A Method for Reducing the Performance Gap Between Non-Coherent and Coherent Sub-Arrays

被引:4
|
作者
Tirer, Tom [1 ,2 ]
Bialer, Oded [1 ]
机构
[1] Gen Motors, Adv Tech Ctr, IL-46733 Herzliyya, Israel
[2] Tel Aviv Univ, Sch Elect Engn, IL-69978 Tel Aviv, Israel
关键词
Maximum likelihood estimation; Array signal processing; Apertures; Local oscillators; Phased arrays; Angle of arrival; array processing; Cramer-Rao lower bound; maximum likelihood estimation; single snapshot; OF-ARRIVAL ESTIMATION; DIRECT POSITION DETERMINATION; MAXIMUM-LIKELIHOOD; PARAMETER-ESTIMATION; SOURCE LOCALIZATION; SIGNAL; MUSIC; ALGORITHM;
D O I
10.1109/TSP.2020.2997196
中图分类号
TM [电工技术]; TN [电子技术、通信技术];
学科分类号
0808 ; 0809 ;
摘要
We consider the problem of estimating the angles of arrival (AOAs) of multiple sources from a single snapshot obtained by a set of non-coherent sub-arrays, i.e., while the antenna elements in each sub-array are coherent, each sub-array observes a different unknown phase offset. Previous relevant works are based on eigendecomposition of the sample covariance, which requires a large number of snapshots, or on combining the sub-arrays using non-coherent processing. In this paper, we propose a technique to estimate the sub-arrays phase offsets for a given AOAs hypothesis, which facilitates approximate maximum likelihood estimation (MLE) of the AOAs from a single snapshot. We derive the Cramer-Rao lower bound (CRLB) for the problem at hand, and analytically show that for a single source it may suffice to use a simple non-coherent AOA estimation. However, as we demonstrate by computer simulations, for multiple sources the proposed approach clearly outperforms the non-coherent estimator, and even attains the CRLB in various scenarios. Furthermore, the performance of the proposed method is often close to the performance of MLE in the coherent case, and the gap between the estimators is unavoidable, as implied by the gap between the CRLB for the coherent and non-coherent cases.
引用
收藏
页码:3358 / 3370
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Performance of non-coherent digital equalisers in DECT systems
    Benvenuto, N
    Salloum, A
    Tomba, L
    ELECTRONICS LETTERS, 1996, 32 (02) : 97 - 98
  • [22] Performance Comparison of Coherent and Non-Coherent Detection Schemes in LR-UWB System
    Kwon, Soonkoo
    Ji, Sinae
    Kim, Jaeseok
    JOURNAL OF COMMUNICATIONS AND NETWORKS, 2012, 14 (05) : 518 - 523
  • [23] Performance of the non-coherent DLL in multiple access interference
    Caffery, J
    Stuber, GL
    1998 IEEE 5TH INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON SPREAD SPECTRUM TECHNIQUES AND APPLICATIONS - PROCEEDINGS, VOLS 1-3, 1998, : 823 - 827
  • [24] Non-Coherent UWB Communications
    Wolf, Mike
    Song, Nuan
    Haardt, Martin
    FREQUENZ, 2009, 63 (9-10) : 187 - 191
  • [25] Adaptive Non-Coherent Integration
    Scharrenbroich, Max
    Zatman, Michael
    Denney, James
    2015 IEEE INTERNATIONAL RADAR CONFERENCE (RADARCON), 2015, : 1004 - 1009
  • [26] Performance of non-coherent digital equalisers in DECT systems
    Univ of Padova, Padova, Italy
    Electron Lett, 2 (97-98):
  • [27] ODQPSK non-coherent reception
    Frantzeskakis, E
    Posonidis, A
    2000 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ACOUSTICS, SPEECH, AND SIGNAL PROCESSING, PROCEEDINGS, VOLS I-VI, 2000, : 3638 - 3641
  • [28] Comparative Study of Non-Coherent Pulse Compression and Non-Coherent Pulse Integration Techniques for Radars
    Kayani, Jahangir K.
    Hashmi, Ali J.
    2013 14TH INTERNATIONAL RADAR SYMPOSIUM (IRS), VOLS 1 AND 2, 2013, : 696 - 701
  • [29] Direction Finding Using Non-coherent Measurements in Large Antenna Arrays
    Chowdhury, Mainak
    Rao, Milind
    Goldsmith, Andrea
    2017 FIFTY-FIRST ASILOMAR CONFERENCE ON SIGNALS, SYSTEMS, AND COMPUTERS, 2017, : 1231 - 1236
  • [30] Target localization by two fixed non-coherent passive linear Arrays
    Ma, Ning
    Chia, Chin Swee
    OCEANS 2008 - MTS/IEEE KOBE TECHNO-OCEAN, VOLS 1-3, 2008, : 134 - 138