Postoperative tamoxifen for ductal carcinoma in situ

被引:52
|
作者
Staley, Helen [1 ]
McCallum, Iain [1 ]
Bruce, Julie [2 ]
机构
[1] Northumbria Healthcare NHS Fdn Trust, N Tyneside Gen Hosp, N Shields NE29 8NH, Tyne & Wear, England
[2] Univ Warwick, Warwick Clin Trials Unit, Coventry CV4 7AL, W Midlands, England
关键词
BREAST-CANCER PREVENTION; SURGICAL ADJUVANT BREAST; LOW-DOSE TAMOXIFEN; LOCAL RECURRENCE; DOUBLE-BLIND; FOLLOW-UP; HIGH-RISK; RADIOTHERAPY; TRIAL; WOMEN;
D O I
10.1002/14651858.CD007847.pub2
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) is a non-invasive carcinoma of the breast. The incidence of DCIS has increased substantially over the last twenty years, largely as a result of the introduction of population-based mammographic screening. The treatment of DCIS tumours involves surgery with or without radiotherapy to prevent recurrent DCIS and invasive carcinoma. However, there is clinical uncertainty as to whether postoperative hormonal treatment (tamoxifen) after surgery confers benefit in overall survival and incidence of recurrent carcinoma. Objectives To assess the effects of postoperative tamoxifen in women having local surgical resection of DCIS. Search methods We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL, The Cochrane Library), the Cochrane Breast Cancer Group's Specialised Register, and the World Health Organization's International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (WHO ICTRP) on 16 August 2011. Selection criteria Published and unpublished randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-randomised controlled trials comparing tamoxifen after surgery for DCIS (regardless of oestrogen receptor status), with or without adjuvant radiotherapy. Data collection and analysis Two authors independently assessed trial quality and extracted data. Statistical analyses were performed using the fixed-effect model and the results were expressed as relative risks (RRs) or hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Main results We included two RCTs involving 3375 women. Tamoxifen after surgery for DCIS reduced recurrence of both ipsilateral (same side) DCIS (HR 0.75; 95% CI 0.61 to 0.92) and contralateral (opposite side) DCIS (RR 0.50; 95% CI 0.28 to 0.87). There was a trend towards decreased ipsilateral invasive cancer (HR 0.79; 95% CI 0.62 to 1.01) and reduced contralateral invasive cancer (RR 0.57; 95% CI 0.39 to 0.83). The number needed to treat in order for tamoxifen to have a protective effect against all breast events is 15. There was no evidence of a difference detected in all cause mortality (RR 1.11; 95% CI 0.89 to 1.39). Only one study, involving 1799 participants followed-up for 163 months (median) reported on adverse events (i.e. toxicity, mood changes, deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, endometrial cancer) with no significant difference between tamoxifen and placebo groups, but there was a non-significant trend towards more endometrial cancer in the tamoxifen group. Authors' conclusions While tamoxifen after local excision for DCIS (with or without adjuvant radiotherapy) reduced the risk of recurrent DCIS (in the ipsi- and contralateral breast), it did not reduce the risk of overall mortality.
引用
收藏
页数:32
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Ductal Carcinoma in Situ
    Bleicher, Richard J.
    SURGICAL CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2013, 93 (02) : 393 - +
  • [32] Effects of reproductive risk factors for ductal carcinoma in situ, invasive ductal carcinoma, and invasive ductal carcinoma with ductal carcinoma in situ on clinical outcomes
    Lee, J.
    Lee, J.
    Oh, M.
    CANCER RESEARCH, 2016, 76
  • [33] Treatment outcome of ductal carcinoma in situ patients treated with postoperative radiation therapy
    Lim, Yu Jin
    Kim, Kyubo
    Chie, Eui Kyu
    Han, Wonshik
    Noh, Dong Young
    Ha, Sung W.
    RADIATION ONCOLOGY JOURNAL, 2014, 32 (01): : 1 - 6
  • [34] Impact of estrogen receptor expression and other clinicopathologic features on tamoxifen use in ductal carcinoma in situ
    Hird, RB
    Chang, A
    Cimmino, V
    Diehl, K
    Sabel, M
    Kleer, C
    Helvie, M
    Schott, A
    Young, J
    Hayes, D
    Newman, L
    CANCER, 2006, 106 (10) : 2113 - 2118
  • [35] Breast-conserving treatment for ductal carcinoma in situ: Impact of boost and tamoxifen on local recurrences
    Cutuli, B.
    Wiezzane, N.
    Palumbo, I.
    Barbieri, P.
    Guenzi, M.
    Huscher, A.
    Borghesi, S.
    Delva, C.
    Iannone, T.
    Vianello, E.
    Rosetto, M. -E.
    Aristei, C.
    CANCER RADIOTHERAPIE, 2016, 20 (04): : 292 - 298
  • [36] Initiation of and Adherence to Tamoxifen and Aromatase Inhibitor Therapy Among Elderly Women With Ductal Carcinoma In Situ
    Zhao, Hui
    Hei, Nainan
    Wu, Yiling
    Chan, Winston
    Lei, Xiudong
    Cameron, Carrie
    Chang, Shine
    Chavez-MacGregor, Mariana
    Giordano, Sharon H.
    CANCER, 2017, 123 (06) : 940 - 947
  • [37] Higher tamoxifen use as chemoprophylaxis in patients with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) in the last decade.
    Roesch, Erin E.
    Wei, Lai
    Ramaswamy, Bhuvaneswari
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2012, 30 (27)
  • [38] Tamoxifen Acceptance and Adherence among Patients with Ductal Carcinoma In Situ (DCIS) Treated in a Multidisciplinary Setting
    Karavites, Lindsey C.
    Kane, Anna K.
    Zaveri, Shruti
    Xu, Yanfei
    Helenowski, Irene
    Hansen, Nora
    Bethke, Kevin P.
    Rasmussen-Torvik, Laura J.
    Khan, Seema A.
    CANCER PREVENTION RESEARCH, 2017, 10 (07) : 389 - 397
  • [39] Expression of HER-2/neu and Paxillin in Ductal Carcinoma in situ, Invasive Ductal Carcinoma with Ductal Carcinoma in situ and Mucinous Carcinoma
    Han, Sun-Wook
    Choi, Yoon-Young
    Woo, Hee-Doo
    Sohn, Doo-Min
    Bae, Sang-Ho
    Gang, Gil-Ho
    Kim, Sung-Yong
    Back, Moo-Jun
    Lim, Cheol-Wan
    Lee, Moon-Soo
    Kim, Chang-Ho
    Lee, Min-Hyuk
    Rho, Jin-Hyuk
    Cho, Hyun-Deuk
    Oh, Mee Hye
    Kim, Eui-Han
    Cho, Moo-Sik
    JOURNAL OF BREAST CANCER, 2008, 11 (03) : 109 - 115
  • [40] Ductal Carcinoma In Situ of the Breast
    Vaidya, Yash
    Vaidya, Pradeep
    Vaidya, Tanvi
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2015, 77 (02) : 141 - 146