, 115 : 16 - 23
  • [4] SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS OF COMBINATION EVAPOTRANSPIRATION EQUATION
    SAXTON, KE
    TRANSACTIONS-AMERICAN GEOPHYSICAL UNION, 1974, 55 (05): : 548 - 548
  • [5] Sensitivity of methods for estimating potential evapotranspiration to climate change
    Sutapa, I. Wayan
    Saparuddin
    Wicana, Satya
    3RD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF WATER RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION, 2020, 437
  • [6] Sensitivity analysis of an environmental model an application of different analysis methods
    Campolongo, F
    Saltelli, A
    RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 1997, 57 (01) : 49 - 69
  • [7] Sensitivity analysis of reference evapotranspiration to sensor accuracy
    DeJonge, Kendall C.
    Ahmadi, Mehdi
    Ascough, James C., II
    Kinzli, Kristoph-Dietrich
    COMPUTERS AND ELECTRONICS IN AGRICULTURE, 2015, 110 : 176 - 186
  • [8] A sensitivity and error analysis for the penman evapotranspiration model
    Chang-Soo Rim
    KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, 2004, 8 (2) : 249 - 254
  • [9] SENSITIVITY OF SOME POTENTIAL EVAPOTRANSPIRATION ESTIMATION METHODS TO CLIMATE CHANGE
    MCKENNEY, MS
    ROSENBERG, NJ
    AGRICULTURAL AND FOREST METEOROLOGY, 1993, 64 (1-2) : 81 - 110
  • [10] Parameter sensitivity analysis for different complexity land surface models using multicriteria methods
    Bastidas, L. A.
    Hogue, T. S.
    Sorooshian, S.
    Gupta, H. V.
    Shuttleworth, W. J.
    JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 2006, 111 (D20)