ATRAZINE REDUCES THE CRITICAL PERIOD OF WEED INTERFERENCE ON NARROW ROW CORN

被引:0
|
作者
Padilha, M. [1 ,2 ]
Barroso, A. A. M. [3 ]
Carvalho, L. B. [1 ,2 ,4 ]
Costa, F. R. [1 ,2 ]
Bianco, S. [3 ]
机构
[1] Empresa Pesquisa Agropecuaria & Extensao Rural Sa, Rio Fortuna, SC, Brazil
[2] Univ Estado Santa Catarina, Lages, SC, Brazil
[3] Univ Estadual Paulista, Jaboticabal, SP, Brazil
[4] Univ Estadual Paulista, Dracena, SP, Brazil
关键词
herbicide; period of coexistence; Zea mays; MANAGEMENT; CULTIVARS; CROPS;
D O I
10.1590/S0100-83582016340400012
中图分类号
Q94 [植物学];
学科分类号
071001 ;
摘要
The objective was to determine whether a change occurs in the critical period of weed interference prevention in narrow row corn with the use of atrazine and whether there is influence of the herbicide on crop yield components. The treatments consisted of periods without or with an initial weed control (0, 21, 35, 49, 63, 77, and 91 days after emergence), with or without application of atrazine in spikely post-emergence. The experiment was carried out in a 2 x 7 randomized blocks design (with and without weed control and seven periods with three replications). The use or not of atrazine was arranged in a split plot design. The most important weed species were Senecio brasiliensis, Urochloa plantaginea, Conyza bonariensis, Sida rhombifolia, and Solanum spp. Corn yield reduced by 15% and 18% with and without application of atrazine, respectively. The number of grains per spike and corn yield were negatively influenced by coexistence with weeds, while the number of rows per spike, the diameter and length of spike were not affected. Corn yield components were not affected by the use of atrazine. The critical period of weed interference prevention was 35 days without atrazine and 23 days with application of atrazine. There is a reduction of the critical period of weed interference prevention on narrow row corn by using atrazine, with no influence of the herbicide on crop yield.
引用
收藏
页码:721 / 727
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] CRITICAL PERIOD OF WEED INTERFERENCE IN TRANSPLANTED TOMATOES (LYCOPERSICON-ESCULENTUM) - GROWTH ANALYSIS
    WEAVER, SE
    TAN, CS
    WEED SCIENCE, 1983, 31 (04) : 476 - 481
  • [42] Interaction between tolpyralate and atrazine for the control of annual weed species in corn
    Fluttert, John C.
    Soltani, Nader
    Galla, Mariano
    Hooker, David C.
    Robinson, Darren E.
    Sikkema, Peter H.
    WEED SCIENCE, 2022, 70 (04) : 408 - 422
  • [43] Critical period of weed control in no-till soybean (Glycine max) and corn (Zea mays)
    Halford, C
    Hamill, AS
    Zhang, J
    Doucet, C
    WEED TECHNOLOGY, 2001, 15 (04) : 737 - 744
  • [44] Determination of the critical period for weed control of sweet corn under tropical organic farming system
    Simarmata, Marulak
    Nurjanah, Uswatun
    Setyowati, Nanik
    ASIAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURE AND BIOLOGY, 2018, 6 (04): : 447 - 454
  • [45] Weed seed return as influenced by the critical weed-free period and row spacing of no-till glyphosate-resistant soybean
    Chandler, K
    Shrestha, A
    Swanton, CJ
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF PLANT SCIENCE, 2001, 81 (04) : 877 - 880
  • [46] In-row preplant manure composting reduces weed populations
    Abu-Irmaileh, B
    Abu-Rayyan, A
    HORTSCIENCE, 2004, 39 (06) : 1456 - 1460
  • [47] Microclimatic and rooting characteristics of narrow-row versus conventional-row corn
    Sharratt, BS
    McWilliams, DA
    AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 2005, 97 (04) : 1129 - 1135
  • [48] Effect of Peanut Crop Row Spacing on Weed Interference in the Culture
    Dias, T. C. S.
    Alves, P. L. C. A.
    Pavani, M. C. M. D.
    Nepomuceno, M.
    PLANTA DANINHA, 2009, 27 (02) : 221 - 228
  • [49] Response of corn genotypes to weed interference and nitrogen in Nigeria
    Chikoye, David
    Lum, Ayeoffe F.
    Abaidoo, Robert
    Menkir, Abebe
    Kamara, Alpha
    Ekeleme, Friday
    Sanginga, Nteranya
    WEED SCIENCE, 2008, 56 (03) : 424 - 433
  • [50] Critical period for weed competition with wheat
    Agostinetto, D.
    Rigoli, R. P.
    Schaedler, C. E.
    Tironi, S. P.
    Santos, L. S.
    PLANTA DANINHA, 2008, 26 (02) : 271 - 278